Loading…

Environmental Alternatives and Social Goals

The main environmental decisions we have to make are social as well as scientific in nature. Lack of a consensus on environmental goals, insufficient understanding of opportunity costs, and the growth of an adversarial political process, all make informed decisionmaking difficult. These problems wil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1979-07, Vol.444 (1), p.102-111
Main Author: Heckert, Richard E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 111
container_issue 1
container_start_page 102
container_title The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
container_volume 444
creator Heckert, Richard E.
description The main environmental decisions we have to make are social as well as scientific in nature. Lack of a consensus on environmental goals, insufficient understanding of opportunity costs, and the growth of an adversarial political process, all make informed decisionmaking difficult. These problems will not be solved quickly or easily, since varying definitions of environmental protection-providing healthful living conditions for man vs. minimizing man's effect on nature-combine with differing political and social beliefs to create basic conflicts. But the process can be improved if those who are able to look at issues holistically and objectively foster interdisciplinary research into environmental problems. Political and social scientists can help by assessing opportunity costs, by clarifying the issues through analysis of the basic values of contending groups, and by communicating research results to the public, which should then be able to choose more wisely.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/000271627944400110
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61772619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1042430</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_000271627944400110</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1042430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-748c331f2c0312ae42b1a5bf590d9d4be7aaae33aa4baa32f60accdeb3331a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFLwzAQx4MoOKdfQHwYCL5I3V2SNs3jGHMKgg_uvVzTVDq6ZibdwG9va30YCmpeDsLv9z_ujrFLhDtEpaYAwBUmXGkpJQAiHLERxjGPhJD6mI16IOqJU3YWwhr6h3rEbhfNvvKu2dimpXoyq1vrG2qrvQ0TaorJizNV9790VIdzdlJ2xV581TFb3S9W84fo6Xn5OJ89RUYitpGSqRECS25AICcreY4U52WsodCFzK0iIisEkcyJBC8TIGMKm4vOIi7G7GaI3Xr3trOhzTZVMLauqbFuF7KkG5gnqP8BCpWk8d8gB0iVxLQDr7-Ba7fr9lGHDLlWArj-jOMDZbwLwdsy2_pqQ_49Q8j6c2Q_z9FJ00EK9GoPYn8zrgZjHVrnD3pILgWID3mGkXY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297302959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Alternatives and Social Goals</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012</source><creator>Heckert, Richard E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heckert, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><description>The main environmental decisions we have to make are social as well as scientific in nature. Lack of a consensus on environmental goals, insufficient understanding of opportunity costs, and the growth of an adversarial political process, all make informed decisionmaking difficult. These problems will not be solved quickly or easily, since varying definitions of environmental protection-providing healthful living conditions for man vs. minimizing man's effect on nature-combine with differing political and social beliefs to create basic conflicts. But the process can be improved if those who are able to look at issues holistically and objectively foster interdisciplinary research into environmental problems. Political and social scientists can help by assessing opportunity costs, by clarifying the issues through analysis of the basic values of contending groups, and by communicating research results to the public, which should then be able to choose more wisely.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000271627944400110</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAYPAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: American Academy of Political and Social Science</publisher><subject>Alternative/Alternatives ; Assumption of risk ; Business structures ; Businesspeople ; Chemicals industries ; Environment/Environments/ Environmental/ Environmentally ; Environmental technology ; Environmentalism ; Hydrocarbons ; Nature ; Political processes ; Social goal/Social goals ; Sustainable food systems</subject><ispartof>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1979-07, Vol.444 (1), p.102-111</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1042430$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1042430$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21843,27922,27923,33773,45080,45468,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heckert, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Alternatives and Social Goals</title><title>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</title><description>The main environmental decisions we have to make are social as well as scientific in nature. Lack of a consensus on environmental goals, insufficient understanding of opportunity costs, and the growth of an adversarial political process, all make informed decisionmaking difficult. These problems will not be solved quickly or easily, since varying definitions of environmental protection-providing healthful living conditions for man vs. minimizing man's effect on nature-combine with differing political and social beliefs to create basic conflicts. But the process can be improved if those who are able to look at issues holistically and objectively foster interdisciplinary research into environmental problems. Political and social scientists can help by assessing opportunity costs, by clarifying the issues through analysis of the basic values of contending groups, and by communicating research results to the public, which should then be able to choose more wisely.