Loading…

Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results

Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displaceme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ultrasonics 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.98-111
Main Authors: Chen, Hao, Varghese, Tomy, Rahko, Peter S., Zagzebski, J.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203
container_end_page 111
container_issue 1
container_start_page 98
container_title Ultrasonics
container_volume 49
creator Chen, Hao
Varghese, Tomy
Rahko, Peter S.
Zagzebski, J.A.
description Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displacements and strain. Both tissue-mimicking phantoms under cyclic compressions at rates that mimic the contractions of the heart and in vivo results are presented. Sinusoidal compressions were applied to the phantom at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cycles/sec, with a maximum deformation of 5% of the phantom height. Local displacements and strains were estimated using both a two-step one-dimensional and hybrid two-dimensional cross-correlation method. Accuracy and repeatability of local strains were assessed as a function of the ultrasound frame rate based on signal-to-noise ratio values. The maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained in a uniformly elastic phantom is 20 dB for both a 1.26 Hz and a 2 Hz compression frequency when the radiofrequency echo acquisition is at least 12 Hz and 20 Hz respectively. However, for compression frequencies of 2.8 Hz and 4 Hz the maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained is around 16 dB even for a 40 Hz frame rate. Our results indicate that unbiased estimation of displacements and strain require ultrasound frame rates greater than ten times the compression frequency, although a frame rate of about two times the compression frequency is sufficient to estimate the compression frequency imparted to the tissue-mimicking phantom. In vivo results derived from short-axis views of the heart acquired from normal human volunteers also demonstrate this frame rate requirement for elastography.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66727922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041624X08000978</els_id><sourcerecordid>66727922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EgvL4BwjlxC1hnaS2wwEJVeUhIXEBiQuyts4aXKVJsZOK_ntcWokbF68PM7OzH2PnHDIOXFzNs6HpPYYsB1AZjDMAucdGXMkyrSqh9tkIoOSpyMu3I3YcwhyAl4oXh-yIKzGWqqhG7P31N6Qb2jqxHheUeOzjQ1-D87Sgtg-J7Xxi0NcOTUINhr778Lj8XF8n0-8lebdRYZNgjHBtsnKrLvpDbBdO2YHFJtDZbp6w17vpy-QhfXq-f5zcPqWmENCntQC0YOVMGuIoiUhCrCeVMYKEsTnY2pTjUtCsNrj5VhIViJkSVmAOxQm73OYuffc1UOj1wgVDTYMtdUPQQshcVnkeheVWaHwXgierl7E_-rXmoDdY9VxvseoNVg1jHbFG28Uuf5gtqP4z7ThGwc1WQPHKlSOvg3HUGqojRdPrunP_b_gBPeSOPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66727922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Chen, Hao ; Varghese, Tomy ; Rahko, Peter S. ; Zagzebski, J.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hao ; Varghese, Tomy ; Rahko, Peter S. ; Zagzebski, J.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displacements and strain. Both tissue-mimicking phantoms under cyclic compressions at rates that mimic the contractions of the heart and in vivo results are presented. Sinusoidal compressions were applied to the phantom at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cycles/sec, with a maximum deformation of 5% of the phantom height. Local displacements and strains were estimated using both a two-step one-dimensional and hybrid two-dimensional cross-correlation method. Accuracy and repeatability of local strains were assessed as a function of the ultrasound frame rate based on signal-to-noise ratio values. The maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained in a uniformly elastic phantom is 20 dB for both a 1.26 Hz and a 2 Hz compression frequency when the radiofrequency echo acquisition is at least 12 Hz and 20 Hz respectively. However, for compression frequencies of 2.8 Hz and 4 Hz the maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained is around 16 dB even for a 40 Hz frame rate. Our results indicate that unbiased estimation of displacements and strain require ultrasound frame rates greater than ten times the compression frequency, although a frame rate of about two times the compression frequency is sufficient to estimate the compression frequency imparted to the tissue-mimicking phantom. In vivo results derived from short-axis views of the heart acquired from normal human volunteers also demonstrate this frame rate requirement for elastography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-624X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-9968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18657839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cardiac deformation ; Cardiac imaging ; Displacement ; Echocardiography ; Echocardiography - methods ; Elastic Modulus ; Elasticity ; Elasticity imaging ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - instrumentation ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Elastogram ; Elastography ; Heart - physiology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Strain ; Stress, Mechanical ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Ultrasonics, 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.98-111</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Tomy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahko, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagzebski, J.