Loading…
Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients
Background In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2009-01, Vol.99 (1), p.58-64 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3 |
container_end_page | 64 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 58 |
container_title | Journal of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Kim, Young-Wan Kim, Nam-Kyu Min, Byung-Soh Huh, Hyuk Kim, Jin-Soo Kim, Jeong-Yeon Sohn, Seung-Kook Cho, Chang-Hwan |
description | Background
In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic recurrence.
Methods
Thirty‐eight patients with anastomotic recurrence were compared with 876 patients who received curative rectal cancer surgery. Patients were compared according to: (1) the presence of anastomotic recurrence (recurrence vs. recurrence‐free), (2) distal margin length (≤10 mm vs. >10 mm) and (3) additional treatment (none, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant). The risk factors for anastomotic recurrence were analyzed.
Results
In the recurrence group, an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) (P = 0.01) microscopic distal margin involvement (P = 0.002) and an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml) (P = 0.04) were more commonly found. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence was not higher in the distal margin ≤10 mm group and did not differ according to additional treatment. The multivariate analysis showed that an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) and microscopic distal margin involvement were risk factors for anastomotic recurrence.
Conclusion
A distal margin ≤10 mm appears to be acceptable in terms of anastomotic recurrence. Patients with a positive distal margin, on the postoperative pathology, should be considered at high risk for anastomotic recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:58–64. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jso.21166 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66755251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66755251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PHDEQhi2UKByQgj-AXEVKsTDeD3tdEpQjHwgKiFJa9uysMOyuL7ZPwL9nyR1JRTWjeZ95i4exQwHHAqA8uUvhuBRCyh22EKBloUG379hizsqiVhp22V5KdwCgtaw_sF3R6kqVEhbsdmkxh5i4TSmgt5k6_uDzLbeTTTmMIXvkkXAdI01I3PaZIs8h24GPlMIcvaz0iD75MHE_8e0J7cxHvrLZ05TTAXvf2yHRx-3cZ7-WX2_OvhUXV-ffz04vCqykkIUrJTnhVC3Q6R5dJ6DtygpQW61sWSP0vSJwqCsnUTpddzUoa6FtG9dJrPbZp03vKoY_a0rZjD4hDYOdKKyTkVI1TdmIGfy8ATGGlCL1ZhX9aOOTEWBetJpZq_mrdWaPtqVrN1L3n9x6nIGTDfDgB3p6u8n8uL56rSw2Hz5levz3YeO9kapSjfl9eW7q5svy5mctjaqeAQYdk2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66755251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Kim, Young-Wan ; Kim, Nam-Kyu ; Min, Byung-Soh ; Huh, Hyuk ; Kim, Jin-Soo ; Kim, Jeong-Yeon ; Sohn, Seung-Kook ; Cho, Chang-Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Wan ; Kim, Nam-Kyu ; Min, Byung-Soh ; Huh, Hyuk ; Kim, Jin-Soo ; Kim, Jeong-Yeon ; Sohn, Seung-Kook ; Cho, Chang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>Background
In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic recurrence.
Methods
Thirty‐eight patients with anastomotic recurrence were compared with 876 patients who received curative rectal cancer surgery. Patients were compared according to: (1) the presence of anastomotic recurrence (recurrence vs. recurrence‐free), (2) distal margin length (≤10 mm vs. >10 mm) and (3) additional treatment (none, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant). The risk factors for anastomotic recurrence were analyzed.
Results
In the recurrence group, an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) (P = 0.01) microscopic distal margin involvement (P = 0.002) and an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml) (P = 0.04) were more commonly found. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence was not higher in the distal margin ≤10 mm group and did not differ according to additional treatment. The multivariate analysis showed that an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) and microscopic distal margin involvement were risk factors for anastomotic recurrence.
Conclusion
A distal margin ≤10 mm appears to be acceptable in terms of anastomotic recurrence. Patients with a positive distal margin, on the postoperative pathology, should be considered at high risk for anastomotic recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:58–64. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.21166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18937260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; anastomotic recurrence ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; distal margin ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; rectal neoplasm ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Rectum - pathology ; Risk Factors ; Survival Analysis ; total mesorectal excision</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2009-01, Vol.99 (1), p.58-64</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18937260$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam-Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Byung-Soh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jeong-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Seung-Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Chang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J. Surg. Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic recurrence.
Methods
Thirty‐eight patients with anastomotic recurrence were compared with 876 patients who received curative rectal cancer surgery. Patients were compared according to: (1) the presence of anastomotic recurrence (recurrence vs. recurrence‐free), (2) distal margin length (≤10 mm vs. >10 mm) and (3) additional treatment (none, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant). The risk factors for anastomotic recurrence were analyzed.
