Loading…

The Gamblers' Conclave: Bets, Public Opinion and Continuity of the Papal Power in 16th-Century Rome

In 16th-century Rome, the most important scansions of a pontificate gave rise to numerous bets, which mobilized huge resources, & arose enthusiasm among the whole Roman society. The bettors' slips, which were often resold, indicated how probable they evaluated an event: thus they centralize...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annales : histoire, sciences sociales (French ed.) sciences sociales (French ed.), 2009-03, Vol.64 (2), p.375-403
Main Author: Villard, Renaud
Format: Article
Language:fre
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 403
container_issue 2
container_start_page 375
container_title Annales : histoire, sciences sociales (French ed.)
container_volume 64
creator Villard, Renaud
description In 16th-century Rome, the most important scansions of a pontificate gave rise to numerous bets, which mobilized huge resources, & arose enthusiasm among the whole Roman society. The bettors' slips, which were often resold, indicated how probable they evaluated an event: thus they centralized rumors & information. The out-of-control in bets gradually blurred reality: it became difficult to know if the deaths & elections of popes at the bookmakers' actually echoed real events outside. This disjunction had unexpected political consequences: by mimicking conclaves through betting, the Romans invented a new ritual that filled the political vacuum. Gamblers, as they assumed the attributes of sovereignty, unwillingly enabled the continuance of political power, & the progressive pacification of pontifical states. At the same time, the fear arose that the pope's election could be guided not by the Holy Spirit, but by financial interests: consequently, the popes started prohibiting those bets & restraining public speech, so that the princely secret would not be confiscated by the crowd. Adapted from the source document.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61739073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61739073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_617390733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy7sOgjAUgOEOmoiXdziTLpIUyyU4SrxsEsNOCh5CTWmRthrfXk18AKd_-f4R8ShLI38Th-mETI25UcoYjUKP1EWLcORdJXEwK8i0qiV_4BZ2aM0acldJUcO5F0poBVxdv8QK5YR9gW7Afvac91xCrp84gFAQxLb1M1TWDS-46A7nZNxwaXDx64wsD_siO_n9oO8OjS07YWqUkivUzpRxkLCUJoz9Dd8DxEa8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61739073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Gamblers' Conclave: Bets, Public Opinion and Continuity of the Papal Power in 16th-Century Rome</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Villard, Renaud</creator><creatorcontrib>Villard, Renaud</creatorcontrib><description>In 16th-century Rome, the most important scansions of a pontificate gave rise to numerous bets, which mobilized huge resources, &amp; arose enthusiasm among the whole Roman society. The bettors' slips, which were often resold, indicated how probable they evaluated an event: thus they centralized rumors &amp; information. The out-of-control in bets gradually blurred reality: it became difficult to know if the deaths &amp; elections of popes at the bookmakers' actually echoed real events outside. This disjunction had unexpected political consequences: by mimicking conclaves through betting, the Romans invented a new ritual that filled the political vacuum. Gamblers, as they assumed the attributes of sovereignty, unwillingly enabled the continuance of political power, &amp; the progressive pacification of pontifical states. At the same time, the fear arose that the pope's election could be guided not by the Holy Spirit, but by financial interests: consequently, the popes started prohibiting those bets &amp; restraining public speech, so that the princely secret would not be confiscated by the crowd. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0395-2649</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AESCBP</identifier><language>fre</language><subject>Elections ; Gambling ; Papacy ; Political Power ; Public Opinion ; Rituals ; Rome, Italy ; Sixteenth Century</subject><ispartof>Annales : histoire, sciences sociales (French ed.), 2009-03, Vol.64 (2), p.375-403</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villard, Renaud</creatorcontrib><title>The Gamblers' Conclave: Bets, Public Opinion and Continuity of the Papal Power in 16th-Century Rome</title><title>Annales : histoire, sciences sociales (French ed.)