Loading…

Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?

Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the &qu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience 2004-08, Vol.254 (4), p.215-223
Main Authors: Henkel, Verena, Mergl, Roland, Coyne, James C, Kohnen, Ralf, Möller, Hans-Jürgen, Hegerl, Ulrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3
cites
container_end_page 223
container_issue 4
container_start_page 215
container_title European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
container_volume 254
creator Henkel, Verena
Mergl, Roland
Coyne, James C
Kohnen, Ralf
Möller, Hans-Jürgen
Hegerl, Ulrich
description Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the "WHO-5 Well Being Index" (WHO-5) and compared the obtained characteristics to those of the original version as well as to another proposed two-item screener (developed from PRIME-MD and BPHQ, respectively). Screening and diagnostic interview data from 431 primary care patients were analysed. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. All test characteristics were assessed using the diagnoses derived from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as the criterion standard.Single-item screening questions proved rather inadequate. However, only marginal differences in performance were found between two questions and the longer screening instrument with respect to major depression, dysthymia and "any depressive disorder". There were no statistically significant differences between these AUC values and most other test characteristics assessed. The results suggest that screening could be reduced to two questions with a potential advantage in terms of ease of administration and scoring and decreased staff and patient burden and perhaps a reduced stigma associated with a positive screening score.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00406-004-0476-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66785553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66785553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AC-yePC2Ovsv3XgRKWqFggd7X5LNRFKSbN1tKH57tzQgeJlh4DeP9x4h1xzuOcD8IQIoyFiaDNQ8Y_KETLmSkhmV81MyhVwB41KqCbmIcQMAXAs4JxOuJeTS5FOy_HQBsW_6L1r7QCvcBoyx8T1teroNTVeEH-qKgI9037Qt9T3SxO32njY77CKNQ103Dp8uyVldtBGvxj0j69eX9WLJVh9v74vnFXMyhx1zhUoWuMLKibIGUaJQ6NItVJnXyCtZFkYXWaW4Mcop4USKlyFIIbQp5IzcHWW3wX8PGHe2a6LDti169EO0WTY3WmuZwNt_4MYPoU_WrOCKawNSJ4gfIRd8jAFrO0a2HOyhYnus2KZpDxXbg_DNKDyUHVZ_H2On8hfqr3Vy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214158035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Henkel, Verena ; Mergl, Roland ; Coyne, James C ; Kohnen, Ralf ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen ; Hegerl, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Verena ; Mergl, Roland ; Coyne, James C ; Kohnen, Ralf ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen ; Hegerl, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the "WHO-5 Well Being Index" (WHO-5) and compared the obtained characteristics to those of the original version as well as to another proposed two-item screener (developed from PRIME-MD and BPHQ, respectively). Screening and diagnostic interview data from 431 primary care patients were analysed. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. All test characteristics were assessed using the diagnoses derived from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as the criterion standard.Single-item screening questions proved rather inadequate. However, only marginal differences in performance were found between two questions and the longer screening instrument with respect to major depression, dysthymia and "any depressive disorder". There were no statistically significant differences between these AUC values and most other test characteristics assessed. The results suggest that screening could be reduced to two questions with a potential advantage in terms of ease of administration and scoring and decreased staff and patient burden and perhaps a reduced stigma associated with a positive screening score.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-1334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00406-004-0476-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15309389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Area Under Curve ; Case-Control Studies ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Primary Health Care ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychological Tests</subject><ispartof>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2004-08, Vol.254 (4), p.215-223</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15309389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergl, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyne, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohnen, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegerl, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?</title><title>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the "WHO-5 Well Being Index" (WHO-5) and compared the obtained characteristics to those of the original version as well as to another proposed two-item screener (developed from PRIME-MD and BPHQ, respectively). Screening and diagnostic interview data from 431 primary care patients were analysed. