Direct Payments and Social Work Practice: The Significance of ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy’ in Determining Eligibility

Sponsored both by governments intent upon fiscal restraint and user movements keen to extend choice and control, ‘cash-for-care’ schemes are replacing direct services across mature welfare states. Recent legislation on direct payments, which has enacted the UK version of cash-for-care, has attracted...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The British journal of social work 2007-04, Vol.37 (3), p.405-422
Main Author: Ellis, Kathryn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bureaucracy
Compensation
direct payments
Disabilities
Fiscal Policy
Government bureaucracy
Health care policy
Independent living
Information management
Money
Older adults
Organizational culture
Organizational Structure
Payments
professional values
Rationing
Social policy
Social work
Social workers
street-level bureaucracy
Time management
United Kingdom
Values
Welfare Recipients
Welfare Services
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sponsored both by governments intent upon fiscal restraint and user movements keen to extend choice and control, ‘cash-for-care’ schemes are replacing direct services across mature welfare states. Recent legislation on direct payments, which has enacted the UK version of cash-for-care, has attracted considerable research interest in the UK. Previous studies point to a number of tensions for social workers in the implementation process which give rise, in turn, to considerable uncertainty, even hostility, on the part of front line staff. This article, which discusses the findings of a study of assessment and care management practice in one English council, seeks to make sense of social workers’ approach to the allocation of direct payments by reference to Lipsky’s (1980) theory of ‘street-level bureaucracy’. The author concludes that despite ten years of managerialism, in the course of which professional practice has been routinized and regulated, Lipsky’s work is still useful in analysing front line behaviour around direct payments.
ISSN:0045-3102
1468-263X
DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcm013