Witnesses at the Confirmations? The Appearance of Organized Interests at Senate Hearings of Federal Judicial Appointments, 1945-1992

Previous research suggests that groups increasingly dominate the selection of federal court judges. We evaluate this conventional wisdom with longitudinal data tracing the appearance of organized interests at nearly 2,000 lower court confirmation hearings between 1945-1992. We find mixed support for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political research quarterly 1998-09, Vol.51 (3), p.617-631
Main Authors: Flemming, Roy B., MacLeod, Michael C., Talbert, Jeffery
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Appointment (1945-92)
Confirmation hearings
CONFIRMATION PROCESS FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
Confirmations
Congressional committees
Congressional hearings
Courts
Elections
Federal courts
Government policy
History
Institutions
Interest Groups
Judges
Judges & magistrates
Judicial system
Judiciary
Law
Legal aspects
Political appointments
Political interest groups
Public hearings
Senate
SENATE (ALL NATIONS)
Senators
U.S.A
United States
United States Senate
Upper chamber
Upper houses
Voters
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previous research suggests that groups increasingly dominate the selection of federal court judges. We evaluate this conventional wisdom with longitudinal data tracing the appearance of organized interests at nearly 2,000 lower court confirmation hearings between 1945-1992. We find mixed support for the conventional wisdom. Organized interests do not appear more often before the Senate Judiciary Committee than in the past but there has been a considerable shift in the kinds of groups that testify. We also find that the incidence of controversial nominations has declined while the intensity of conflicts when they occur has increased. These changes, we suggest, reflect the evolution of differential group access to the selection process as a function of shifting opportunities and incentives generated by broader political forces altering the electoral, policy, and institutional interests of the key players in the process.
ISSN:1065-9129
1938-274X
DOI:10.1177/106591299805100303