Loading…
Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?
Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Review of social economy 1996-04, Vol.54 (1), p.47-65 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503 |
container_end_page | 65 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 47 |
container_title | Review of social economy |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Kate, Sweezy Jill, Tiefenthaler |
description | Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the effects of state-level variables on individuals' decisions to divorce. In this study, state-level variables including AFDC and food stamp payments, property distribution laws, waiting periods, and two measures of conservatism are merged with a micro data set in order to examine the effects of these variables as well as individual-level variables on the probability of divorce. Event history analysis indicates that the effects of the individual-level variables are consistent with previous work. Among the state-level variables, only the percentage of regular church-goers and the percentage of fundamentalists in the state have a significant impact on divorce. These results reject notions that liberal divorce laws and generous AFDC payments encourage the breakup of families but support the hypothesis that social norms do influence individual behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00346769600000002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61438706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A18372935</galeid><jstor_id>29769826</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A18372935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d1rFDEQAPAgFjyrf4APwoIgPrjtzCaZTUCQo_WjcCD49RqyuWzZI7epyV6l_71ZV3zQapOHQOY3M_lg7AnCCYKCUwAuqCVNsIzmHluhaKFGpOY-W83xugDxgD3MeQeAXElasZPzWH2a7OTrjb_2ofpq02C74HO17nvvpup8uI7J-epjMfn1I3bU25D941_rMfvy9s3ns_f15sO7i7P1pnZSwVQ30EvZdbYTyHXnUIktOQ3UE2iurFCCGrIgJNfoGt06pWWnuOqww62VwI_Z86XuVYrfDj5PZj9k50Owo4-HbAgFVy3QnVC2Coi4LPDFfyECJyGJsCn02R90Fw9pLPc12GpsgWs5q5eLurTBm2Hs45Ssu_SjTzbE0fdD2V6j4m2jf_avb-Flbv1-cLd5XLxLMefke3OVhr1NN-WkZv5y89eXl5ynS84uTzH9TigPTFo182O9WuJz-7S332MKWzPZmxBTn-zohmz4v8v_ANaptK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791703952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Business Management & Economics Modern Archive</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Humanities Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Kate, Sweezy ; Jill, Tiefenthaler</creator><creatorcontrib>Kate, Sweezy ; Jill, Tiefenthaler</creatorcontrib><description>Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the effects of state-level variables on individuals' decisions to divorce. In this study, state-level variables including AFDC and food stamp payments, property distribution laws, waiting periods, and two measures of conservatism are merged with a micro data set in order to examine the effects of these variables as well as individual-level variables on the probability of divorce. Event history analysis indicates that the effects of the individual-level variables are consistent with previous work. Among the state-level variables, only the percentage of regular church-goers and the percentage of fundamentalists in the state have a significant impact on divorce. These results reject notions that liberal divorce laws and generous AFDC payments encourage the breakup of families but support the hypothesis that social norms do influence individual behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00346769600000002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ROSEZZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, etc: Association for Social Economics</publisher><subject>AFDC ; Analysis ; Children ; Conservatism ; Divorce ; Divorce law ; Divorce rates ; Divorced mothers ; Economic aspects ; Evaluation ; event history analysis ; Food stamp program ; Food Stamps ; Human capital ; Law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Marital property ; Marriage ; No fault divorces ; Norms ; Payments ; Pregnancy ; Property law ; Public assistance programs ; Religious Fundamentalism ; Social economics ; Social factors ; State Society Relationship ; USA ; Welfare Recipients ; Welfare Services</subject><ispartof>Review of social economy, 1996-04, Vol.54 (1), p.47-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1996</rights><rights>Association for Social Economics 1996</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 Routledge</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29769826$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29769826$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30999,33774,33849,58237,58470,60131,60920</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kate, Sweezy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jill, Tiefenthaler</creatorcontrib><title>Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?</title><title>Review of social economy</title><description>Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the effects of state-level variables on individuals' decisions to divorce. In this study, state-level variables including AFDC and food stamp payments, property distribution laws, waiting periods, and two measures of conservatism are merged with a micro data set in order to examine the effects of these variables as well as individual-level variables on the probability of divorce. Event history analysis indicates that the effects of the individual-level variables are consistent with previous work. Among the state-level variables, only the percentage of regular church-goers and the percentage of fundamentalists in the state have a significant impact on divorce. These results reject notions that liberal divorce laws and generous AFDC payments encourage the breakup of families but support the hypothesis that social norms do influence individual behavior.