Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? Racial/Ethnic Context and the Anglo Vote on Proposition 187

Objective. We estimate the extent to which Anglo support for California Ballot Proposition 187 was a function of intergroup conflict. Methods. Using a multi variate probit model, we estimate the effects of racial context, ideology, and demographic factors on exit-poll data for Anglo voting on Propos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social science quarterly 2000-03, Vol.81 (1), p.194-206
Main Authors: Hood, M. V., Morris, Irwin L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Access
Asians
Attitudes
Bills
California
Censuses
Controversy
Ethnic Relations
Ethnicity
Health Care Services
Hispanics
Illegal immigrants
Illegal immigration
Immigrants
Immigration Policy
Intergroup Relations
Law (Proposition 187)
Legislation
Political aspects
Political attitudes
Political behaviour
Political Culture
Political Ideologies
Political partisanship
Political sociology
Polls
Population size
Public opinion
Public schools
Public Support
Race
Race Relations
Racial diversity
Referendums
Services
Social aspects
Social Conflict
Social Services
Sociodemographic Factors
Sociology
State Government (California)
The Politics
U.S.A
Undocumented Immigrants
USA
Voter behavior
Voting
Voting Behavior
Voting behaviour
Welfare rights movement
White people
Whites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 206
container_issue 1
container_start_page 194
container_title Social science quarterly
container_volume 81
creator Hood, M. V.
Morris, Irwin L.
description Objective. We estimate the extent to which Anglo support for California Ballot Proposition 187 was a function of intergroup conflict. Methods. Using a multi variate probit model, we estimate the effects of racial context, ideology, and demographic factors on exit-poll data for Anglo voting on Proposition 187. Results. We find no evidence that intergroup conflict played any role in Anglo vote choice on this issue. In contrast, we find that the dynamics associated with the contact hypothesis provide a useful explanation for the Anglo vote. Conclusions. Given the absence of an intergroup conflict result at the individual level, we must (1) provide an alternative explanation for aggregate-level results that does not rely on intergroup conflict or (2) identify the intergroup conflict dynamic that works only at the aggregate level.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61522322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A89871824</galeid><jstor_id>42864376</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A89871824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g547t-806c957f5e4c7cfb1432d2eec97ba4a1e25b60943db972af4ad7a39357087d5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0W2LVCEUAOBLFDRt_YRAKvq0l7x6fPsU07RtwULRG9SXy7le76zDHZ3Ugfr3uexSERMTCoo-Ho-eW82iE0Bbybi63Swo5boFA93d5l7OG0opMNCL5uuLFMulS6dkhYF8iXvyYYfJESQv_dY9J-_RepyfnZXL4C1ZxVDc90IwjKSeIsuwniP5HIsjMZB3Ke5i9sXXeafV_ebOhHN2D27Gk-bTq7OPq9ftxdvzN6vlRbsWoEqrqbRGqEk4sMpOQwecjcw5a9SAgJ1jYpDUAB8HoxhOgKNCbrhQVKtRDPykeXodd5fit73Lpd_6bN08Y3Bxn3vZCcZ47UchVRJUJ_8DCglg-FEoVH2i0eoo5FoLDkpX-OgvuIn7FOr_9YwCF7K6ih7_C3WiFt3UaqvfodY4u96HKZaE9urefqlrUp1mUNHpAbR2wSWcY3CTr8t_8vYAr210W28P-Sc3mWK2OE8Jg_W53yW_xfSjZgtGM1HZw2u2ySWmX9vAtASuJP8JTeDcAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554090037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? Racial/Ethnic Context and the Anglo Vote on Proposition 187</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hood, M. V. ; Morris, Irwin L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hood, M. V. ; Morris, Irwin L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. We estimate the extent to which Anglo support for California Ballot Proposition 187 was a function of intergroup conflict. Methods. Using a multi variate probit model, we estimate the effects of racial context, ideology, and demographic factors on exit-poll data for Anglo voting on Proposition 187. Results. We find no evidence that intergroup conflict played any role in Anglo vote choice on this issue. In contrast, we find that the dynamics associated with the contact hypothesis provide a useful explanation for the Anglo vote. Conclusions. Given the absence of an intergroup conflict result at the individual level, we must (1) provide an alternative explanation for aggregate-level results that does not rely on intergroup conflict or (2) identify the intergroup conflict dynamic that works only at the aggregate level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6237</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSQTAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, MA: University of Texas Press</publisher><subject>Access ; Asians ; Attitudes ; Bills ; California ; Censuses ; Controversy ; Ethnic