An Evaluation of California's Enterprise Zone Programs

In 1984, California joined the growing list of states adopting enterprise zone legislation in an attempt to stimulate targeted business development and employment growth within economically distressed areas. This article reports on a first-ever assessment of whether California's two enterprise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economic development quarterly 1996-11, Vol.10 (4), p.352-368
Main Author: Dowall, David E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Business enterprises
Business investment
Business services
California
Development Policy
Development Programs
Economic activity
Economic Development
Economic incentives
Employment
Employment Changes
Employment creation
Enterprise zones
Enterprises
Evaluation
Incentives
Industrial promotion
Infrastructure
Labor sector
Legislation
Program Evaluation
Research methodology
Tax credits
Tax incentives
Tax increases
U.S.A
Unemployment relief
United States
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In 1984, California joined the growing list of states adopting enterprise zone legislation in an attempt to stimulate targeted business development and employment growth within economically distressed areas. This article reports on a first-ever assessment of whether California's two enterprise zone programs have stimulated employment. The existing Enterprise Zone and Economic Incentive Area programs (referred to in the article collectively as enterprise zone programs) have produced very modest economic benefits, and there is little evidence to suggest that they have strengthened the economic advantages of California's zones. Shift-share analysis indicates that employment growth was lower than predicted in 11 of 13 areas. A survey of businesses indicates that in only 23 cases did zone program incentives influence plant location or expansion decisions. In and of themselves, zone incentives and resources have apparently done little to boost job creation and business investment.
ISSN:0891-2424
1552-3543
DOI:10.1177/089124249601000405