The Strengths and Limitations of Case Record Reviews in Examining Family Preservation Outcome Formulation and Treatment Planning

Much debate has centered on what are reasonable outcomes of the short-term intensive family preservation services (IFPS). However, little attention has been given to how therapists actually formulate outcomes in their practices.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of child and family studies 1999-12, Vol.8 (4), p.409-424
Main Author: Staudt, Marlys
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic Achievement
Case Records
Child Safety
Child welfare
Child Welfare Services
Children
Contribution
Counseling
Electronic Mail
Family
Family counseling
Family preservation services
Family Relations
Family Therapy
Juvenile Justice
Mainstreaming
Medical treatment
Mental health
Mental Health Services
Outcome Measures
Parents
Planning
Planning methods
Psychology
Research Methodology
Researchers
Resistance (Psychology)
Respite Care
Reviews
Social Work
Social Work Cases
Teaching Methods
Therapy
Treatment
Treatment Outcomes
Welfare
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Much debate has centered on what are reasonable outcomes of the short-term intensive family preservation services (IFPS). However, little attention has been given to how therapists actually formulate outcomes in their practices.
ISSN:1062-1024
1573-2843
DOI:10.1023/A:1021947619389