Loading…

Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?

Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of social economy 1996-04, Vol.54 (1), p.47-65
Main Authors: Kate, Sweezy, Jill, Tiefenthaler
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title Review of social economy
container_volume 54
creator Kate, Sweezy
Jill, Tiefenthaler
description Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the effects of state-level variables on individuals' decisions to divorce. In this study, state-level variables including AFDC and food stamp payments, property distribution laws, waiting periods, and two measures of conservatism are merged with a micro data set in order to examine the effects of these variables as well as individual-level variables on the probability of divorce. Event history analysis indicates that the effects of the individual-level variables are consistent with previous work. Among the state-level variables, only the percentage of regular church-goers and the percentage of fundamentalists in the state have a significant impact on divorce. These results reject notions that liberal divorce laws and generous AFDC payments encourage the breakup of families but support the hypothesis that social norms do influence individual behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00346769600000002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61438706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A18372935</galeid><jstor_id>29769826</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A18372935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d1rFDEQAPAgFjyrf4APwoIgPrjtzCaZTUCQo_WjcCD49RqyuWzZI7epyV6l_71ZV3zQapOHQOY3M_lg7AnCCYKCUwAuqCVNsIzmHluhaKFGpOY-W83xugDxgD3MeQeAXElasZPzWH2a7OTrjb_2ofpq02C74HO17nvvpup8uI7J-epjMfn1I3bU25D941_rMfvy9s3ns_f15sO7i7P1pnZSwVQ30EvZdbYTyHXnUIktOQ3UE2iurFCCGrIgJNfoGt06pWWnuOqww62VwI_Z86XuVYrfDj5PZj9k50Owo4-HbAgFVy3QnVC2Coi4LPDFfyECJyGJsCn02R90Fw9pLPc12GpsgWs5q5eLurTBm2Hs45Ssu_SjTzbE0fdD2V6j4m2jf_avb-Flbv1-cLd5XLxLMefke3OVhr1NN-WkZv5y89eXl5ynS84uTzH9TigPTFo182O9WuJz-7S332MKWzPZmxBTn-zohmz4v8v_ANaptK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791703952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Business Management &amp; Economics Modern Archive</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Humanities Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Kate, Sweezy ; Jill, Tiefenthaler</creator><creatorcontrib>Kate, Sweezy ; Jill, Tiefenthaler</creatorcontrib><description>Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the effects of state-level variables on individuals' decisions to divorce. In this study, state-level variables including AFDC and food stamp payments, property distribution laws, waiting periods, and two measures of conservatism are merged with a micro data set in order to examine the effects of these variables as well as individual-level variables on the probability of divorce. Event history analysis indicates that the effects of the individual-level variables are consistent with previous work. Among the state-level variables, only the percentage of regular church-goers and the percentage of fundamentalists in the state have a significant impact on divorce. These results reject notions that liberal divorce laws and generous AFDC payments encourage the breakup of families but support the hypothesis that social norms do influence individual behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00346769600000002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ROSEZZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, etc: Association for Social Economics</publisher><subject>AFDC ; Analysis ; Children ; Conservatism ; Divorce ; Divorce law ; Divorce rates ; Divorced mothers ; Economic aspects ; Evaluation ; event history analysis ; Food stamp program ; Food Stamps ; Human capital ; Law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Marital property ; Marriage ; No fault divorces ; Norms ; Payments ; Pregnancy ; Property law ; Public assistance programs ; Religious Fundamentalism ; Social economics ; Social factors ; State Society Relationship ; USA ; Welfare Recipients ; Welfare Services</subject><ispartof>Review of social economy, 1996-04, Vol.54 (1), p.47-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1996</rights><rights>Association for Social Economics 1996</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 Routledge</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29769826$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29769826$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30999,33774,33849,58237,58470,60131,60920</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kate, Sweezy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jill, Tiefenthaler</creatorcontrib><title>Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?</title><title>Review of social economy</title><description>Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the effects of state-level variables on individuals' decisions to divorce. In this study, state-level variables including AFDC and food stamp payments, property distribution laws, waiting periods, and two measures of conservatism are merged with a micro data set in order to examine the effects of these variables as well as individual-level variables on the probability of divorce. Event history analysis indicates that the effects of the individual-level variables are consistent with previous work. Among the state-level variables, only the percentage of regular church-goers and the percentage of fundamentalists in the state have a significant impact on divorce. These results reject notions that liberal divorce laws and generous AFDC payments encourage the breakup of families but support the hypothesis that social norms do influence individual behavior.