Problem and Opportunity: Integrating Anthropology, Ecology, and Policy through Adaptive Experimentation in the Urban U.S. Southwest

• Published in: Human organization 2007-07, Vol.66 (2), p.125-139
• Main Authors: Casagrande, David G., Hope, Diane, Farley-Metzger, Elizabeth, Cook, William, Yabiku, Scott, Redman, Charles
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anthropologists; Anthropology; City Planning; Collaboration; Conservation; Cooperation; Deserts; Drinking water; Drought; Ecologists; Ecology; Ecosystems; Environmental social sciences; Ethics; Experiments; Human Ecology; Human subjects; Hypotheses; Interdisciplinary Approach; Interdisciplinary aspects; Interdisciplinary research; Landscape; Landscapes; Landscaping; Managers; Natural resource management; Natural Resources; Participation; Policy analysis; Politics; R&D; Rain; Research & development; Research methodology; Research Subjects; Resource Management; Social science research; Social sciences; Society; Special Section: Anthropology and Environmental Policy; Technological change; Theory; U.S.A; Urban areas; Urban ecology; Urban planning; Urban studies; Water conservation; Water consumption; Water management; Water resources; Water shortages; Water supply
• ISSN: 0018-7259; 1938-3525
• DOI: 10.17730/humo.66.2.h5277q2u27354358

Natural resource management agencies and governmental programs that fund research are increasingly calling for interdisciplinary research that integrates biological ecology and the social sciences in a way that can inform policy. One fundamental impediment to collaboration derives from the emphasis that biological scientists place on experimentation, which is generally not considered a viable option for anthropologists. We suggest that anthropologists could have additional influence on policy by collaborating with biological ecologists in manipulative experiments that include human subjects. Critical to this approach are the participation of research subjects in research planning and willingness on the part of social and biological scientists to rapidly adopt new hypotheses and control scenarios that may emerge from shifting political and ethical contexts—what we call "adaptive experimentation." We provide an example of an adaptive experiment being conducted at Arizona State University, which situates urban landscaping, water conservation, and human behavior within the context of problem definition in water management policy.