Loading…
Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior
A persistent puzzle in the social and biological sciences is the existence of prosocial behavior, actions that benefit others, often at a cost to oneself. Recent theoretical models and empirical studies of indirect reciprocity show that actors behave prosocially in order to develop an altruistic rep...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social psychology quarterly 2008-03, Vol.71 (1), p.37-52 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-1a9ff0298614936c8f344c6d07f511797c888568ef64488227e6c69333c89363 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-1a9ff0298614936c8f344c6d07f511797c888568ef64488227e6c69333c89363 |
container_end_page | 52 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Social psychology quarterly |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Simpson, Brent Willer, Robb |
description | A persistent puzzle in the social and biological sciences is the existence of prosocial behavior, actions that benefit others, often at a cost to oneself. Recent theoretical models and empirical studies of indirect reciprocity show that actors behave prosocially in order to develop an altruistic reputation and receive future benefits from third parties. Accordingly, individuals should stop investing in reputations via prosocial behavior when a future benefit (via indirect reciprocity) is unlikely. The conclusion that the absence of reputational incentives necessarily leads to egoistic behavior contrasts sharply with models of heterogeneous social preferences. Such models demonstrate the theoretical plausibility of populations composed of egoists and altruists. Results of Study One show that actors classified a priori as egoists respond strategically to reputational incentives, whereas those classified a priori as altruists are less affected by these incentives. Egoists act prosocially when reputational incentives are at stake but not when opportunities for indirect reciprocity are absent, while altruists tend to act prosocially regardless of whether reputational incentives are present. These results suggest that altruistic behavior can result from non-strategic altruism or reputation-building egoism. Study Two replicates these results and explores indirect reciprocation of others' prosocial acts. We found that altruists indirectly reciprocate at higher levels than egoists, and individuals tend to discount others' prosocial behaviors when they occur in the presence of reputational incentives. As a result, public prosocial behaviors are indirectly reciprocated less than private prosocial behaviors. In line with our argument that altruists pay less attention to reputational incentives, egoists showed a greater tendency than altruists to discount others' public prosocial behaviors. The results support the growing focus on heterogeneity of individuals' social preferences in models of altruism and indirect reciprocity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/019027250807100106 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61681422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ889498</ericid><jstor_id>20141817</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_019027250807100106</sage_id><sourcerecordid>20141817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-1a9ff0298614936c8f344c6d07f511797c888568ef64488227e6c69333c89363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9LHTEQxUNpobfWL1AqLBb7tppJsvnTNyvaKoLS3vdtyE00l727NskW_PaddUWkRc1LQs7vZOZkCPkAdB9AqQMKhjLFGqqpAkqByldkAYabWhtjXpPFBNQT8Za8y3lNcQlpFuTXYVfSGPOmsv2qOu1XMXlXqh_exZs0uFhuv1TLa49K8cm6Eoe-GkJ16VPG0-T5Gcto7-5jX12mIaPLdtVXf23_xCG9J2-C7bLfvt-3yPLkeHn0vT6_-HZ6dHheu0aJUoM1IVBmtARhuHQ6cCGcXFEVGkxolNNaN1L7IIXQmjHlpZOGc-408nyLfJ6fxa5_jz6XdhOz811nez-MuZUgNQjGXgQbxbCAUi-CXFHWYL8I7v4Drocx9Ri2ZcCQwjEg9OkpCDCOVg2VgBSbKYf_mJMP7U2KG5tuW6DtNOj2_0Gjae_-aZud7UKyvYv5wcko440RU_KPM-dTdA_y8ZnWRhiN8sEsZ3vlH3X3XOGd2bHOZUiPCoIADYr_BY6KxC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1882875061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Simpson, Brent ; Willer, Robb</creator><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Brent ; Willer, Robb</creatorcontrib><description>A persistent puzzle in the social and biological sciences is the existence of prosocial behavior, actions that benefit others, often at a cost to oneself. Recent theoretical models and empirical studies of indirect reciprocity show that actors behave prosocially in order to develop an altruistic reputation and receive future benefits from third parties. Accordingly, individuals should stop investing in reputations via prosocial behavior when a future benefit (via indirect reciprocity) is unlikely. The conclusion that the absence of reputational incentives necessarily leads to egoistic behavior contrasts sharply with models of heterogeneous social preferences. Such models demonstrate the theoretical plausibility of populations composed of egoists and altruists. Results of Study One show that actors classified a priori as egoists respond strategically to reputational incentives, whereas those classified a priori as altruists are less affected by these incentives. Egoists act prosocially when reputational incentives are at stake but not when opportunities for indirect reciprocity are absent, while altruists tend to act prosocially regardless of whether reputational incentives are present. These results suggest that altruistic behavior can result from non-strategic altruism or reputation-building egoism. Study Two replicates these results and explores indirect reciprocation of others' prosocial acts. We found that altruists indirectly reciprocate at higher levels than egoists, and individuals tend to discount others' prosocial behaviors when they occur in the presence of reputational incentives. As a result, public prosocial behaviors are indirectly reciprocated