A way through the maze: What futurists do and how they do it

Myriad methodologies, distinctly different study designs, conflicting definitions of key terms, and perpetual debate about purpose can give the impression that the futures field is a labyrinth of disorder. This sense disappears, however, once one perceives that, although deep differences in philosop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies planning and futures studies, 1993-04, Vol.25 (3), p.254-274
Main Author: Garrett, Martha J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Future
Futures (of Society)
Methodology (Philosophical)
Methods
Studies
Theoretical Problems
Theory
Time
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Myriad methodologies, distinctly different study designs, conflicting definitions of key terms, and perpetual debate about purpose can give the impression that the futures field is a labyrinth of disorder. This sense disappears, however, once one perceives that, although deep differences in philosophy do persist, much of the apparent disarray results from the multi-level nature of futures activities, the variation in emphasis given to common components of studies and projects, the creative adaptation of standard methods, and the degree to which underlying processes are acknowledged. An exhaustive analysis of details cannot provide the orientation needed to see this pattern, but it can be acquired by looking at the field from a more distanced perspective.
ISSN:0016-3287
1873-6378
DOI:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90136-H