Context and process: An ecological view of the interdependence of practice and research

• Published in: American journal of community psychology 1986-12, Vol.14 (6), p.581-589
• Main Author: Kelly, James G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Indexing in process; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Social psychology; Theories
• ISSN: 0091-0562; 1573-2770
• DOI: 10.1007/BF00931335

ConclusionThe future for the field of community psychology is promising as we visualize that our key resources are citizens, colleagues in pyschology, and those persons in the social sciences who share a commitment to collaborative research.An antidote for coping with the regal quality of our scientific heritage and the discomfort about not being able to reduce the barriers between research and practice is to develop an investigative style that makes inquiry not just a right or privilege but makes community research a genuinely collaborative process. Without such collaboration our ideas run the risk of being sterile and our impact puny and shallow. With such collaboration researchers and citizens have the opportunity to generate a style of work that will contribute to our own personal development and to the evolution of our social setings.As a distinct bonus we can construct a philosophy for our work that is truly democratic — where research and practice are integrated by a process of conjoint ownership. In this sense, the interdependence of research and practice can be realized: for the science, for the profession, and for the citizens of community psychology.