less than private prosocial behaviors. In line with our argument that altruists pay less attention to reputational incentives, egoists showed a greater tendency than altruists to discount others' public prosocial behaviors. The results support the growing focus on heterogeneity of individuals' social preferences in models of altruism and indirect reciprocity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-2725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/019027250807100106</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPQUD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: American Sociological Association</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Behavior ; Behavior. Attitude ; Behavioural psychology ; Biological altruism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biology ; Charitable behavior ; College Students ; Dictators ; Economic models ; Egoism ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Incentives ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Laboratory Experiments ; Opportunities ; Preferences ; Prosocial Behavior ; Psychological Patterns ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reciprocal altruism ; Reciprocatory motion ; Reciprocity ; Reputation ; Reputations ; Self Concept ; Social Behavior ; Social behaviour ; Social Influences ; Social interaction ; Social psychology ; Social Values ; Studies ; Third parties ; Two on Exchange</subject><ispartof>Social psychology quarterly, 2008-03, Vol.71 (1), p.37-52</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>2008 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Sociological Association Mar 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-1a9ff0298614936c8f344c6d07f511797c888568ef64488227e6c69333c89363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-1a9ff0298614936c8f344c6d07f511797c888568ef64488227e6c69333c89363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20141817$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/212702939?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,12847,21378,21394,21395,27344,27924,27925,30999,31000,33223,33224,33611,33612,33774,33775,33877,33878,34530,34531,43733,43880,44115,58238,58471,62661,62662,62664,62677,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ889498$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20235942$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willer, Robb</creatorcontrib><title>Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior</title><title>Social psychology quarterly</title><addtitle>Soc Psychol Q</addtitle><description>A persistent puzzle in the social and biological sciences is the existence of prosocial behavior, actions that benefit others, often at a cost to oneself. Recent theoretical models and empirical studies of indirect reciprocity show that actors behave prosocially in order to develop an altruistic reputation and receive future benefits from third parties. Accordingly, individuals should stop investing in reputations via prosocial behavior when a future benefit (via indirect reciprocity) is unlikely. The conclusion that the absence of reputational incentives necessarily leads to egoistic behavior contrasts sharply with models of heterogeneous social preferences. Such models demonstrate the theoretical plausibility of populations composed of egoists and altruists. Results of Study One show that actors classified a priori as egoists respond strategically to reputational incentives, whereas those classified a priori as altruists are less affected by these incentives. Egoists act prosocially when reputational incentives are at stake but not when opportunities for indirect reciprocity are absent, while altruists tend to act prosocially regardless of whether reputational incentives are present. These results suggest that altruistic behavior can result from non-strategic altruism or reputation-building egoism. Study Two replicates these results and explores indirect reciprocation of others' prosocial acts. We found that altruists indirectly reciprocate at higher levels than egoists, and individuals tend to discount others' prosocial behaviors when they occur in the presence of reputational incentives. As a result, public prosocial behaviors are indirectly reciprocated less than private prosocial behaviors. In line with our argument that altruists pay less attention to reputational incentives, egoists showed a greater tendency than altruists to discount others' public prosocial behaviors. The results support the growing focus on heterogeneity of individuals' social preferences in models of altruism and indirect reciprocity.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior. Attitude</subject><subject>Behavioural psychology</subject><subject>Biological altruism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Charitable behavior</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Dictators</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Egoism</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Laboratory Experiments</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prosocial Behavior</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reciprocal altruism</subject><subject>Reciprocatory motion</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Reputation</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social behaviour</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Third parties</subject><subject>Two on Exchange</subject><issn>0190-2725</issn><issn>1939-8999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9LHTEQxUNpobfWL1AqLBb7tppJsvnTNyvaKoLS3vdtyE00l727NskW_PaddUWkRc1LQs7vZOZkCPkAdB9AqQMKhjLFGqqpAkqByldkAYabWhtjXpPFBNQT8Za8y3lNcQlpFuTXYVfSGPOmsv2qOu1XMXlXqh_exZs0uFhuv1TLa49K8cm6Eoe-GkJ16VPG0-T5Gcto7-5jX12mIaPLdtVXf23_xCG9J2-C7bLfvt-3yPLkeHn0vT6_-HZ6dHheu0aJUoM1IVBmtARhuHQ6cCGcXFEVGkxolNNaN1L7IIXQmjHlpZOGc-408nyLfJ6fxa5_jz6XdhOz811nez-MuZUgNQjGXgQbxbCAUi-CXFHWYL8I7v4Drocx9Ri2ZcCQwjEg9OkpCDCOVg2VgBSbKYf_mJMP7U2KG5tuW6DtNOj2_0Gjae_-aZud7UKyvYv5wcko440RU_KPM-dTdA_y8ZnWRhiN8sEsZ3vlH3X3XOGd2bHOZUiPCoIADYr_BY6KxC0</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Simpson, Brent</creator><creator>Willer, Robb</creator><general>American