Results
In the recurrence group, an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) (P = 0.01) microscopic distal margin involvement (P = 0.002) and an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml) (P = 0.04) were more commonly found. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence was not higher in the distal margin ≤10 mm group and did not differ according to additional treatment. The multivariate analysis showed that an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) and microscopic distal margin involvement were risk factors for anastomotic recurrence.
Conclusion
A distal margin ≤10 mm appears to be acceptable in terms of anastomotic recurrence. Patients with a positive distal margin, on the postoperative pathology, should be considered at high risk for anastomotic recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:58–64. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>anastomotic recurrence</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>distal margin</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>rectal neoplasm</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Rectum - pathology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>total mesorectal excision</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PHDEQhi2UKByQgj-AXEVKsTDeD3tdEpQjHwgKiFJa9uysMOyuL7ZPwL9nyR1JRTWjeZ95i4exQwHHAqA8uUvhuBRCyh22EKBloUG379hizsqiVhp22V5KdwCgtaw_sF3R6kqVEhbsdmkxh5i4TSmgt5k6_uDzLbeTTTmMIXvkkXAdI01I3PaZIs8h24GPlMIcvaz0iD75MHE_8e0J7cxHvrLZ05TTAXvf2yHRx-3cZ7-WX2_OvhUXV-ffz04vCqykkIUrJTnhVC3Q6R5dJ6DtygpQW61sWSP0vSJwqCsnUTpddzUoa6FtG9dJrPbZp03vKoY_a0rZjD4hDYOdKKyTkVI1TdmIGfy8ATGGlCL1ZhX9aOOTEWBetJpZq_mrdWaPtqVrN1L3n9x6nIGTDfDgB3p6u8n8uL56rSw2Hz5levz3YeO9kapSjfl9eW7q5svy5mctjaqeAQYdk2g</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Kim, Young-Wan</creator><creator>Kim, Nam-Kyu</creator><creator>Min, Byung-Soh</creator><creator>Huh, Hyuk</creator><creator>Kim, Jin-Soo</creator><creator>Kim, Jeong-Yeon</creator><creator>Sohn, Seung-Kook</creator><creator>Cho, Chang-Hwan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients</title><author>Kim, Young-Wan ; Kim, Nam-Kyu ; Min, Byung-Soh ; Huh, Hyuk ; Kim, Jin-Soo ; Kim, Jeong-Yeon ; Sohn, Seung-Kook ; Cho, Chang-Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>anastomotic recurrence</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>distal margin</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>rectal neoplasm</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Rectum - pathology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>total mesorectal excision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam-Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Byung-Soh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jeong-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Seung-Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Chang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Young-Wan</au><au>Kim, Nam-Kyu</au><au>Min, Byung-Soh</au><au>Huh, Hyuk</au><au>Kim, Jin-Soo</au><au>Kim, Jeong-Yeon</au><au>Sohn, Seung-Kook</au><au>Cho, Chang-Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Surg. Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>58-64</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background
In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic recurrence.
Methods
Thirty‐eight patients with anastomotic recurrence were compared with 876 patients who received curative rectal cancer surgery. Patients were compared according to: (1) the presence of anastomotic recurrence (recurrence vs. recurrence‐free), (2) distal margin length (≤10 mm vs. >10 mm) and (3) additional treatment (none, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant). The risk factors for anastomotic recurrence were analyzed.
Results
In the recurrence group, an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) (P = 0.01) microscopic distal margin involvement (P = 0.002) and an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml) (P = 0.04) were more commonly found. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence was not higher in the distal margin ≤10 mm group and did not differ according to additional treatment. The multivariate analysis showed that an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) and microscopic distal margin involvement were risk factors for anastomotic recurrence.
Conclusion
A distal margin ≤10 mm appears to be acceptable in terms of anastomotic recurrence. Patients with a positive distal margin, on the postoperative pathology, should be considered at high risk for anastomotic recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:58–64. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18937260</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.21166</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4790 |
ispartof | Journal of surgical oncology, 2009-01, Vol.99 (1), p.58-64 |
issn | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66755251 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adenocarcinoma - surgery Anastomosis, Surgical anastomotic recurrence Digestive System Surgical Procedures distal margin Female Humans Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology rectal neoplasm Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Rectal Neoplasms - therapy Rectum - pathology Risk Factors Survival Analysis total mesorectal excision |
title | Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20anastomotic%20recurrence%20after%20total%20mesorectal%20excision%20in%20rectal%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Kim,%20Young-Wan&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=58-64&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.21166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66755251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66755251&rft_id=info:pmid/18937260&rfr_iscdi=true |