Loading…
Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results
Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displaceme...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ultrasonics 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.98-111 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203 |
container_end_page | 111 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 98 |
container_title | Ultrasonics |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Chen, Hao Varghese, Tomy Rahko, Peter S. Zagzebski, J.A. |
description | Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displacements and strain. Both tissue-mimicking phantoms under cyclic compressions at rates that mimic the contractions of the heart and
in vivo results are presented. Sinusoidal compressions were applied to the phantom at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cycles/sec, with a maximum deformation of 5% of the phantom height. Local displacements and strains were estimated using both a two-step one-dimensional and hybrid two-dimensional cross-correlation method. Accuracy and repeatability of local strains were assessed as a function of the ultrasound frame rate based on signal-to-noise ratio values.
The maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained in a uniformly elastic phantom is 20
dB for both a 1.26
Hz and a 2
Hz compression frequency when the radiofrequency echo acquisition is at least 12
Hz and 20
Hz respectively. However, for compression frequencies of 2.8
Hz and 4
Hz the maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained is around 16
dB even for a 40
Hz frame rate. Our results indicate that unbiased estimation of displacements and strain require ultrasound frame rates greater than ten times the compression frequency, although a frame rate of about two times the compression frequency is sufficient to estimate the compression frequency imparted to the tissue-mimicking phantom.
In vivo results derived from short-axis views of the heart acquired from normal human volunteers also demonstrate this frame rate requirement for elastography. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66727922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041624X08000978</els_id><sourcerecordid>66727922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EgvL4BwjlxC1hnaS2wwEJVeUhIXEBiQuyts4aXKVJsZOK_ntcWokbF68PM7OzH2PnHDIOXFzNs6HpPYYsB1AZjDMAucdGXMkyrSqh9tkIoOSpyMu3I3YcwhyAl4oXh-yIKzGWqqhG7P31N6Qb2jqxHheUeOzjQ1-D87Sgtg-J7Xxi0NcOTUINhr778Lj8XF8n0-8lebdRYZNgjHBtsnKrLvpDbBdO2YHFJtDZbp6w17vpy-QhfXq-f5zcPqWmENCntQC0YOVMGuIoiUhCrCeVMYKEsTnY2pTjUtCsNrj5VhIViJkSVmAOxQm73OYuffc1UOj1wgVDTYMtdUPQQshcVnkeheVWaHwXgierl7E_-rXmoDdY9VxvseoNVg1jHbFG28Uuf5gtqP4z7ThGwc1WQPHKlSOvg3HUGqojRdPrunP_b_gBPeSOPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66727922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Chen, Hao ; Varghese, Tomy ; Rahko, Peter S. ; Zagzebski, J.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hao ; Varghese, Tomy ; Rahko, Peter S. ; Zagzebski, J.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displacements and strain. Both tissue-mimicking phantoms under cyclic compressions at rates that mimic the contractions of the heart and
in vivo results are presented. Sinusoidal compressions were applied to the phantom at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cycles/sec, with a maximum deformation of 5% of the phantom height. Local displacements and strains were estimated using both a two-step one-dimensional and hybrid two-dimensional cross-correlation method. Accuracy and repeatability of local strains were assessed as a function of the ultrasound frame rate based on signal-to-noise ratio values.
The maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained in a uniformly elastic phantom is 20
dB for both a 1.26
Hz and a 2
Hz compression frequency when the radiofrequency echo acquisition is at least 12
Hz and 20
Hz respectively. However, for compression frequencies of 2.8
Hz and 4
Hz the maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained is around 16
dB even for a 40
Hz frame rate. Our results indicate that unbiased estimation of displacements and strain require ultrasound frame rates greater than ten times the compression frequency, although a frame rate of about two times the compression frequency is sufficient to estimate the compression frequency imparted to the tissue-mimicking phantom.
In vivo results derived from short-axis views of the heart acquired from normal human volunteers also demonstrate this frame rate requirement for elastography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-624X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-9968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18657839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cardiac deformation ; Cardiac imaging ; Displacement ; Echocardiography ; Echocardiography - methods ; Elastic Modulus ; Elasticity ; Elasticity imaging ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - instrumentation ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Elastogram ; Elastography ; Heart - physiology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Strain ; Stress, Mechanical ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Ultrasonics, 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.98-111</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Tomy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahko, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagzebski, J.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results</title><title>Ultrasonics</title><addtitle>Ultrasonics</addtitle><description>Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displacements and strain. Both tissue-mimicking phantoms under cyclic compressions at rates that mimic the contractions of the heart and
in vivo results are presented. Sinusoidal compressions were applied to the phantom at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cycles/sec, with a maximum deformation of 5% of the phantom height. Local displacements and strains were estimated using both a two-step one-dimensional and hybrid two-dimensional cross-correlation method. Accuracy and repeatability of local strains were assessed as a function of the ultrasound frame rate based on signal-to-noise ratio values.
The maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained in a uniformly elastic phantom is 20
dB for both a 1.26
Hz and a 2
Hz compression frequency when the radiofrequency echo acquisition is at least 12
Hz and 20
Hz respectively. However, for compression frequencies of 2.8
Hz and 4
Hz the maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained is around 16
dB even for a 40
Hz frame rate. Our results indicate that unbiased estimation of displacements and strain require ultrasound frame rates greater than ten times the compression frequency, although a frame rate of about two times the compression frequency is sufficient to estimate the compression frequency imparted to the tissue-mimicking phantom.
In vivo results derived from short-axis views of the heart acquired from normal human volunteers also demonstrate this frame rate requirement for elastography.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cardiac deformation</subject><subject>Cardiac imaging</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Elasticity imaging</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Elastogram</subject><subject>Elastography</subject><subject>Heart - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0041-624X</issn><issn>1874-9968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EgvL4BwjlxC1hnaS2wwEJVeUhIXEBiQuyts4aXKVJsZOK_ntcWokbF68PM7OzH2PnHDIOXFzNs6HpPYYsB1AZjDMAucdGXMkyrSqh9tkIoOSpyMu3I3YcwhyAl4oXh-yIKzGWqqhG7P31N6Qb2jqxHheUeOzjQ1-D87Sgtg-J7Xxi0NcOTUINhr778Lj8XF8n0-8lebdRYZNgjHBtsnKrLvpDbBdO2YHFJtDZbp6w17vpy-QhfXq-f5zcPqWmENCntQC0YOVMGuIoiUhCrCeVMYKEsTnY2pTjUtCsNrj5VhIViJkSVmAOxQm73OYuffc1UOj1wgVDTYMtdUPQQshcVnkeheVWaHwXgierl7E_-rXmoDdY9VxvseoNVg1jHbFG28Uuf5gtqP4z7ThGwc1WQPHKlSOvg3HUGqojRdPrunP_b_gBPeSOPw</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Chen, Hao</creator><creator>Varghese, Tomy</creator><creator>Rahko, Peter S.</creator><creator>Zagzebski, J.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results</title><author>Chen, Hao ; Varghese, Tomy ; Rahko, Peter S. ; Zagzebski, J.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cardiac deformation</topic><topic>Cardiac imaging</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Elasticity imaging</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Elastogram</topic><topic>Elastography</topic><topic>Heart - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Tomy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahko, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagzebski, J.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Hao</au><au>Varghese, Tomy</au><au>Rahko, Peter S.</au><au>Zagzebski, J.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasonics</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasonics</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>98-111</pages><issn>0041-624X</issn><eissn>1874-9968</eissn><abstract>Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displacements and strain. Both tissue-mimicking phantoms under cyclic compressions at rates that mimic the contractions of the heart and
in vivo results are presented. Sinusoidal compressions were applied to the phantom at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cycles/sec, with a maximum deformation of 5% of the phantom height. Local displacements and strains were estimated using both a two-step one-dimensional and hybrid two-dimensional cross-correlation method. Accuracy and repeatability of local strains were assessed as a function of the ultrasound frame rate based on signal-to-noise ratio values.
The maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained in a uniformly elastic phantom is 20
dB for both a 1.26
Hz and a 2
Hz compression frequency when the radiofrequency echo acquisition is at least 12
Hz and 20
Hz respectively. However, for compression frequencies of 2.8
Hz and 4
Hz the maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained is around 16
dB even for a 40
Hz frame rate. Our results indicate that unbiased estimation of displacements and strain require ultrasound frame rates greater than ten times the compression frequency, although a frame rate of about two times the compression frequency is sufficient to estimate the compression frequency imparted to the tissue-mimicking phantom.
In vivo results derived from short-axis views of the heart acquired from normal human volunteers also demonstrate this frame rate requirement for elastography.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18657839</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.007</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-624X |
ispartof | Ultrasonics, 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.98-111 |
issn | 0041-624X 1874-9968 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66727922 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Algorithms Cardiac deformation Cardiac imaging Displacement Echocardiography Echocardiography - methods Elastic Modulus Elasticity Elasticity imaging Elasticity Imaging Techniques - instrumentation Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods Elastogram Elastography Heart - physiology Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Phantoms, Imaging Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Strain Stress, Mechanical Ultrasound |
title | Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20frame%20rate%20requirements%20for%20cardiac%20elastography:%20Experimental%20and%20in%20vivo%20results&rft.jtitle=Ultrasonics&rft.au=Chen,%20Hao&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=98-111&rft.issn=0041-624X&rft.eissn=1874-9968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66727922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66727922&rft_id=info:pmid/18657839&rfr_iscdi=true |