Perception of Interannual Covariation and Strategies for Risk Reduction among Mikea of Madagascar : Individual and Social Learning

• Published in: Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2007-06, Vol.18 (2), p.162-180
• Main Author: Tucker, Bram
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cognitive psychology; Cultural anthropology; Farming; Food; Food supply; Herding; Learning; Madagascar; Native peoples; Perceptions; Rain; Rainfall; Risk; Risk reduction; Social Learning; Weather
• ISSN: 1045-6767; 1936-4776
• DOI: 10.1007/s12110-007-9007-z

This paper begins with the hypothesis that Mikea, participants in a mixed foraging-fishing-farming-herding economy of southwestern Madagascar, may attempt to reduce interannual variance in food supply caused by unpredictable rainfall by following a simple rule-of-thumb: Practice an even mix of activities that covary positively with rainfall and activities that covary negatively with rainfall. Results from a historical matrix participatory exercise confirm that Mikea perceive that foraging and farming outcomes covary positively or negatively with rainfall. This paper further considers whether Mikea learn about covariation through personal observation and memory recall (individual learning) or through socially transmitted ethnotheory (social learning). Dual inheritance theory models by Boyd and Richerson (1988) predict that individual learning is more effective in spatially and temporally variable environments such as the Mikea Forest. In contrast, the psychological literature suggests that individuals judge covariation poorly when memory of past events is required, unless they share a socially learned theory that a covariation should exist (Nisbett and Ross 1980). Results suggest that Mikea rely heavily on shared ethnotheory when judging covariation, but individuals continually strive to improve their judgment through individual observation.