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. All test characteristics were assessed using the diagnoses derived from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as the criterion standard.Single-item screening questions proved rather inadequate. However, only marginal differences in performance were found between two questions and the longer screening instrument with respect to major depression, dysthymia and "any depressive disorder". There were no statistically significant differences between these AUC values and most other test characteristics assessed. The results suggest that screening could be reduced to two questions with a potential advantage in terms of ease of administration and scoring and decreased staff and patient burden and perhaps a reduced stigma associated with a positive screening score.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><issn>0940-1334</issn><issn>1433-8491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AC-yePC2Ovsv3XgRKWqFggd7X5LNRFKSbN1tKH57tzQgeJlh4DeP9x4h1xzuOcD8IQIoyFiaDNQ8Y_KETLmSkhmV81MyhVwB41KqCbmIcQMAXAs4JxOuJeTS5FOy_HQBsW_6L1r7QCvcBoyx8T1teroNTVeEH-qKgI9037Qt9T3SxO32njY77CKNQ103Dp8uyVldtBGvxj0j69eX9WLJVh9v74vnFXMyhx1zhUoWuMLKibIGUaJQ6NItVJnXyCtZFkYXWaW4Mcop4USKlyFIIbQp5IzcHWW3wX8PGHe2a6LDti169EO0WTY3WmuZwNt_4MYPoU_WrOCKawNSJ4gfIRd8jAFrO0a2HOyhYnus2KZpDxXbg_DNKDyUHVZ_H2On8hfqr3Vy</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Henkel, Verena</creator><creator>Mergl, Roland</creator><creator>Coyne, James C</creator><creator>Kohnen, Ralf</creator><creator>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creator><creator>Hegerl, Ulrich</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?</title><author>Henkel, Verena ; Mergl, Roland ; Coyne, James C ; Kohnen, Ralf ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen ; Hegerl, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergl, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyne, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohnen, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegerl, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henkel, Verena</au><au>Mergl, Roland</au><au>Coyne, James C</au><au>Kohnen, Ralf</au><au>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</au><au>Hegerl, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?</atitle><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>254</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>215-223</pages><issn>0940-1334</issn><eissn>1433-8491</eissn><abstract>Small differences in implementation of screening and the associated burden on clinicians and patients could have substantial effects on the sustainability of screening in routine primary care. Therefore, we investigated the psychometric properties of single items and two-item combinations of the "WHO-5 Well Being Index" (WHO-5) and compared the obtained characteristics to those of the original version as well as to another proposed two-item screener (developed from PRIME-MD and BPHQ, respectively). Screening and diagnostic interview data from 431 primary care patients were analysed. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and AUC values. All test characteristics were assessed using the diagnoses derived from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as the criterion standard.Single-item screening questions proved rather inadequate. However, only marginal differences in performance were found between two questions and the longer screening instrument with respect to major depression, dysthymia and "any depressive disorder". There were no statistically significant differences between these AUC values and most other test characteristics assessed. The results suggest that screening could be reduced to two questions with a potential advantage in terms of ease of administration and scoring and decreased staff and patient burden and perhaps a reduced stigma associated with a positive screening score.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15309389</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00406-004-0476-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-1334
ispartof European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2004-08, Vol.254 (4), p.215-223
issn 0940-1334
1433-8491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66785553
source Springer Nature
subjects Aged
Area Under Curve
Case-Control Studies
Depression - diagnosis
Depression - epidemiology
Female
Humans
Interview, Psychological - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Health Care
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychological Tests
title Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20for%20depression%20in%20primary%20care:%20will%20one%20or%20two%20items%20suffice?&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20psychiatry%20and%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Henkel,%20Verena&rft.date=2004-08&rft.volume=254&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=215-223&rft.issn=0940-1334&rft.eissn=1433-8491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00406-004-0476-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66785553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ca452014edc2bf02be24ec14e24b9fe1d3ba85a6d41884c42c20046e032258a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214158035&rft_id=info:pmid/15309389&rfr_iscdi=true