Use of host population reduction to control wildlife infection: rabbits and paratuberculosis

• Published in: Epidemiology and infection 2009-01, Vol.137 (1), p.131-138
• Main Authors: DAVIDSON, R. S., MARION, G., WHITE, P. C. L., HUTCHINGS, M. R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal diseases; Animals; Badgers; Biological and medical sciences; Culling; Depopulation; Disease control; Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention & control; Epidemiology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Infection Control - methods; Infections; Livestock; Microbiology; Models, Theoretical; Mycobacteria; Mycobacterium avium; Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis - isolation & purification; Paratuberculosis; Paratuberculosis - prevention & control; Paratuberculosis - transmission; Population Control; Rabbits; Social groups; Stochastic models
• ISSN: 0950-2688; 1469-4409
• DOI: 10.1017/S0950268808000642

Reduction in wildlife populations is a common method for the control of livestock infections which have wildlife hosts, but its success is dependent on the characteristics of the infection itself, as well as on the spatial and social structure of the wildlife host. Paratuberculosis (Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis; Map) is a widespread and difficult infection to control in livestock populations and also has possible links to Crohn's disease in humans. Rabbits have recently been identified as a key wildlife species in terms of paratuberculosis persistence in the environment and risk to the wider host community, including cattle. Here we use a spatially explicit stochastic simulation model of Map dynamics in rabbit populations to quantify the effects of rabbit population control on infection persistence. The model parameters were estimated from empirical studies of rabbit population dynamics and rabbit-to-rabbit routes of Map transmission. Three rabbit control strategies were compared: single unrepeated population reductions based on removing individual animals; single unrepeated population reductions based on removal of entire social groups; and repeated annual population reductions based on removing individual animals. Unrealistically high rabbit culls (>95% population reduction) are needed if infection is to be eradicated from local rabbit populations with a single one-off population reduction event, either of individuals or social groups. Repeated annual culls are more effective at reducing the prevalence of infection in rabbit populations and eradicating infection. However, annual population reductions of >40% are required over extended periods of time (many years). Thus, using an approach which is both highly conservative and parsimonious with respect to estimating lower bounds on the time to eradicate the infection, we find that Map is extremely persistent in rabbit populations and requires significant and prolonged effort to achieve control.