Exploring face perception in disorders of development: Evidence from Williams syndrome and autism

Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) and autism are characterized by different social phenotypes but have been said to show similar atypicalities of face‐processing style. Although the structural encoding of faces may be similarly atypical in these two developmental disorders, there are clear dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuropsychology 2008-03, Vol.2 (1), p.47-64
Main Authors: Riby, Deborah M., Doherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth, Bruce, Vicki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Aging - psychology
Autistic Disorder - psychology
Child
Face
Facial Expression
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Lipreading
Male
Neuropsychological Tests
Prosopagnosia - etiology
Prosopagnosia - psychology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Recognition, Psychology - physiology
Social Perception
Vocabulary
Williams Syndrome - psychology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) and autism are characterized by different social phenotypes but have been said to show similar atypicalities of face‐processing style. Although the structural encoding of faces may be similarly atypical in these two developmental disorders, there are clear differences in overall face skills. The inclusion of both populations in the same study can address how the profile of face skills varies across disorders. The current paper explored the processing of identity, eye‐gaze, lip‐reading, and expressions of emotion using the same participants across face domains. The tasks had previously been used to make claims of a modular structure to face perception in typical development. Participants with WS (N=15) and autism (N=20) could be dissociated from each other, and from individuals with general developmental delay, in the domains of eye‐gaze and expression processing. Individuals with WS were stronger at these skills than individuals with autism. Even if the structural encoding of faces appears similarly atypical in these groups, the overall profile of face skills, as well as the underlying architecture of face perception, varies greatly. The research provides insights into typical and atypical models of face perception in WS and autism.
ISSN:1748-6645
1748-6653
DOI:10.1348/174866407X255690