On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil

Recent debate on the reasons for the informal sector has led to renewed focus on how to operationalize the measurement of informal employment. This paper investigates congruence between three empirical measures of the rate of informality using Brazilian household survey data for the period 1992–2004...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World development 2009-05, Vol.37 (5), p.992-1003
Main Authors: Henley, Andrew, Arabsheibani, G. Reza, Carneiro, Francisco G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Brazil
Conceptualization
Economic activity
Employment
Entrepreneurship
Households
Informal economy
informal employment
informal employment social protection entrepreneurship
Informal Sector
Measurement
Regression analysis
Social Policy
social protection
Studies
Surveys
Work organization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-9089c9e970c77e0570b53564a7a41eb7b3361ecb161012d96dcdd62aa0bf819c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-9089c9e970c77e0570b53564a7a41eb7b3361ecb161012d96dcdd62aa0bf819c3
container_end_page 1003
container_issue 5
container_start_page 992
container_title World development
container_volume 37
creator Henley, Andrew
Arabsheibani, G. Reza
Carneiro, Francisco G.
description Recent debate on the reasons for the informal sector has led to renewed focus on how to operationalize the measurement of informal employment. This paper investigates congruence between three empirical measures of the rate of informality using Brazilian household survey data for the period 1992–2004. Sixty-three percent of the economically active are informal according to at least one definition, but only 40% are informal according to all three. Regression analysis is used to shed further light on differences in these measures. Appropriate measurement is therefore of high significance to policy analysis and design of appropriate strategies to reduce informality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61785924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305750X08003136</els_id><sourcerecordid>1673449701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-9089c9e970c77e0570b53564a7a41eb7b3361ecb161012d96dcdd62aa0bf819c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1EJZaWv4AiDtwSxnZsx5yAbYGKVj0UJG6WY0-oV0m82Nmtyq_HqwUOXHp4Hll6b8bjj5CXFBoKVL7ZNPcxjd7jvmEAXQO6AUqfkBXtFK-F1vQpWQEHUSsB35-R5zlvAEBwrVZkfTNX5ziEOcw_Kjv76hpt3qXDbbnD6nIeYprsWN2iW2J6W13sg8fZYTWkOFUfkv0VxjNyMtgx44s_9ZR8-3jxdf25vrr5dLl-f1U72cql1tBpp1ErcEohCAW94EK2VtmWYq96ziVF11NZ1mJeS--8l8xa6IeOasdPyetj322KP3eYFzOF7HAc7Yxxl42kqhOatY8auaKtZEwW46v_jJu4S3NZwjCmJZNC02KSR5NLMeeEg9mmMNn0YCiYAwGzMX8JmAMBA9oUAiX45RhMuEX3L4WI98WKo9kbbrkqx0NRSepSQpEo2hZpzcoA4OZumUq3d8duWL54HzCZ7MIBhQ-pwDE-hsce9Btl-6pa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229626591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Henley, Andrew ; Arabsheibani, G. Reza ; Carneiro, Francisco G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henley, Andrew ; Arabsheibani, G. Reza ; Carneiro, Francisco G.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent debate on the reasons for the informal sector has led to renewed focus on how to operationalize the measurement of informal employment. This paper investigates congruence between three empirical measures of the rate of informality using Brazilian household survey data for the period 1992–2004. Sixty-three percent of the economically active are informal according to at least one definition, but only 40% are informal according to all three. Regression analysis is used to shed further light on differences in these measures. Appropriate measurement is therefore of high significance to policy analysis and design of appropriate strategies to reduce informality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Brazil ; Conceptualization ; Economic activity ; Employment ; Entrepreneurship ; Households ; Informal economy ; informal employment ; informal employment social protection entrepreneurship ; Informal Sector ; Measurement ; Regression analysis ; Social Policy ; social protection ; Studies ; Surveys ; Work organization</subject><ispartof>World development, 2009-05, Vol.37 (5), p.992-1003</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. May 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-9089c9e970c77e0570b53564a7a41eb7b3361ecb161012d96dcdd62aa0bf819c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-9089c9e970c77e0570b53564a7a41eb7b3361ecb161012d96dcdd62aa0bf819c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeewdevel/v_3a37_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a5_3ap_3a992-1003.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arabsheibani, G. Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Francisco G.