</description><subject>Alternative/Alternatives</subject><subject>Assumption of risk</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Businesspeople</subject><subject>Chemicals industries</subject><subject>Environment/Environments/ Environmental/ Environmentally</subject><subject>Environmental technology</subject><subject>Environmentalism</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Political processes</subject><subject>Social goal/Social goals</subject><subject>Sustainable food systems</subject><issn>0002-7162</issn><issn>1552-3349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVFLwzAQx4MoOKdfQHwYCL5I3V2SNs3jGHMKgg_uvVzTVDq6ZibdwG9va30YCmpeDsLv9z_ujrFLhDtEpaYAwBUmXGkpJQAiHLERxjGPhJD6mI16IOqJU3YWwhr6h3rEbhfNvvKu2dimpXoyq1vrG2qrvQ0TaorJizNV9790VIdzdlJ2xV581TFb3S9W84fo6Xn5OJ89RUYitpGSqRECS25AICcreY4U52WsodCFzK0iIisEkcyJBC8TIGMKm4vOIi7G7GaI3Xr3trOhzTZVMLauqbFuF7KkG5gnqP8BCpWk8d8gB0iVxLQDr7-Ba7fr9lGHDLlWArj-jOMDZbwLwdsy2_pqQ_49Q8j6c2Q_z9FJ00EK9GoPYn8zrgZjHVrnD3pILgWID3mGkXY</recordid><startdate>197907</startdate><enddate>197907</enddate><creator>Heckert, Richard E.</creator><general>American Academy of Political and Social Science</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>A. L. Hummel for the American Academy of Political and Social Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197907</creationdate><title>Environmental Alternatives and Social Goals</title><author>Heckert, Richard E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-748c331f2c0312ae42b1a5bf590d9d4be7aaae33aa4baa32f60accdeb3331a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Alternative/Alternatives</topic><topic>Assumption of risk</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Businesspeople</topic><topic>Chemicals industries</topic><topic>Environment/Environments/ Environmental/ Environmentally</topic><topic>Environmental technology</topic><topic>Environmentalism</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Political processes</topic><topic>Social goal/Social goals</topic><topic>Sustainable food systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heckert, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heckert, Richard E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Alternatives and Social Goals</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle><date>1979-07</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>444</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>102-111</pages><issn>0002-7162</issn><eissn>1552-3349</eissn><coden>AAYPAV</coden><abstract>The main environmental decisions we have to make are social as well as scientific in nature. Lack of a consensus on environmental goals, insufficient understanding of opportunity costs, and the growth of an adversarial political process, all make informed decisionmaking difficult. These problems will not be solved quickly or easily, since varying definitions of environmental protection-providing healthful living conditions for man vs. minimizing man's effect on nature-combine with differing political and social beliefs to create basic conflicts. But the process can be improved if those who are able to look at issues holistically and objectively foster interdisciplinary research into environmental problems. Political and social scientists can help by assessing opportunity costs, by clarifying the issues through analysis of the basic values of contending groups, and by communicating research results to the public, which should then be able to choose more wisely.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>American Academy of Political and Social Science</pub><doi>10.1177/000271627944400110</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7162
ispartof The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1979-07, Vol.444 (1), p.102-111
issn 0002-7162
1552-3349
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61772619
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012
subjects Alternative/Alternatives
Assumption of risk
Business structures
Businesspeople
Chemicals industries
Environment/Environments/ Environmental/ Environmentally
Environmental technology
Environmentalism
Hydrocarbons
Nature
Political processes
Social goal/Social goals
Sustainable food systems
title Environmental Alternatives and Social Goals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A33%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Alternatives%20and%20Social%20Goals&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Political%20and%20Social%20Science&rft.au=Heckert,%20Richard%20E.&rft.date=1979-07&rft.volume=444&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=102-111&rft.issn=0002-7162&rft.eissn=1552-3349&rft.coden=AAYPAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000271627944400110&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1042430%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-748c331f2c0312ae42b1a5bf590d9d4be7aaae33aa4baa32f60accdeb3331a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297302959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1042430&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000271627944400110&rfr_iscdi=true