Loading…
The UK foot-and-mouth disease outbreak - the aftermath
The 2001 epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease in the United Kingdom triggered a livestock culling campaign that involved the slaughter of more than 6.5 million animals. Three years later, management of the epidemic remains controversial. Some believe that untried control methods based on unvalidated m...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Nature reviews. Microbiology 2004-08, Vol.2 (8), p.675-681 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2433e9e688bdf26e30849ec71967a87d4864f41f24724f33ac62c0412b8ae5f03 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2433e9e688bdf26e30849ec71967a87d4864f41f24724f33ac62c0412b8ae5f03 |
| container_end_page | 681 |
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 675 |
| container_title | Nature reviews. Microbiology |
| container_volume | 2 |
| creator | Haydon, Daniel T Kao, Rowland R Kitching, R. Paul |
| description | The 2001 epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease in the United Kingdom triggered a livestock culling campaign that involved the slaughter of more than 6.5 million animals. Three years later, management of the epidemic remains controversial. Some believe that untried control methods based on unvalidated models replaced well-established policy, motivating an unnecessary slaughter. Others hold that rigorous quantitative approaches provided the basis for new incisive policies that significantly curtailed the epidemic. Now, new and more flexible control policies have been adopted throughout Europe. For these policies to receive the full confidence of scientists, veterinarians and the general public, it is necessary that we improve both our understanding of where, how and why control measures initially failed in 2001 and how new policies should be implemented. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nrmicro960 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66722145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A188965904</galeid><sourcerecordid>A188965904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2433e9e688bdf26e30849ec71967a87d4864f41f24724f33ac62c0412b8ae5f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1LxDAQhoMofl_8AVIUPChd89U0PcriFy54cc8hbSe71bbRJD34783SxVWRHJKZeeZlMi9CJwRPCGbyunddUzlbCLyF9knOcUoyxre_31TsoQPvXzGmWZbTXbS3yrEC030kXpaQzJ8SY21IdV-nnR3CMqkbD9pDEoPSgX5L0iREUJsArtNheYR2jG49HK_vQzS_u32ZPqSz5_vH6c0srTLMQ0o5Y1CAkLKsDRXAsOQFVDkpRK5lXnMpuOHEUJ5TbhjTlaAV5oSWUkNmMDtEF6Puu7MfA_igusZX0La6Bzt4JUROKeFZBM_-gK92cH2cTVHKBZOCFBE6H6GFbkE1vbHB6WqlqG6IlIXICswjNfmHiqeGuGfbg2li_lfD5dgQTfDegVHvrum0-1QEq5VDauNQhE_Xgw5lB_UGXVsSgasR8LHUL8BtfvKvXDLSvQ6Dg2-5H8gX20Cjlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224638619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The UK foot-and-mouth disease outbreak - the aftermath</title><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Haydon, Daniel T ; Kao, Rowland R ; Kitching, R. Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Haydon, Daniel T ; Kao, Rowland R ; Kitching, R. Paul</creatorcontrib><description>The 2001 epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease in the United Kingdom triggered a livestock culling campaign that involved the slaughter of more than 6.5 million animals. Three years later, management of the epidemic remains controversial. Some believe that untried control methods based on unvalidated models replaced well-established policy, motivating an unnecessary slaughter. Others hold that rigorous quantitative approaches provided the basis for new incisive policies that significantly curtailed the epidemic. Now, new and more flexible control policies have been adopted throughout Europe. For these policies to receive the full confidence of scientists, veterinarians and the general public, it is necessary that we improve both our understanding of where, how and why control measures initially failed in 2001 and how new policies should be implemented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-1526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-1534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro960</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15263902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biofilms ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control ; Disease Outbreaks - veterinary ; Epidemics ; Foot & mouth disease ; Foot-and-Mouth Disease - epidemiology ; Foot-and-Mouth Disease - prevention & control ; Genomes ; Immunization ; Infectious Diseases ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Medical Microbiology ; Microbiology ; opinion-2 ; Parasitology ; Policy Making ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2004-08, Vol.2 (8), p.675-681</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2004</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2433e9e688bdf26e30849ec71967a87d4864f41f24724f33ac62c0412b8ae5f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2433e9e688bdf26e30849ec71967a87d4864f41f24724f33ac62c0412b8ae5f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2727,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15263902$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haydon, Daniel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Rowland R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitching, R. Paul</creatorcontrib><title>The UK foot-and-mouth disease outbreak - the aftermath</title><title>Nature reviews. Microbiology</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Microbiol</addtitle><description>The 2001 epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease in the United Kingdom triggered a livestock culling campaign that involved the slaughter of more than 6.5 million animals. Three years later, management of the epidemic remains controversial. Some believe that untried control methods based on unvalidated models replaced well-established policy, motivating an unnecessary slaughter. Others hold that rigorous quantitative approaches provided the basis for new incisive policies that significantly curtailed the epidemic. Now, new and more flexible control policies have been adopted throughout Europe. For these policies to receive the full confidence of scientists, veterinarians and the general public, it is necessary that we improve both our understanding of where, how and why control measures initially failed in 2001 and how new policies should be implemented.