Sociological Association</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior</title><author>Simpson, Brent ; Willer, Robb</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-1a9ff0298614936c8f344c6d07f511797c888568ef64488227e6c69333c89363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior. Attitude</topic><topic>Behavioural psychology</topic><topic>Biological altruism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Charitable behavior</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Dictators</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Egoism</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Laboratory Experiments</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prosocial Behavior</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reciprocal altruism</topic><topic>Reciprocatory motion</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Reputation</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social behaviour</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Third parties</topic><topic>Two on Exchange</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willer, Robb</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social psychology quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simpson, Brent</au><au>Willer, Robb</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ889498</ericid><atitle>Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Social psychology quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Psychol Q</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>37-52</pages><issn>0190-2725</issn><eissn>1939-8999</eissn><coden>SPQUD6</coden><abstract>A persistent puzzle in the social and biological sciences is the existence of prosocial behavior, actions that benefit others, often at a cost to oneself. Recent theoretical models and empirical studies of indirect reciprocity show that actors behave prosocially in order to develop an altruistic reputation and receive future benefits from third parties. Accordingly, individuals should stop investing in reputations via prosocial behavior when a future benefit (via indirect reciprocity) is unlikely. The conclusion that the absence of reputational incentives necessarily leads to egoistic behavior contrasts sharply with models of heterogeneous social preferences. Such models demonstrate the theoretical plausibility of populations composed of egoists and altruists. Results of Study One show that actors classified a priori as egoists respond strategically to reputational incentives, whereas those classified a priori as altruists are less affected by these incentives. Egoists act prosocially when reputational incentives are at stake but not when opportunities for indirect reciprocity are absent, while altruists tend to act prosocially regardless of whether reputational incentives are present. These results suggest that altruistic behavior can result from non-strategic altruism or reputation-building egoism. Study Two replicates these results and explores indirect reciprocation of others' prosocial acts. We found that altruists indirectly reciprocate at higher levels than egoists, and individuals tend to discount others' prosocial behaviors when they occur in the presence of reputational incentives. As a result, public prosocial behaviors are indirectly reciprocated less than private prosocial behaviors. In line with our argument that altruists pay less attention to reputational incentives, egoists showed a greater tendency than altruists to discount others' public prosocial behaviors. The results support the growing focus on heterogeneity of individuals' social preferences in models of altruism and indirect reciprocity.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>American Sociological Association</pub><doi>10.1177/019027250807100106</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-2725 |
ispartof | Social psychology quarterly, 2008-03, Vol.71 (1), p.37-52 |
issn | 0190-2725 1939-8999 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61681422 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Altruism Behavior Behavior. Attitude Behavioural psychology Biological altruism Biological and medical sciences Biology Charitable behavior College Students Dictators Economic models Egoism Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Incentives Interpersonal Relationship Laboratory Experiments Opportunities Preferences Prosocial Behavior Psychological Patterns Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reciprocal altruism Reciprocatory motion Reciprocity Reputation Reputations Self Concept Social Behavior Social behaviour Social Influences Social interaction Social psychology Social Values Studies Third parties Two on Exchange |
title | Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Altruism%20and%20Indirect%20Reciprocity:%20The%20Interaction%20of%20Person%20and%20Situation%20in%20Prosocial%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Social%20psychology%20quarterly&rft.au=Simpson,%20Brent&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=37-52&rft.issn=0190-2725&rft.eissn=1939-8999&rft.coden=SPQUD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/019027250807100106&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20141817%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-1a9ff0298614936c8f344c6d07f511797c888568ef64488227e6c69333c89363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1882875061&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ889498&rft_jstor_id=20141817&rft_sage_id=10.1177_019027250807100106&rfr_iscdi=true |