Comparison of high-resolution MRI, optical microscopy and SEM for quantitation of trabecular architecture in the rat femur

• Published in: Magnetic resonance imaging 2004-09, Vol.22 (7), p.953-961
• Main Authors: Hopper, T.A.J, Meder, R, Pope, J.M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Femur - pathology; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; In Vitro Techniques; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Microscopy - methods; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Morphological parameters; MRI; Optical microscopy; Osteoporosis - pathology; Rats; Rats, Wistar; SEM; Trabecular bone
• ISSN: 0730-725X; 1873-5894
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.02.008

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to analyze trabecular bone architecture in femur heads taken from adult Wistar rats. The aim of this study was to validate the use of MRI in assessing trabecular structure and morphology by comparing standard measures of bone morphology in the rat femur obtained from high resolution MRI with those obtained by conventional optical microscopy and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MR images were obtained on a Bruker 4.7 T micro-imaging system using a three-dimensional spin echo sequence with spatial resolution of 23 μm in-plane and a slice thickness of 39 μm. Optical images were obtained by de-calcifying the bone in EDTA and then sectioning 5-μm-thick slices. SEM images were obtained from bone embedded in epoxy resin with surface preparation by diamond polishing. Values of standard bone morphological parameters were compared and correlation coefficients between the MRI and the optical- and SEM-derived measures of morphology were calculated. Partial volume effects in MRI were minimized in this study by the use of very thin slices, yielding better agreement with optical- and SEM-derived measures of trabecular bone morphology than have been obtained in previous studies. Correlations between the MRI and optical data were significantly lower than those between the MRI and SEM data. Effects of de-calcification were also investigated. The results indicate that comparison of MRI with thin (de-calcified) optical images may be inherently flawed due to the destructive de-calcification and sectioning process used to prepare samples for the optical imaging.