Loading…

Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients

Background In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surgical oncology 2009-01, Vol.99 (1), p.58-64
Main Authors: Kim, Young-Wan, Kim, Nam-Kyu, Min, Byung-Soh, Huh, Hyuk, Kim, Jin-Soo, Kim, Jeong-Yeon, Sohn, Seung-Kook, Cho, Chang-Hwan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3
container_end_page 64
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title Journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 99
creator Kim, Young-Wan
Kim, Nam-Kyu
Min, Byung-Soh
Huh, Hyuk
Kim, Jin-Soo
Kim, Jeong-Yeon
Sohn, Seung-Kook
Cho, Chang-Hwan
description Background In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic recurrence. Methods Thirty‐eight patients with anastomotic recurrence were compared with 876 patients who received curative rectal cancer surgery. Patients were compared according to: (1) the presence of anastomotic recurrence (recurrence vs. recurrence‐free), (2) distal margin length (≤10 mm vs. >10 mm) and (3) additional treatment (none, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant). The risk factors for anastomotic recurrence were analyzed. Results In the recurrence group, an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) (P = 0.01) microscopic distal margin involvement (P = 0.002) and an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml) (P = 0.04) were more commonly found. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence was not higher in the distal margin ≤10 mm group and did not differ according to additional treatment. The multivariate analysis showed that an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) and microscopic distal margin involvement were risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. Conclusion A distal margin ≤10 mm appears to be acceptable in terms of anastomotic recurrence. Patients with a positive distal margin, on the postoperative pathology, should be considered at high risk for anastomotic recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:58–64. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jso.21166
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66755251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66755251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PHDEQhi2UKByQgj-AXEVKsTDeD3tdEpQjHwgKiFJa9uysMOyuL7ZPwL9nyR1JRTWjeZ95i4exQwHHAqA8uUvhuBRCyh22EKBloUG379hizsqiVhp22V5KdwCgtaw_sF3R6kqVEhbsdmkxh5i4TSmgt5k6_uDzLbeTTTmMIXvkkXAdI01I3PaZIs8h24GPlMIcvaz0iD75MHE_8e0J7cxHvrLZ05TTAXvf2yHRx-3cZ7-WX2_OvhUXV-ffz04vCqykkIUrJTnhVC3Q6R5dJ6DtygpQW61sWSP0vSJwqCsnUTpddzUoa6FtG9dJrPbZp03vKoY_a0rZjD4hDYOdKKyTkVI1TdmIGfy8ATGGlCL1ZhX9aOOTEWBetJpZq_mrdWaPtqVrN1L3n9x6nIGTDfDgB3p6u8n8uL56rSw2Hz5levz3YeO9kapSjfl9eW7q5svy5mctjaqeAQYdk2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66755251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Kim, Young-Wan ; Kim, Nam-Kyu ; Min, Byung-Soh ; Huh, Hyuk ; Kim, Jin-Soo ; Kim, Jeong-Yeon ; Sohn, Seung-Kook ; Cho, Chang-Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Wan ; Kim, Nam-Kyu ; Min, Byung-Soh ; Huh, Hyuk ; Kim, Jin-Soo ; Kim, Jeong-Yeon ; Sohn, Seung-Kook ; Cho, Chang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>Background In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic recurrence. Methods Thirty‐eight patients with anastomotic recurrence were compared with 876 patients who received curative rectal cancer surgery. Patients were compared according to: (1) the presence of anastomotic recurrence (recurrence vs. recurrence‐free), (2) distal margin length (≤10 mm vs. &gt;10 mm) and (3) additional treatment (none, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant). The risk factors for anastomotic recurrence were analyzed. Results In the recurrence group, an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) (P = 0.01) microscopic distal margin involvement (P = 0.002) and an elevated CEA level (&gt;5 ng/ml) (P = 0.04) were more commonly found. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence was not higher in the distal margin ≤10 mm group and did not differ according to additional treatment. The multivariate analysis showed that an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) and microscopic distal margin involvement were risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. Conclusion A distal margin ≤10 mm appears to be acceptable in terms of anastomotic recurrence. Patients with a positive distal margin, on the postoperative pathology, should be considered at high risk for anastomotic recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:58–64. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.21166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18937260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; anastomotic recurrence ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; distal margin ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; rectal neoplasm ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Rectum - pathology ; Risk Factors ; Survival Analysis ; total mesorectal excision</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2009-01, Vol.99 (1), p.58-64</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18937260$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam-Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Byung-Soh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jeong-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Seung-Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Chang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J. Surg. Oncol</addtitle><description>Background In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic recurrence. Methods Thirty‐eight patients with anastomotic recurrence were compared with 876 patients who received curative rectal cancer surgery. Patients were compared according to: (1) the presence of anastomotic recurrence (recurrence vs. recurrence‐free), (2) distal margin length (≤10 mm vs. &gt;10 mm) and (3) additional treatment (none, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant). The risk factors for anastomotic recurrence were analyzed. Results In the recurrence group, an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) (P = 0.01) microscopic distal margin involvement (P = 0.002) and an elevated CEA level (&gt;5 ng/ml) (P = 0.04) were more commonly found. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence was not higher in the distal margin ≤10 mm group and did not differ according to additional treatment. The multivariate analysis showed that an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) and microscopic distal margin involvement were risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. Conclusion A distal margin ≤10 mm appears to be acceptable in terms of anastomotic recurrence. Patients with a positive distal margin, on the postoperative pathology, should be considered at high risk for anastomotic recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:58–64. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>anastomotic recurrence</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>distal margin</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>rectal neoplasm</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Rectum - pathology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>total mesorectal excision</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PHDEQhi2UKByQgj-AXEVKsTDeD3tdEpQjHwgKiFJa9uysMOyuL7ZPwL9nyR1JRTWjeZ95i4exQwHHAqA8uUvhuBRCyh22EKBloUG379hizsqiVhp22V5KdwCgtaw_sF3R6kqVEhbsdmkxh5i4TSmgt5k6_uDzLbeTTTmMIXvkkXAdI01I3PaZIs8h24GPlMIcvaz0iD75MHE_8e0J7cxHvrLZ05TTAXvf2yHRx-3cZ7-WX2_OvhUXV-ffz04vCqykkIUrJTnhVC3Q6R5dJ6DtygpQW61sWSP0vSJwqCsnUTpddzUoa6FtG9dJrPbZp03vKoY_a0rZjD4hDYOdKKyTkVI1TdmIGfy8ATGGlCL1ZhX9aOOTEWBetJpZq_mrdWaPtqVrN1L3n9x6nIGTDfDgB3p6u8n8uL56rSw2Hz5levz3YeO9kapSjfl9eW7q5svy5mctjaqeAQYdk2g</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Kim, Young-Wan</creator><creator>Kim, Nam-Kyu</creator><creator>Min, Byung-Soh</creator><creator>Huh, Hyuk</creator><creator>Kim, Jin-Soo</creator><creator>Kim, Jeong-Yeon</creator><creator>Sohn, Seung-Kook</creator><creator>Cho, Chang-Hwan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients</title><author>Kim, Young-Wan ; Kim, Nam-Kyu ; Min, Byung-Soh ; Huh, Hyuk ; Kim, Jin-Soo ; Kim, Jeong-Yeon ; Sohn, Seung-Kook ; Cho, Chang-Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>anastomotic recurrence</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>distal margin</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>rectal neoplasm</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Rectum - pathology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>total mesorectal excision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam-Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Byung-Soh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jeong-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Seung-Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Chang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Young-Wan</au><au>Kim, Nam-Kyu</au><au>Min, Byung-Soh</au><au>Huh, Hyuk</au><au>Kim, Jin-Soo</au><au>Kim, Jeong-Yeon</au><au>Sohn, Seung-Kook</au><au>Cho, Chang-Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Surg. Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>58-64</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background In patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME), the clinical variables most relevant to anastomotic recurrence have not been identified. We evaluated factors associated with anastomotic recurrence in patients undergoing TME and the impact of a reduced distal margin on anastomotic recurrence. Methods Thirty‐eight patients with anastomotic recurrence were compared with 876 patients who received curative rectal cancer surgery. Patients were compared according to: (1) the presence of anastomotic recurrence (recurrence vs. recurrence‐free), (2) distal margin length (≤10 mm vs. &gt;10 mm) and (3) additional treatment (none, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant). The risk factors for anastomotic recurrence were analyzed. Results In the recurrence group, an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) (P = 0.01) microscopic distal margin involvement (P = 0.002) and an elevated CEA level (&gt;5 ng/ml) (P = 0.04) were more commonly found. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence was not higher in the distal margin ≤10 mm group and did not differ according to additional treatment. The multivariate analysis showed that an advanced T stage (T3 and T4) and microscopic distal margin involvement were risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. Conclusion A distal margin ≤10 mm appears to be acceptable in terms of anastomotic recurrence. Patients with a positive distal margin, on the postoperative pathology, should be considered at high risk for anastomotic recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:58–64. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18937260</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.21166</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4790
ispartof Journal of surgical oncology, 2009-01, Vol.99 (1), p.58-64
issn 0022-4790
1096-9098
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66755251
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Anastomosis, Surgical
anastomotic recurrence
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
distal margin
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
rectal neoplasm
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Rectal Neoplasms - therapy
Rectum - pathology
Risk Factors
Survival Analysis
total mesorectal excision
title Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20anastomotic%20recurrence%20after%20total%20mesorectal%20excision%20in%20rectal%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Kim,%20Young-Wan&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=58-64&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.21166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66755251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-b26eb1b741cb9fcbd108d230c9a97a24c0ff7e0bc93b6c6b94d407aa0885bd6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66755251&rft_id=info:pmid/18937260&rfr_iscdi=true