Relations ; Ethnicity ; Health Care Services ; Hispanics ; Illegal immigrants ; Illegal immigration ; Immigrants ; Immigration Policy ; Intergroup Relations ; Law (Proposition 187) ; Legislation ; Political aspects ; Political attitudes ; Political behaviour ; Political Culture ; Political Ideologies ; Political partisanship ; Political sociology ; Polls ; Population size ; Public opinion ; Public schools ; Public Support ; Race ; Race Relations ; Racial diversity ; Referendums ; Services ; Social aspects ; Social Conflict ; Social Services ; Sociodemographic Factors ; Sociology ; State Government (California) ; The Politics ; U.S.A ; Undocumented Immigrants ; USA ; Voter behavior ; Voting ; Voting Behavior ; Voting behaviour ; Welfare rights movement ; White people ; Whites</subject><ispartof>Social science quarterly, 2000-03, Vol.81 (1), p.194-206</ispartof><rights>2000 University of Texas Press</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 University of Texas at Austin (University of Texas Press)</rights><rights>Copyright University of Texas at Austin (University of Texas Press) Mar 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42864376$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42864376$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,778,782,790,30983,33207,33758,58221,58454</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1549825$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hood, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Irwin L.</creatorcontrib><title>Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? Racial/Ethnic Context and the Anglo Vote on Proposition 187</title><title>Social science quarterly</title><description>Objective. We estimate the extent to which Anglo support for California Ballot Proposition 187 was a function of intergroup conflict. Methods. Using a multi variate probit model, we estimate the effects of racial context, ideology, and demographic factors on exit-poll data for Anglo voting on Proposition 187. Results. We find no evidence that intergroup conflict played any role in Anglo vote choice on this issue. In contrast, we find that the dynamics associated with the contact hypothesis provide a useful explanation for the Anglo vote. Conclusions. Given the absence of an intergroup conflict result at the individual level, we must (1) provide an alternative explanation for aggregate-level results that does not rely on intergroup conflict or (2) identify the intergroup conflict dynamic that works only at the aggregate level.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Bills</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Controversy</subject><subject>Ethnic Relations</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Hispanics</subject><subject>Illegal immigrants</subject><subject>Illegal immigration</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Immigration Policy</subject><subject>Intergroup Relations</subject><subject>Law (Proposition 187)</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political behaviour</subject><subject>Political Culture</subject><subject>Political Ideologies</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Political sociology</subject><subject>Polls</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>Public Support</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Race Relations</subject><subject>Racial diversity</subject><subject>Referendums</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Conflict</subject><subject>Social Services</subject><subject>Sociodemographic Factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>State Government (California)</subject><subject>The Politics</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Undocumented Immigrants</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><subject>Welfare rights movement</subject><subject>White people</subject><subject>Whites</subject><issn>0038-4941</issn><issn>1540-6237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0W2LVCEUAOBLFDRt_YRAKvq0l7x6fPsU07RtwULRG9SXy7le76zDHZ3Ugfr3uexSERMTCoo-Ho-eW82iE0Bbybi63Swo5boFA93d5l7OG0opMNCL5uuLFMulS6dkhYF8iXvyYYfJESQv_dY9J-_RepyfnZXL4C1ZxVDc90IwjKSeIsuwniP5HIsjMZB3Ke5i9sXXeafV_ebOhHN2D27Gk-bTq7OPq9ftxdvzN6vlRbsWoEqrqbRGqEk4sMpOQwecjcw5a9SAgJ1jYpDUAB8HoxhOgKNCbrhQVKtRDPykeXodd5fit73Lpd_6bN08Y3Bxn3vZCcZ47UchVRJUJ_8DCglg-FEoVH2i0eoo5FoLDkpX-OgvuIn7FOr_9YwCF7K6ih7_C3WiFt3UaqvfodY4u96HKZaE9urefqlrUp1mUNHpAbR2wSWcY3CTr8t_8vYAr210W28P-Sc3mWK2OE8Jg_W53yW_xfSjZgtGM1HZw2u2ySWmX9vAtASuJP8JTeDcAQ</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Hood, M. V.</creator><creator>Morris, Irwin L.