</description><subject>AFDC</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Divorce law</subject><subject>Divorce rates</subject><subject>Divorced mothers</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>event history analysis</subject><subject>Food stamp program</subject><subject>Food Stamps</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Marital property</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>No fault divorces</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Property law</subject><subject>Public assistance programs</subject><subject>Religious Fundamentalism</subject><subject>Social economics</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>State Society Relationship</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Welfare Recipients</subject><subject>Welfare Services</subject><issn>0034-6764</issn><issn>1470-1162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d1rFDEQAPAgFjyrf4APwoIgPrjtzCaZTUCQo_WjcCD49RqyuWzZI7epyV6l_71ZV3zQapOHQOY3M_lg7AnCCYKCUwAuqCVNsIzmHluhaKFGpOY-W83xugDxgD3MeQeAXElasZPzWH2a7OTrjb_2ofpq02C74HO17nvvpup8uI7J-epjMfn1I3bU25D941_rMfvy9s3ns_f15sO7i7P1pnZSwVQ30EvZdbYTyHXnUIktOQ3UE2iurFCCGrIgJNfoGt06pWWnuOqww62VwI_Z86XuVYrfDj5PZj9k50Owo4-HbAgFVy3QnVC2Coi4LPDFfyECJyGJsCn02R90Fw9pLPc12GpsgWs5q5eLurTBm2Hs45Ssu_SjTzbE0fdD2V6j4m2jf_avb-Flbv1-cLd5XLxLMefke3OVhr1NN-WkZv5y89eXl5ynS84uTzH9TigPTFo182O9WuJz-7S332MKWzPZmxBTn-zohmz4v8v_ANaptK0</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>Kate, Sweezy</creator><creator>Jill, Tiefenthaler</creator><general>Association for Social Economics</general><general>Routledge Journals</general><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?</title><author>Kate, Sweezy ; Jill, Tiefenthaler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>AFDC</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Divorce law</topic><topic>Divorce rates</topic><topic>Divorced mothers</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>event history analysis</topic><topic>Food stamp program</topic><topic>Food Stamps</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Marital property</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>No fault divorces</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Property law</topic><topic>Public assistance programs</topic><topic>Religious Fundamentalism</topic><topic>Social economics</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>State Society Relationship</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Welfare Recipients</topic><topic>Welfare Services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kate, Sweezy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jill, Tiefenthaler</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Review of social economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kate, Sweezy</au><au>Jill, Tiefenthaler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?</atitle><jtitle>Review of social economy</jtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>47-65</pages><issn>0034-6764</issn><eissn>1470-1162</eissn><coden>ROSEZZ</coden><abstract>Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the effects of state-level variables on individuals' decisions to divorce. In this study, state-level variables including AFDC and food stamp payments, property distribution laws, waiting periods, and two measures of conservatism are merged with a micro data set in order to examine the effects of these variables as well as individual-level variables on the probability of divorce. Event history analysis indicates that the effects of the individual-level variables are consistent with previous work. Among the state-level variables, only the percentage of regular church-goers and the percentage of fundamentalists in the state have a significant impact on divorce. These results reject notions that liberal divorce laws and generous AFDC payments encourage the breakup of families but support the hypothesis that social norms do influence individual behavior.</abstract><cop>Chicago, etc</cop><pub>Association for Social Economics</pub><doi>10.1080/00346769600000002</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-6764 |
ispartof | Review of social economy, 1996-04, Vol.54 (1), p.47-65 |
issn | 0034-6764 1470-1162 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61438706 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis Business Management & Economics Modern Archive; Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Humanities Index; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR |
subjects | AFDC Analysis Children Conservatism Divorce Divorce law Divorce rates Divorced mothers Economic aspects Evaluation event history analysis Food stamp program Food Stamps Human capital Law Laws, regulations and rules Marital property Marriage No fault divorces Norms Payments Pregnancy Property law Public assistance programs Religious Fundamentalism Social economics Social factors State Society Relationship USA Welfare Recipients Welfare Services |
title | Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20State-Level%20Variables%20Affect%20Divorce%20Rates?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20social%20economy&rft.au=Kate,%20Sweezy&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=47-65&rft.issn=0034-6764&rft.eissn=1470-1162&rft.coden=ROSEZZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00346769600000002&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA18372935%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791703952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A18372935&rft_jstor_id=29769826&rfr_iscdi=true |