Loading…

Sonographic Diagnosis of Urethral Anomalies in Infants: Value of Perineal Sonography

To assess the value of urethral sonography including a perineal approach in evaluating urethral anomalies in infants. A radiology database review identified 88 patients (mean age +/- SD, 64 +/- 84 days) who underwent voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and urethral sonography as part of extended sonog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2004-06, Vol.23 (6), p.769-776
Main Authors: Schoellnast, Helmut, Lindbichler, Franz, Riccabona, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To assess the value of urethral sonography including a perineal approach in evaluating urethral anomalies in infants. A radiology database review identified 88 patients (mean age +/- SD, 64 +/- 84 days) who underwent voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and urethral sonography as part of extended sonography of the urinary tract. Sonographic and VCUG images and reports were reviewed to assess agreement between both modalities for detection of urethral anomalies. Sonography facilitated the correct diagnosis of all 3 posterior urethral valves. The only urethral diverticulum, the only ectopic ureteric insertion into the urethra, the only urogenital sinus, and the only urethrovaginal fistula were also shown on sonography. In 73 (94%) of 78 cases, sonography correctly showed the absence of anomalies. In 5 infants, sonography could not reliably assess the urethra and showed indirect signs of urethral anomalies; however, these patients had normal urethras on VCUG. Our data show that sonography of the urethra is a valuable tool for diagnosis of urethral anomalies. Especially, negative findings on sonography are highly suggestive of the absence of urethral anomalies. Positive or equivocal sonographic findings should indicate VCUG.
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.7863/jum.2004.23.6.769