Loading…

Analyzing forms of superego functioning as mentalizations

The concept of mentalization seeks to understand the transformation processes of physical quantity into psychical quality through the emergence, development and organization of mental representations. Often discussed in relation to the functioning of both the id and the ego, it is here proposed that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of psychoanalysis 2004-08, Vol.85 (4), p.879-896
Main Authors: Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ, Lecours, Serge
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5009-1e6baa9412c1e2f4de82275eeddd5265bce1add7fe4c2858a37f83abcc279d583
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5009-1e6baa9412c1e2f4de82275eeddd5265bce1add7fe4c2858a37f83abcc279d583
container_end_page 896
container_issue 4
container_start_page 879
container_title International journal of psychoanalysis
container_volume 85
creator Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ
Lecours, Serge
description The concept of mentalization seeks to understand the transformation processes of physical quantity into psychical quality through the emergence, development and organization of mental representations. Often discussed in relation to the functioning of both the id and the ego, it is here proposed that the degree of mentalization also determines the level of functioning and maturity of the hostile, self-punitive superego. Luquet's description of four layers of thought (primary mental representations, metaprimary thinking, metaconscious intuitive thinking, conscious verbal thought) serves as a guide to explore issues of the forms of thinking involved in punitive superego activity. Technical implications are also examined to suggest that three steps can be differentiated in the developing capacity to represent the superego and to become conscious of its workings. The first objective is to help the ego observe its own activity, in the face of a still, unobserved hostile endopsychic agent (Gray, 1994). The second step is to meet the form and intentions of this agent, to facilitate its mental representation and elaboration. Achievement of the final step implies a growing capacity to take some responsibility for this hostile inner agent, once its activity is comparatively more available to self-observation.
doi_str_mv 10.1516/0AYK-3DCT-UQ87-WH4L
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66786734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66786734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5009-1e6baa9412c1e2f4de82275eeddd5265bce1add7fe4c2858a37f83abcc279d583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdtrFDEUh4Modl39CwQZEH2L5jK5zIuwXe1FF7XQWnwKmeRMGZ3Lmsywbv96M-zYvomBEEi-3zmcLwg9p-QNFVS-JavvnzB_v77EVxda4euzfPMALajKBdaciodoQQgjWAmlj9CTGH8QQrTi_DE6ooJTkjO5QMWqs83-tu5usqoPbcz6KovjFgLc9Fk1dm6o-256tTFroRtsU9_a6S4-RY8q20R4Np9LdHXy4XJ9hjdfTs_Xqw12gpACU5CltUVOmaPAqtyDZkwJAO-9YFKUDqj1XlWQO6aFtlxVmtvSOaYKLzRfoteHutvQ_xohDqato4OmsR30YzRSKi0VzxPID6ALfYwBKrMNdWvD3lBiJmNmMmYmY2YyZiZjKfViLj-WLfj7zKwoAa9mwEZnmyrYztXxnpOk0DytJVIHblc3sP-f3ub841etipR8OXeA7Q7Ku2h6NkSLtFWxShQ-UHUc4PcdZMNPk8ZXwlx_PjXy28mxvCjWhiT-3cx308_aXR8abwa7b_rwdwj-LzN_AEJYttw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66786734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing forms of superego functioning as mentalizations</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ ; Lecours, Serge</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ ; Lecours, Serge</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of mentalization seeks to understand the transformation processes of physical quantity into psychical quality through the emergence, development and organization of mental representations. Often discussed in relation to the functioning of both the id and the ego, it is here proposed that the degree of mentalization also determines the level of functioning and maturity of the hostile, self-punitive superego. Luquet's description of four layers of thought (primary mental representations, metaprimary thinking, metaconscious intuitive thinking, conscious verbal thought) serves as a guide to explore issues of the forms of thinking involved in punitive superego activity. Technical implications are also examined to suggest that three steps can be differentiated in the developing capacity to represent the superego and to become conscious of its workings. The first objective is to help the ego observe its own activity, in the face of a still, unobserved hostile endopsychic agent (Gray, 1994). The second step is to meet the form and intentions of this agent, to facilitate its mental representation and elaboration. Achievement of the final step implies a growing capacity to take some responsibility for this hostile inner agent, once its activity is comparatively more available to self-observation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-8315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1516/0AYK-3DCT-UQ87-WH4L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15310426</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPSAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Ego ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hostility ; Humans ; mental representation ; mentalization ; mindfulness ; Models, Psychological ; paul gray ; pierre luquet ; preconscious ; Psychoanalysis ; Psychoanalytic cure ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Punishment ; reflective function ; Self Psychology ; self-regulation ; superego analysis ; superego functioning ; thinking</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychoanalysis, 2004-08, Vol.85 (4), p.879-896</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Institute of Psychoanalysis 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5009-1e6baa9412c1e2f4de82275eeddd5265bce1add7fe4c2858a37f83abcc279d583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5009-1e6baa9412c1e2f4de82275eeddd5265bce1add7fe4c2858a37f83abcc279d583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16098333$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15310426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecours, Serge</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing forms of superego functioning as mentalizations</title><title>International journal of psychoanalysis</title><addtitle>Int J Psychoanal</addtitle><description>The concept of mentalization seeks to understand the transformation processes of physical quantity into psychical quality through the emergence, development and organization of mental representations. Often discussed in relation to the functioning of both the id and the