Small is not too Small: Reflections Concerning the Validity of Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs)

This article discusses issues of validity in focus group methodology when very few people actually participate in the research. The defense of small size emerges from experiences in dissertation research with women who have abused illegal substances and self-identify as addicts. Validity is addresse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice 2009-06, Vol.8 (2), p.179-192
Main Author: Toner, Jean
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Drug Addiction
Females
Feminist Theory
Group Research
Marginality
Methodological Problems
Research Design
Small Groups
Social Work Research
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-1df3a64ebae9ce5e8e1a73e351ee69ae20724e441430755dfd27d546650af14a3
container_end_page 192
container_issue 2
container_start_page 179
container_title Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice
container_volume 8
creator Toner, Jean
description This article discusses issues of validity in focus group methodology when very few people actually participate in the research. The defense of small size emerges from experiences in dissertation research with women who have abused illegal substances and self-identify as addicts. Validity is addressed through application of standard measures of validity to the Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs). In addition, the VSFGs are analyzed according to characteristics of group development, demonstrating that even with small size, typical group development stages occur. Attention is paid to feminist research principles, demonstrating that those principles are expressed regardless of small group size. Implications for social work research and practice in partnership with marginalized people are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1473325009103374
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61390926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1473325009103374</sage_id><sourcerecordid>61390926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-1df3a64ebae9ce5e8e1a73e351ee69ae20724e441430755dfd27d546650af14a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1LxEAQxRdR8DxtxTKV3erMfialHHoKBxZqvazJRHIk2XM3Kfzv3fOsBKsZ5vfewHuMXSHcIFp7i8pKKTRAhSClVUdsgVYhl5ke5z1jvuen7CylLYBAU6oFu3wZfN8XXSrGMBVTCMXP4ZydtL5PdPE7l-zt4f519cg3z-un1d2G11jCxLFppTeK3j1VNWkqCb2VJDUSmcqTACsUKYVKgtW6aRthG62M0eBbVF4u2fXh7y6Gz5nS5IYu1dT3fqQwJ2dQVlAJk4VwENYxpBSpdbvYDT5-OQS3L8D9LSBb-MGS_Ae5bZjjmKP8r_8G-aJXwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61390926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small is not too Small: Reflections Concerning the Validity of Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs)</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Toner, Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Toner, Jean</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses issues of validity in focus group methodology when very few people actually participate in the research. The defense of small size emerges from experiences in dissertation research with women who have abused illegal substances and self-identify as addicts. Validity is addressed through application of standard measures of validity to the Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs). In addition, the VSFGs are analyzed according to characteristics of group development, demonstrating that even with small size, typical group development stages occur. Attention is paid to feminist research principles, demonstrating that those principles are expressed regardless of small group size. Implications for social work research and practice in partnership with marginalized people are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1473325009103374</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Drug Addiction ; Females ; Feminist Theory ; Group Research ; Marginality ; Methodological Problems ; Research Design ; Small Groups ; Social Work Research</subject><ispartof>Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice, 2009-06, Vol.8 (2), p.179-192</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-1df3a64ebae9ce5e8e1a73e351ee69ae20724e441430755dfd27d546650af14a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toner, Jean</creatorcontrib><title>Small is not too Small: Reflections Concerning the Validity of Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs)</title><title>Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice</title><description>This article discusses issues of validity in focus group methodology when very few people actually participate in the research. The defense of small size emerges from experiences in dissertation research with women who have abused illegal substances and self-identify as addicts. Validity is addressed through application of standard measures of validity to the Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs). In addition, the VSFGs are analyzed according to characteristics of group development, demonstrating that even with small size, typical group development stages occur. Attention is paid to feminist research principles, demonstrating that those principles are expressed regardless of small group size. Implications for social work research and practice in partnership with marginalized people are discussed.</description><subject>Drug Addiction</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminist Theory</subject><subject>Group Research</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Small Groups</subject><subject>Social Work Research</subject><issn>1473-3250</issn><issn>1741-3117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1LxEAQxRdR8DxtxTKV3erMfialHHoKBxZqvazJRHIk2XM3Kfzv3fOsBKsZ5vfewHuMXSHcIFp7i8pKKTRAhSClVUdsgVYhl5ke5z1jvuen7CylLYBAU6oFu3wZfN8XXSrGMBVTCMXP4ZydtL5PdPE7l-zt4f519cg3z-un1d2G11jCxLFppTeK3j1VNWkqCb2VJDUSmcqTACsUKYVKgtW6aRthG62M0eBbVF4u2fXh7y6Gz5nS5IYu1dT3fqQwJ2dQVlAJk4VwENYxpBSpdbvYDT5-OQS3L8D9LSBb-MGS_Ae5bZjjmKP8r_8G-aJXwg</recordid><startdate>200906</startdate><enddate>200906</enddate><creator>Toner, Jean</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200906</creationdate><title>Small is not too Small</title><author>Toner, Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-1df3a64ebae9ce5e8e1a73e351ee69ae20724e441430755dfd27d546650af14a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Drug Addiction</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminist Theory</topic><topic>Group Research</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Small Groups</topic><topic>Social Work Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toner, Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toner, Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small is not too Small: Reflections Concerning the Validity of Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs)</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice</jtitle><date>2009-06</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>179-192</pages><issn>1473-3250</issn><eissn>1741-3117</eissn><abstract>This article discusses issues of validity in focus group methodology when very few people actually participate in the research. The defense of small size emerges from experiences in dissertation research with women who have abused illegal substances and self-identify as addicts. Validity is addressed through application of standard measures of validity to the Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs). In addition, the VSFGs are analyzed according to characteristics of group development, demonstrating that even with small size, typical group development stages occur. Attention is paid to feminist research principles, demonstrating that those principles are expressed regardless of small group size. Implications for social work research and practice in partnership with marginalized people are discussed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1473325009103374</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-3250
ispartof Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice, 2009-06, Vol.8 (2), p.179-192
issn 1473-3250
1741-3117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61390926
source Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Drug Addiction
Females
Feminist Theory
Group Research
Marginality
Methodological Problems
Research Design
Small Groups
Social Work Research
title Small is not too Small: Reflections Concerning the Validity of Very Small Focus Groups (VSFGs)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A56%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small%20is%20not%20too%20Small:%20Reflections%20Concerning%20the%20Validity%20of%20Very%20Small%20Focus%20Groups%20(VSFGs)&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20social%20work%20:%20QSW%20:%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=Toner,%20Jean&rft.date=2009-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=179-192&rft.issn=1473-3250&rft.eissn=1741-3117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1473325009103374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61390926%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-1df3a64ebae9ce5e8e1a73e351ee69ae20724e441430755dfd27d546650af14a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61390926&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1473325009103374&rfr_iscdi=true