</title><description>In 16th-century Rome, the most important scansions of a pontificate gave rise to numerous bets, which mobilized huge resources, &amp; arose enthusiasm among the whole Roman society. The bettors' slips, which were often resold, indicated how probable they evaluated an event: thus they centralized rumors &amp; information. The out-of-control in bets gradually blurred reality: it became difficult to know if the deaths &amp; elections of popes at the bookmakers' actually echoed real events outside. This disjunction had unexpected political consequences: by mimicking conclaves through betting, the Romans invented a new ritual that filled the political vacuum. Gamblers, as they assumed the attributes of sovereignty, unwillingly enabled the continuance of political power, &amp; the progressive pacification of pontifical states. At the same time, the fear arose that the pope's election could be guided not by the Holy Spirit, but by financial interests: consequently, the popes started prohibiting those bets &amp; restraining public speech, so that the princely secret would not be confiscated by the crowd. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Gambling</subject><subject>Papacy</subject><subject>Political Power</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Rome, Italy</subject><subject>Sixteenth Century</subject><issn>0395-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy7sOgjAUgOEOmoiXdziTLpIUyyU4SrxsEsNOCh5CTWmRthrfXk18AKd_-f4R8ShLI38Th-mETI25UcoYjUKP1EWLcORdJXEwK8i0qiV_4BZ2aM0acldJUcO5F0poBVxdv8QK5YR9gW7Afvac91xCrp84gFAQxLb1M1TWDS-46A7nZNxwaXDx64wsD_siO_n9oO8OjS07YWqUkivUzpRxkLCUJoz9Dd8DxEa8</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Villard, Renaud</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>The Gamblers' Conclave: Bets, Public Opinion and Continuity of the Papal Power in 16th-Century Rome</title><author>Villard, Renaud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_617390733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Gambling</topic><topic>Papacy</topic><topic>Political Power</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Rome, Italy</topic><topic>Sixteenth Century</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villard, Renaud</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annales : histoire, sciences sociales (French ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villard, Renaud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Gamblers' Conclave: Bets, Public Opinion and Continuity of the Papal Power in 16th-Century Rome</atitle><jtitle>Annales : histoire, sciences sociales (French ed.)</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>375-403</pages><issn>0395-2649</issn><coden>AESCBP</coden><abstract>In 16th-century Rome, the most important scansions of a pontificate gave rise to numerous bets, which mobilized huge resources, &amp; arose enthusiasm among the whole Roman society. The bettors' slips, which were often resold, indicated how probable they evaluated an event: thus they centralized rumors &amp; information. The out-of-control in bets gradually blurred reality: it became difficult to know if the deaths &amp; elections of popes at the bookmakers' actually echoed real events outside. This disjunction had unexpected political consequences: by mimicking conclaves through betting, the Romans invented a new ritual that filled the political vacuum. Gamblers, as they assumed the attributes of sovereignty, unwillingly enabled the continuance of political power, &amp; the progressive pacification of pontifical states. At the same time, the fear arose that the pope's election could be guided not by the Holy Spirit, but by financial interests: consequently, the popes started prohibiting those bets &amp; restraining public speech, so that the princely secret would not be confiscated by the crowd. Adapted from the source document.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0395-2649
ispartof Annales : histoire, sciences sociales (French ed.), 2009-03, Vol.64 (2), p.375-403
issn 0395-2649
language fre
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61739073
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Elections
Gambling
Papacy
Political Power
Public Opinion
Rituals
Rome, Italy
Sixteenth Century
title The Gamblers' Conclave: Bets, Public Opinion and Continuity of the Papal Power in 16th-Century Rome
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A49%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Gamblers'%20Conclave:%20Bets,%20Public%20Opinion%20and%20Continuity%20of%20the%20Papal%20Power%20in%2016th-Century%20Rome&rft.jtitle=Annales%20:%20histoire,%20sciences%20sociales%20(French%20ed.)&rft.au=Villard,%20Renaud&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=375-403&rft.issn=0395-2649&rft.coden=AESCBP&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E61739073%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_617390733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61739073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true