Two-Dimensional Sociometric Status Determination with Rating Scales

Sociometric status is derivedfrom a concatenation ofjudgments at the individual leveL In previous articles, the authors argued that score attribution at this level (where one group member assesses another) is one-dimensional along the sympathy+-antipathy continuum. Two-dimensionality of sociometric...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Small group research 1996-02, Vol.27 (1), p.56-78
Main Authors: Maassen, Gerard H., Akkermans, Wies, Van Der Linden, Jos L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Computer Assisted Research
Determinants
Developmental psychology
Elementary School Students
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Groups
High School Students
Methodology (Data Analysis)
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Scales
Social Status
Sociometric Analysis
Sociometric status
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sociometric status is derivedfrom a concatenation ofjudgments at the individual leveL In previous articles, the authors argued that score attribution at this level (where one group member assesses another) is one-dimensional along the sympathy+-antipathy continuum. Two-dimensionality of sociometric status arises at the group level. It was shown that at this level, too, sympathy and antipathy are not two distinct dimensions but the poles ofjust one, the other being visibility (or impact). If one accepts the model of one-dimensional score attribution at the individual level, it would seem logical to base sociometric status determination on rating scales. In this article, a procedure for this is developed and a covering computer program (SSRAT) is introduced. Finally, the results of the current nomination methods and the proposed rating method applied in the same classroom groups are compared The results of the rating method appear to be more valid and more refined
ISSN:1046-4964
1552-8278
DOI:10.1177/1046496496271003