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results</title><title>Ultrasonics</title><addtitle>Ultrasonics</addtitle><description>Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displacements and strain. Both tissue-mimicking phantoms under cyclic compressions at rates that mimic the contractions of the heart and in vivo results are presented. Sinusoidal compressions were applied to the phantom at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cycles/sec, with a maximum deformation of 5% of the phantom height. Local displacements and strains were estimated using both a two-step one-dimensional and hybrid two-dimensional cross-correlation method. Accuracy and repeatability of local strains were assessed as a function of the ultrasound frame rate based on signal-to-noise ratio values. The maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained in a uniformly elastic phantom is 20 dB for both a 1.26 Hz and a 2 Hz compression frequency when the radiofrequency echo acquisition is at least 12 Hz and 20 Hz respectively. However, for compression frequencies of 2.8 Hz and 4 Hz the maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained is around 16 dB even for a 40 Hz frame rate. Our results indicate that unbiased estimation of displacements and strain require ultrasound frame rates greater than ten times the compression frequency, although a frame rate of about two times the compression frequency is sufficient to estimate the compression frequency imparted to the tissue-mimicking phantom. In vivo results derived from short-axis views of the heart acquired from normal human volunteers also demonstrate this frame rate requirement for elastography.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cardiac deformation</subject><subject>Cardiac imaging</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Elasticity imaging</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Elastogram</subject><subject>Elastography</subject><subject>Heart - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0041-624X</issn><issn>1874-9968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EgvL4BwjlxC1hnaS2wwEJVeUhIXEBiQuyts4aXKVJsZOK_ntcWokbF68PM7OzH2PnHDIOXFzNs6HpPYYsB1AZjDMAucdGXMkyrSqh9tkIoOSpyMu3I3YcwhyAl4oXh-yIKzGWqqhG7P31N6Qb2jqxHheUeOzjQ1-D87Sgtg-J7Xxi0NcOTUINhr778Lj8XF8n0-8lebdRYZNgjHBtsnKrLvpDbBdO2YHFJtDZbp6w17vpy-QhfXq-f5zcPqWmENCntQC0YOVMGuIoiUhCrCeVMYKEsTnY2pTjUtCsNrj5VhIViJkSVmAOxQm73OYuffc1UOj1wgVDTYMtdUPQQshcVnkeheVWaHwXgierl7E_-rXmoDdY9VxvseoNVg1jHbFG28Uuf5gtqP4z7ThGwc1WQPHKlSOvg3HUGqojRdPrunP_b_gBPeSOPw</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Chen, Hao</creator><creator>Varghese, Tomy</creator><creator>Rahko, Peter S.</creator><creator>Zagzebski, J.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results</title><author>Chen, Hao ; Varghese, Tomy ; Rahko, Peter S. ; Zagzebski, J.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cardiac deformation</topic><topic>Cardiac imaging</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Elasticity imaging</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Elastogram</topic><topic>Elastography</topic><topic>Heart - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Tomy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahko, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagzebski, J.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Hao</au><au>Varghese, Tomy</au><au>Rahko, Peter S.</au><au>Zagzebski, J.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasonics</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasonics</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>98-111</pages><issn>0041-624X</issn><eissn>1874-9968</eissn><abstract>Cardiac elastography using radiofrequency echo signals can provide improved 2D strain information compared to B-mode image data, provided data are acquired at sufficient frame rates. In this paper, we evaluate ultrasound frame rate requirements for unbiased and robust estimation of tissue displacements and strain. Both tissue-mimicking phantoms under cyclic compressions at rates that mimic the contractions of the heart and in vivo results are presented. Sinusoidal compressions were applied to the phantom at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cycles/sec, with a maximum deformation of 5% of the phantom height. Local displacements and strains were estimated using both a two-step one-dimensional and hybrid two-dimensional cross-correlation method. Accuracy and repeatability of local strains were assessed as a function of the ultrasound frame rate based on signal-to-noise ratio values. The maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained in a uniformly elastic phantom is 20 dB for both a 1.26 Hz and a 2 Hz compression frequency when the radiofrequency echo acquisition is at least 12 Hz and 20 Hz respectively. However, for compression frequencies of 2.8 Hz and 4 Hz the maximum signal-to-noise ratio obtained is around 16 dB even for a 40 Hz frame rate. Our results indicate that unbiased estimation of displacements and strain require ultrasound frame rates greater than ten times the compression frequency, although a frame rate of about two times the compression frequency is sufficient to estimate the compression frequency imparted to the tissue-mimicking phantom. In vivo results derived from short-axis views of the heart acquired from normal human volunteers also demonstrate this frame rate requirement for elastography.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18657839</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.007</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-624X
ispartof Ultrasonics, 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.98-111
issn 0041-624X
1874-9968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66727922
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Algorithms
Cardiac deformation
Cardiac imaging
Displacement
Echocardiography
Echocardiography - methods
Elastic Modulus
Elasticity
Elasticity imaging
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - instrumentation
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Elastogram
Elastography
Heart - physiology
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Phantoms, Imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Strain
Stress, Mechanical
Ultrasound
title Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: Experimental and in vivo results
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20frame%20rate%20requirements%20for%20cardiac%20elastography:%20Experimental%20and%20in%20vivo%20results&rft.jtitle=Ultrasonics&rft.au=Chen,%20Hao&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=98-111&rft.issn=0041-624X&rft.eissn=1874-9968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66727922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d60af0f7b7ce1a7eee7078378cc6e6cf20fdc4546ebdcadc4597a806b86f6a203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66727922&rft_id=info:pmid/18657839&rfr_iscdi=true