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - veterinary</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Foot & mouth disease</subject><subject>Foot-and-Mouth Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Foot-and-Mouth Disease - prevention & control</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>opinion-2</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>1740-1526</issn><issn>1740-1534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkU1LxDAQhoMofl_8AVIUPChd89U0PcriFy54cc8hbSe71bbRJD34783SxVWRHJKZeeZlMi9CJwRPCGbyunddUzlbCLyF9knOcUoyxre_31TsoQPvXzGmWZbTXbS3yrEC030kXpaQzJ8SY21IdV-nnR3CMqkbD9pDEoPSgX5L0iREUJsArtNheYR2jG49HK_vQzS_u32ZPqSz5_vH6c0srTLMQ0o5Y1CAkLKsDRXAsOQFVDkpRK5lXnMpuOHEUJ5TbhjTlaAV5oSWUkNmMDtEF6Puu7MfA_igusZX0La6Bzt4JUROKeFZBM_-gK92cH2cTVHKBZOCFBE6H6GFbkE1vbHB6WqlqG6IlIXICswjNfmHiqeGuGfbg2li_lfD5dgQTfDegVHvrum0-1QEq5VDauNQhE_Xgw5lB_UGXVsSgasR8LHUL8BtfvKvXDLSvQ6Dg2-5H8gX20Cjlg</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Haydon, Daniel T</creator><creator>Kao, Rowland R</creator><creator>Kitching, R. Paul</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>The UK foot-and-mouth disease outbreak - the aftermath</title><author>Haydon, Daniel T ; Kao, Rowland R ; Kitching, R. Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2433e9e688bdf26e30849ec71967a87d4864f41f24724f33ac62c0412b8ae5f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - veterinary</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Foot & mouth disease</topic><topic>Foot-and-Mouth Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Foot-and-Mouth Disease - prevention & control</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>opinion-2</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haydon, Daniel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Rowland R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitching, R. Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews. Microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haydon, Daniel T</au><au>Kao, Rowland R</au><au>Kitching, R. Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The UK foot-and-mouth disease outbreak - the aftermath</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Microbiology</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Microbiol</addtitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>675</spage><epage>681</epage><pages>675-681</pages><issn>1740-1526</issn><eissn>1740-1534</eissn><abstract>The 2001 epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease in the United Kingdom triggered a livestock culling campaign that involved the slaughter of more than 6.5 million animals. Three years later, management of the epidemic remains controversial. Some believe that untried control methods based on unvalidated models replaced well-established policy, motivating an unnecessary slaughter. Others hold that rigorous quantitative approaches provided the basis for new incisive policies that significantly curtailed the epidemic. Now, new and more flexible control policies have been adopted throughout Europe. For these policies to receive the full confidence of scientists, veterinarians and the general public, it is necessary that we improve both our understanding of where, how and why control measures initially failed in 2001 and how new policies should be implemented.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>15263902</pmid><doi>10.1038/nrmicro960</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1740-1526 |
| ispartof | Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2004-08, Vol.2 (8), p.675-681 |
| issn | 1740-1526 1740-1534 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66722145 |
| source | Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access |
| subjects | Animals Biofilms Biomedical and Life Sciences Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control Disease Outbreaks - veterinary Epidemics Foot & mouth disease Foot-and-Mouth Disease - epidemiology Foot-and-Mouth Disease - prevention & control Genomes Immunization Infectious Diseases Life Sciences Livestock Medical Microbiology Microbiology opinion-2 Parasitology Policy Making United Kingdom - epidemiology Virology |
| title | The UK foot-and-mouth disease outbreak - the aftermath |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A11%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20UK%20foot-and-mouth%20disease%20outbreak%20-%20the%20aftermath&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Microbiology&rft.au=Haydon,%20Daniel%20T&rft.date=2004-08&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=675&rft.epage=681&rft.pages=675-681&rft.issn=1740-1526&rft.eissn=1740-1534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nrmicro960&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA188965904%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2433e9e688bdf26e30849ec71967a87d4864f41f24724f33ac62c0412b8ae5f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224638619&rft_id=info:pmid/15263902&rft_galeid=A188965904&rfr_iscdi=true |