Loading…
Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?
Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the &qu...
Saved in:
Published in: | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience 2004-08, Vol.254 (4), p.215-223 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 223 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience |
container_volume | 254 |
creator | Henkel, Verena Mergl, Roland Coyne, James C Kohnen, Ralf Möller, Hans-Jürgen Hegerl, Ulrich |
description | Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the "WHO-5 Well Being Index" (WHO-5) and compared the obtained characteristics to those of the original version as well as to another proposed two-item screener (developed from PRIME-MD and BPHQ, respectively). Screening and diagnostic interview data from 431 primary care patients were analysed. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. All test characteristics were assessed using the diagnoses derived from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as the criterion standard.Single-item screening questions proved rather inadequate. However, only marginal differences in performance were found between two questions and the longer screening instrument with respect to major depression, dysthymia and "any depressive disorder". There were no statistically significant differences between these AUC values and most other test characteristics assessed. The results suggest that screening could be reduced to two questions with a potential advantage in terms of ease of administration and scoring and decreased staff and patient burden and perhaps a reduced stigma associated with a positive screening score. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00406-004-0476-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66785553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66785553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AC-yePC2Ovsv3XgRKWqFggd7X5LNRFKSbN1tKH57tzQgeJlh4DeP9x4h1xzuOcD8IQIoyFiaDNQ8Y_KETLmSkhmV81MyhVwB41KqCbmIcQMAXAs4JxOuJeTS5FOy_HQBsW_6L1r7QCvcBoyx8T1teroNTVeEH-qKgI9037Qt9T3SxO32njY77CKNQ103Dp8uyVldtBGvxj0j69eX9WLJVh9v74vnFXMyhx1zhUoWuMLKibIGUaJQ6NItVJnXyCtZFkYXWaW4Mcop4USKlyFIIbQp5IzcHWW3wX8PGHe2a6LDti169EO0WTY3WmuZwNt_4MYPoU_WrOCKawNSJ4gfIRd8jAFrO0a2HOyhYnus2KZpDxXbg_DNKDyUHVZ_H2On8hfqr3Vy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214158035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Henkel, Verena ; Mergl, Roland ; Coyne, James C ; Kohnen, Ralf ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen ; Hegerl, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Verena ; Mergl, Roland ; Coyne, James C ; Kohnen, Ralf ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen ; Hegerl, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the "WHO-5 Well Being Index" (WHO-5) and compared the obtained characteristics to those of the original version as well as to another proposed two-item screener (developed from PRIME-MD and BPHQ, respectively). Screening and diagnostic interview data from 431 primary care patients were analysed. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. All test characteristics were assessed using the diagnoses derived from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as the criterion standard.Single-item screening questions proved rather inadequate. However, only marginal differences in performance were found between two questions and the longer screening instrument with respect to major depression, dysthymia and "any depressive disorder". There were no statistically significant differences between these AUC values and most other test characteristics assessed. The results suggest that screening could be reduced to two questions with a potential advantage in terms of ease of administration and scoring and decreased staff and patient burden and perhaps a reduced stigma associated with a positive screening score.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-1334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00406-004-0476-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15309389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Area Under Curve ; Case-Control Studies ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Primary Health Care ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychological Tests</subject><ispartof>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2004-08, Vol.254 (4), p.215-223</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15309389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergl, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyne, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohnen, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegerl, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?</title><title>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the "WHO-5 Well Being Index" (WHO-5) and compared the obtained characteristics to those of the original version as well as to another proposed two-item screener (developed from PRIME-MD and BPHQ, respectively). Screening and diagnostic interview data from 431 primary care patients were analysed. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. All test characteristics were assessed using the diagnoses derived from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as the criterion standard.Single-item screening questions proved rather inadequate. However, only marginal differences in performance were found between two questions and the longer screening instrument with respect to major depression, dysthymia and "any depressive disorder". There were no statistically significant differences between these AUC values and most other test characteristics assessed. The results suggest that screening could be reduced to two questions with a potential advantage in terms of ease of administration and scoring and decreased staff and patient burden and perhaps a reduced stigma associated with a positive screening score.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><issn>0940-1334</issn><issn>1433-8491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AC-yePC2Ovsv3XgRKWqFggd7X5LNRFKSbN1tKH57tzQgeJlh4DeP9x4h1xzuOcD8IQIoyFiaDNQ8Y_KETLmSkhmV81MyhVwB41KqCbmIcQMAXAs4JxOuJeTS5FOy_HQBsW_6L1r7QCvcBoyx8T1teroNTVeEH-qKgI9037Qt9T3SxO32njY77CKNQ103Dp8uyVldtBGvxj0j69eX9WLJVh9v74vnFXMyhx1zhUoWuMLKibIGUaJQ6NItVJnXyCtZFkYXWaW4Mcop4USKlyFIIbQp5IzcHWW3wX8PGHe2a6LDti169EO0WTY3WmuZwNt_4MYPoU_WrOCKawNSJ4gfIRd8jAFrO0a2HOyhYnus2KZpDxXbg_DNKDyUHVZ_H2On8hfqr3Vy</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Henkel, Verena</creator><creator>Mergl, Roland</creator><creator>Coyne, James C</creator><creator>Kohnen, Ralf</creator><creator>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creator><creator>Hegerl, Ulrich</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?</title><author>Henkel, Verena ; Mergl, Roland ; Coyne, James C ; Kohnen, Ralf ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen ; Hegerl, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergl, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyne, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohnen, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegerl, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henkel, Verena</au><au>Mergl, Roland</au><au>Coyne, James C</au><au>Kohnen, Ralf</au><au>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</au><au>Hegerl, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?</atitle><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>254</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>215-223</pages><issn>0940-1334</issn><eissn>1433-8491</eissn><abstract>Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the "WHO-5 Well Being Index" (WHO-5) and compared the obtained characteristics to those of the original version as well as to another proposed two-item screener (developed from PRIME-MD and BPHQ, respectively). Screening and diagnostic interview data from 431 primary care patients were analysed. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. All test characteristics were assessed using the diagnoses derived from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as the criterion standard.Single-item screening questions proved rather inadequate. However, only marginal differences in performance were found between two questions and the longer screening instrument with respect to major depression, dysthymia and "any depressive disorder". There were no statistically significant differences between these AUC values and most other test characteristics assessed. The results suggest that screening could be reduced to two questions with a potential advantage in terms of ease of administration and scoring and decreased staff and patient burden and perhaps a reduced stigma associated with a positive screening score.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15309389</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00406-004-0476-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-1334 |
ispartof | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2004-08, Vol.254 (4), p.215-223 |
issn | 0940-1334 1433-8491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66785553 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aged Area Under Curve Case-Control Studies Depression - diagnosis Depression - epidemiology Female Humans Interview, Psychological - methods Male Middle Aged Primary Health Care Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychological Tests |
title | Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20for%20depression%20in%20primary%20care:%20will%20one%20or%20two%20items%20suffice?&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20psychiatry%20and%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Henkel,%20Verena&rft.date=2004-08&rft.volume=254&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=215-223&rft.issn=0940-1334&rft.eissn=1433-8491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00406-004-0476-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66785553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214158035&rft_id=info:pmid/15309389&rfr_iscdi=true |