A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging

• Published in: Ultrasonics 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.120-125
• Main Authors: Crocco, M., Palmese, M., Sciallero, C., Trucco, A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Contrast Media; Echographic simulation; Image Enhancement - methods; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Microbubbles; Multi-pulse techniques; Phantoms, Imaging; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Ultrasonography - instrumentation; Ultrasonography - methods; Ultrasound contrast agents; Ultrasound medical imaging; Ultrasound signal processing
• ISSN: 0041-624X; 1874-9968
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.008

One of the important issues in the field of ultrasound medical imaging using contrast agents is the development of techniques able to separate the response of the contrast media from that of the biological tissues. In the literature, one can find various solutions involving the use of multiple transmitted signals and the combination of related echoes. However, the quality of these techniques may be reduced due to some undesired effects that are seldom considered, despite the fact that they are always present in real systems. These effects are the signal distortions introduced by the hardware equipment, the thermal noise in the electronic circuitry, and body motion between successive pulses. In this paper we propose a simulation tool that will allow the calculation of the backscattered echo from a population of contrast agents immersed in a biological tissue, considering all the mentioned effects. With this tool, an assessment of the comparative robustness of three well-known multi-pulse techniques has been carried out under realistic working conditions and the performance of the three techniques has been evaluated in terms of contrast-to-tissue ratio and signal-to-noise ratio. The results show that the undesired effects have a strong impact on these techniques and that there are notable differences in their robustness. Finally, some suggestions on the choice of the particular technique to be applied are provided on the basis of the specific work conditions.