Health Literacy in an Adult Dental Research Population: A Pilot Study

Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to gather data concerning the level of health literacy in adults who frequently volunteer for our clinical research programs. Methods: A convenience sample of 99 adults was recruited from our database of subjects taking part in an ongoing series of in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of public health dentistry 2008-09, Vol.68 (4), p.196-200
Main Authors: Jackson, Richard D., Eckert, George J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
assessment
Cohort Studies
Comprehension
Dental Research - standards
Dentistry
Educational Status
Female
Health Education - statistics & numerical data
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
health literacy
Humans
Indiana
Informed Consent
informed consent statements
literacy
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Pilot Projects
Research Design - standards
S-TOFHLA
Volunteers - statistics & numerical data
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to gather data concerning the level of health literacy in adults who frequently volunteer for our clinical research programs. Methods: A convenience sample of 99 adults was recruited from our database of subjects taking part in an ongoing series of investigations. Health literacy was measured using the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S‐TOFHLA). Additional demographic and socioeconomic data were collected by means of a questionnaire. Results: The results indicated that 13 percent of the cohort of subjects scored in the “inadequate” or “marginal” categories as described by the criteria of the S‐TOFHLA. Inadequate or marginal health literacy was associated with race, gender, and age. Unfortunately, the sample size was too small to determine the interaction of these variables. Conclusions: Dental faculty conducting clinical research investigations should be cognizant of the fact that a portion of adults, especially older adults, may have difficulty reading written instructions, informational letters of consent, prescriptions, and other documents. Researchers should make every effort to ensure that information provided in text form is provided in a manner that is easily understandable to the reader. Technical terminology and jargon should be avoided or if used, it should be explained in plain, simple language. If a potential subject is having difficulty, the investigator is obligated to take the additional time to educate the potential subject using alternative methods.
ISSN:0022-4006
1752-7325
DOI:10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00063.x