</creatorcontrib><title>On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil</title><title>World development</title><description>Recent debate on the reasons for the informal sector has led to renewed focus on how to operationalize the measurement of informal employment. This paper investigates congruence between three empirical measures of the rate of informality using Brazilian household survey data for the period 1992–2004. Sixty-three percent of the economically active are informal according to at least one definition, but only 40% are informal according to all three. Regression analysis is used to shed further light on differences in these measures. Appropriate measurement is therefore of high significance to policy analysis and design of appropriate strategies to reduce informality.</description><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>informal employment</subject><subject>informal employment social protection entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Informal Sector</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>social protection</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Work organization</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1EJZaWv4AiDtwSxnZsx5yAbYGKVj0UJG6WY0-oV0m82Nmtyq_HqwUOXHp4Hll6b8bjj5CXFBoKVL7ZNPcxjd7jvmEAXQO6AUqfkBXtFK-F1vQpWQEHUSsB35-R5zlvAEBwrVZkfTNX5ziEOcw_Kjv76hpt3qXDbbnD6nIeYprsWN2iW2J6W13sg8fZYTWkOFUfkv0VxjNyMtgx44s_9ZR8-3jxdf25vrr5dLl-f1U72cql1tBpp1ErcEohCAW94EK2VtmWYq96ziVF11NZ1mJeS--8l8xa6IeOasdPyetj322KP3eYFzOF7HAc7Yxxl42kqhOatY8auaKtZEwW46v_jJu4S3NZwjCmJZNC02KSR5NLMeeEg9mmMNn0YCiYAwGzMX8JmAMBA9oUAiX45RhMuEX3L4WI98WKo9kbbrkqx0NRSepSQpEo2hZpzcoA4OZumUq3d8duWL54HzCZ7MIBhQ-pwDE-hsce9Btl-6pa</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Henley, Andrew</creator><creator>Arabsheibani, G. Reza</creator><creator>Carneiro, Francisco G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil</title><author>Henley, Andrew ; Arabsheibani, G. Reza ; Carneiro, Francisco G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-9089c9e970c77e0570b53564a7a41eb7b3361ecb161012d96dcdd62aa0bf819c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>informal employment</topic><topic>informal employment social protection entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Informal Sector</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>social protection</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Work organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arabsheibani, G. Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Francisco G.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henley, Andrew</au><au>Arabsheibani, G. Reza</au><au>Carneiro, Francisco G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>992</spage><epage>1003</epage><pages>992-1003</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>Recent debate on the reasons for the informal sector has led to renewed focus on how to operationalize the measurement of informal employment. This paper investigates congruence between three empirical measures of the rate of informality using Brazilian household survey data for the period 1992–2004. Sixty-three percent of the economically active are informal according to at least one definition, but only 40% are informal according to all three. Regression analysis is used to shed further light on differences in these measures. Appropriate measurement is therefore of high significance to policy analysis and design of appropriate strategies to reduce informality.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.011</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-750X
ispartof World development, 2009-05, Vol.37 (5), p.992-1003
issn 0305-750X
1873-5991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61785924
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Brazil
Conceptualization
Economic activity
Employment
Entrepreneurship
Households
Informal economy
informal employment
informal employment social protection entrepreneurship
Informal Sector
Measurement
Regression analysis
Social Policy
social protection
Studies
Surveys
Work organization
title On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A42%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20Defining%20and%20Measuring%20the%20Informal%20Sector:%20Evidence%20from%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Henley,%20Andrew&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=992&rft.epage=1003&rft.pages=992-1003&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1673449701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-9089c9e970c77e0570b53564a7a41eb7b3361ecb161012d96dcdd62aa0bf819c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229626591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true