Loading…

Chemical communication in proteobacteria: biochemical and structural studies of signal synthases and receptors required for intercellular signalling

Summary Cell–cell communication via the production and detection of chemical signal molecules has been the focus of a great deal of research over the past decade. One class of chemical signals widely used by proteobacteria consists of N‐acyl‐homoserine lactones, which are synthesized by proteins rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular microbiology 2004-08, Vol.53 (3), p.755-769
Main Authors: Pappas, Katherine M., Weingart, Christine L., Winans, Stephen C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Cell–cell communication via the production and detection of chemical signal molecules has been the focus of a great deal of research over the past decade. One class of chemical signals widely used by proteobacteria consists of N‐acyl‐homoserine lactones, which are synthesized by proteins related to LuxI of Vibrio fischeri and are detected by proteins related to the V. fischeri LuxR protein. A related marine bacterium, Vibrio harveyi, communicates using two chemical signals, one of which, autoinducer‐2 (AI‐2), is a furanone borate diester that is synthesized by the LuxS protein and detected by a periplasmic protein called LuxP. Evidence from a number of laboratories suggests that AI‐2 may be used as a signal by diverse groups of bacteria, and might permit intergeneric signalling. These two families of signalling systems have been studied from the perspectives of physiology, ecology, biochemistry, and more recently, structural biology. Here, we review the biochemistry and structural biology of both acyl‐homoserine‐lactone‐dependent and AI‐2‐dependent signalling systems.
ISSN:0950-382X
1365-2958
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04212.x