</description><subject>AFDC</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Divorce law</subject><subject>Divorce rates</subject><subject>Divorced mothers</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>event history analysis</subject><subject>Food stamp program</subject><subject>Food Stamps</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Marital property</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>No fault divorces</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Property law</subject><subject>Public assistance programs</subject><subject>Religious Fundamentalism</subject><subject>Social economics</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>State Society Relationship</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Welfare Recipients</subject><subject>Welfare Services</subject><issn>0034-6764</issn><issn>1470-1162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d1rFDEQAPAgFjyrf4APwoIgPrjtzCaZTUCQo_WjcCD49RqyuWzZI7epyV6l_71ZV3zQapOHQOY3M_lg7AnCCYKCUwAuqCVNsIzmHluhaKFGpOY-W83xugDxgD3MeQeAXElasZPzWH2a7OTrjb_2ofpq02C74HO17nvvpup8uI7J-epjMfn1I3bU25D941_rMfvy9s3ns_f15sO7i7P1pnZSwVQ30EvZdbYTyHXnUIktOQ3UE2iurFCCGrIgJNfoGt06pWWnuOqww62VwI_Z86XuVYrfDj5PZj9k50Owo4-HbAgFVy3QnVC2Coi4LPDFfyECJyGJsCn02R90Fw9pLPc12GpsgWs5q5eLurTBm2Hs45Ssu_SjTzbE0fdD2V6j4m2jf_avb-Flbv1-cLd5XLxLMefke3OVhr1NN-WkZv5y89eXl5ynS84uTzH9TigPTFo182O9WuJz-7S332MKWzPZmxBTn-zohmz4v8v_ANaptK0</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>Kate, Sweezy</creator><creator>Jill, Tiefenthaler</creator><general>Association for Social Economics</general><general>Routledge Journals</general><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?</title><author>Kate, Sweezy ; Jill, Tiefenthaler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>AFDC</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Divorce law</topic><topic>Divorce rates</topic><topic>Divorced mothers</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>event history analysis</topic><topic>Food stamp program</topic><topic>Food Stamps</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Marital property</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>No fault divorces</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Property law</topic><topic>Public assistance programs</topic><topic>Religious Fundamentalism</topic><topic>Social economics</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>State Society Relationship</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Welfare Recipients</topic><topic>Welfare Services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kate, Sweezy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jill, Tiefenthaler</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Review of social economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kate, Sweezy</au><au>Jill, Tiefenthaler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?</atitle><jtitle>Review of social economy</jtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>47-65</pages><issn>0034-6764</issn><eissn>1470-1162</eissn><coden>ROSEZZ</coden><abstract>Concerns over the increasing divorce rate and the negative effects of divorce on the standard of living of women and their children have resulted in a growing body of literature on both the causes and consequences of divorce. While several studies discuss the determinants of divorce, few examine the effects of state-level variables on individuals' decisions to divorce. In this study, state-level variables including AFDC and food stamp payments, property distribution laws, waiting periods, and two measures of conservatism are merged with a micro data set in order to examine the effects of these variables as well as individual-level variables on the probability of divorce. Event history analysis indicates that the effects of the individual-level variables are consistent with previous work. Among the state-level variables, only the percentage of regular church-goers and the percentage of fundamentalists in the state have a significant impact on divorce. These results reject notions that liberal divorce laws and generous AFDC payments encourage the breakup of families but support the hypothesis that social norms do influence individual behavior.</abstract><cop>Chicago, etc</cop><pub>Association for Social Economics</pub><doi>10.1080/00346769600000002</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6764
ispartof Review of social economy, 1996-04, Vol.54 (1), p.47-65
issn 0034-6764
1470-1162
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61438706
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis Business Management & Economics Modern Archive; Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Humanities Index; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR
subjects AFDC
Analysis
Children
Conservatism
Divorce
Divorce law
Divorce rates
Divorced mothers
Economic aspects
Evaluation
event history analysis
Food stamp program
Food Stamps
Human capital
Law
Laws, regulations and rules
Marital property
Marriage
No fault divorces
Norms
Payments
Pregnancy
Property law
Public assistance programs
Religious Fundamentalism
Social economics
Social factors
State Society Relationship
USA
Welfare Recipients
Welfare Services
title Do State-Level Variables Affect Divorce Rates?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20State-Level%20Variables%20Affect%20Divorce%20Rates?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20social%20economy&rft.au=Kate,%20Sweezy&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=47-65&rft.issn=0034-6764&rft.eissn=1470-1162&rft.coden=ROSEZZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00346769600000002&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA18372935%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-20f55bbab4139bc184d6c906f60938a484626a045391c297c895b838b1b1da503%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791703952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A18372935&rft_jstor_id=29769826&rfr_iscdi=true