</creator><general>University of Texas Press</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>University of Texas at Austin (University of Texas Press)</general><general>University of Texas Press, in cooperation with the Southwestern Social Science Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? Racial/Ethnic Context and the Anglo Vote on Proposition 187</title><author>Hood, M. V. ; Morris, Irwin L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g547t-806c957f5e4c7cfb1432d2eec97ba4a1e25b60943db972af4ad7a39357087d5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Bills</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Controversy</topic><topic>Ethnic Relations</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Hispanics</topic><topic>Illegal immigrants</topic><topic>Illegal immigration</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Immigration Policy</topic><topic>Intergroup Relations</topic><topic>Law (Proposition 187)</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political behaviour</topic><topic>Political Culture</topic><topic>Political Ideologies</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Political sociology</topic><topic>Polls</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>Public Support</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Race Relations</topic><topic>Racial diversity</topic><topic>Referendums</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Conflict</topic><topic>Social Services</topic><topic>Sociodemographic Factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>State Government (California)</topic><topic>The Politics</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Undocumented Immigrants</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><topic>Welfare rights movement</topic><topic>White people</topic><topic>Whites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hood, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Irwin L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hood, M. V.</au><au>Morris, Irwin L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? Racial/Ethnic Context and the Anglo Vote on Proposition 187</atitle><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>194-206</pages><issn>0038-4941</issn><eissn>1540-6237</eissn><coden>SSQTAL</coden><abstract>Objective. We estimate the extent to which Anglo support for California Ballot Proposition 187 was a function of intergroup conflict. Methods. Using a multi variate probit model, we estimate the effects of racial context, ideology, and demographic factors on exit-poll data for Anglo voting on Proposition 187. Results. We find no evidence that intergroup conflict played any role in Anglo vote choice on this issue. In contrast, we find that the dynamics associated with the contact hypothesis provide a useful explanation for the Anglo vote. Conclusions. Given the absence of an intergroup conflict result at the individual level, we must (1) provide an alternative explanation for aggregate-level results that does not rely on intergroup conflict or (2) identify the intergroup conflict dynamic that works only at the aggregate level.</abstract><cop>Malden, MA</cop><pub>University of Texas Press</pub><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-4941
ispartof Social science quarterly, 2000-03, Vol.81 (1), p.194-206
issn 0038-4941
1540-6237
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61522322
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Access
Asians
Attitudes
Bills
California
Censuses
Controversy
Ethnic Relations
Ethnicity
Health Care Services
Hispanics
Illegal immigrants
Illegal immigration
Immigrants
Immigration Policy
Intergroup Relations
Law (Proposition 187)
Legislation
Political aspects
Political attitudes
Political behaviour
Political Culture
Political Ideologies
Political partisanship
Political sociology
Polls
Population size
Public opinion
Public schools
Public Support
Race
Race Relations
Racial diversity
Referendums
Services
Social aspects
Social Conflict
Social Services
Sociodemographic Factors
Sociology
State Government (California)
The Politics
U.S.A
Undocumented Immigrants
USA
Voter behavior
Voting
Voting Behavior
Voting behaviour
Welfare rights movement
White people
Whites
title Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? Racial/Ethnic Context and the Anglo Vote on Proposition 187
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brother,%20Can%20You%20Spare%20a%20Dime?%20Racial/Ethnic%20Context%20and%20the%20Anglo%20Vote%20on%20Proposition%20187&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=Hood,%20M.%20V.&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=194-206&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft.coden=SSQTAL&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA89871824%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g547t-806c957f5e4c7cfb1432d2eec97ba4a1e25b60943db972af4ad7a39357087d5b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554090037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A89871824&rft_jstor_id=42864376&rfr_iscdi=true