ego, it is here proposed that the degree of mentalization also determines the level of functioning and maturity of the hostile, self-punitive superego. Luquet's description of four layers of thought (primary mental representations, metaprimary thinking, metaconscious intuitive thinking, conscious verbal thought) serves as a guide to explore issues of the forms of thinking involved in punitive superego activity. Technical implications are also examined to suggest that three steps can be differentiated in the developing capacity to represent the superego and to become conscious of its workings. The first objective is to help the ego observe its own activity, in the face of a still, unobserved hostile endopsychic agent (Gray, 1994). The second step is to meet the form and intentions of this agent, to facilitate its mental representation and elaboration. Achievement of the final step implies a growing capacity to take some responsibility for this hostile inner agent, once its activity is comparatively more available to self-observation.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Ego</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hostility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>mental representation</subject><subject>mentalization</subject><subject>mindfulness</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>paul gray</subject><subject>pierre luquet</subject><subject>preconscious</subject><subject>Psychoanalysis</subject><subject>Psychoanalytic cure</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>reflective function</subject><subject>Self Psychology</subject><subject>self-regulation</subject><subject>superego analysis</subject><subject>superego functioning</subject><subject>thinking</subject><issn>0020-7578</issn><issn>1745-8315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkdtrFDEUh4Modl39CwQZEH2L5jK5zIuwXe1FF7XQWnwKmeRMGZ3Lmsywbv96M-zYvomBEEi-3zmcLwg9p-QNFVS-JavvnzB_v77EVxda4euzfPMALajKBdaciodoQQgjWAmlj9CTGH8QQrTi_DE6ooJTkjO5QMWqs83-tu5usqoPbcz6KovjFgLc9Fk1dm6o-256tTFroRtsU9_a6S4-RY8q20R4Np9LdHXy4XJ9hjdfTs_Xqw12gpACU5CltUVOmaPAqtyDZkwJAO-9YFKUDqj1XlWQO6aFtlxVmtvSOaYKLzRfoteHutvQ_xohDqato4OmsR30YzRSKi0VzxPID6ALfYwBKrMNdWvD3lBiJmNmMmYmY2YyZiZjKfViLj-WLfj7zKwoAa9mwEZnmyrYztXxnpOk0DytJVIHblc3sP-f3ub841etipR8OXeA7Q7Ku2h6NkSLtFWxShQ-UHUc4PcdZMNPk8ZXwlx_PjXy28mxvCjWhiT-3cx308_aXR8abwa7b_rwdwj-LzN_AEJYttw</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ</creator><creator>Lecours, Serge</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Institute of Psychoanalysis</general><general>Institute of Psychoanalysis (British)</general><general>Institute of Psycho-analysis</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>Analyzing forms of superego functioning as mentalizations</title><author>Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ ; Lecours, Serge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5009-1e6baa9412c1e2f4de82275eeddd5265bce1add7fe4c2858a37f83abcc279d583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Ego</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hostility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>mental representation</topic><topic>mentalization</topic><topic>mindfulness</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>paul gray</topic><topic>pierre luquet</topic><topic>preconscious</topic><topic>Psychoanalysis</topic><topic>Psychoanalytic cure</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>reflective function</topic><topic>Self Psychology</topic><topic>self-regulation</topic><topic>superego analysis</topic><topic>superego functioning</topic><topic>thinking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecours, Serge</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychoanalysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouchard, Marc-Andrŕ</au><au>Lecours, Serge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing forms of superego functioning as mentalizations</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychoanalysis</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychoanal</addtitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>879</spage><epage>896</epage><pages>879-896</pages><issn>0020-7578</issn><eissn>1745-8315</eissn><coden>IJPSAA</coden><abstract>The concept of mentalization seeks to understand the transformation processes of physical quantity into psychical quality through the emergence, development and organization of mental representations. Often discussed in relation to the functioning of both the id and the ego, it is here proposed that the degree of mentalization also determines the level of functioning and maturity of the hostile, self-punitive superego. Luquet's description of four layers of thought (primary mental representations, metaprimary thinking, metaconscious intuitive thinking, conscious verbal thought) serves as a guide to explore issues of the forms of thinking involved in punitive superego activity. Technical implications are also examined to suggest that three steps can be differentiated in the developing capacity to represent the superego and to become conscious of its workings. The first objective is to help the ego observe its own activity, in the face of a still, unobserved hostile endopsychic agent (Gray, 1994). The second step is to meet the form and intentions of this agent, to facilitate its mental representation and elaboration. Achievement of the final step implies a growing capacity to take some responsibility for this hostile inner agent, once its activity is comparatively more available to self-observation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>15310426</pmid><doi>10.1516/0AYK-3DCT-UQ87-WH4L</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7578
ispartof International journal of psychoanalysis, 2004-08, Vol.85 (4), p.879-896
issn 0020-7578
1745-8315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66786734
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Ego
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hostility
Humans
mental representation
mentalization
mindfulness
Models, Psychological
paul gray
pierre luquet
preconscious
Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalytic cure
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Punishment
reflective function
Self Psychology
self-regulation
superego analysis
superego functioning
thinking
title Analyzing forms of superego functioning as mentalizations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T17%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20forms%20of%20superego%20functioning%20as%20mentalizations&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychoanalysis&rft.au=Bouchard,%20Marc-Andr%C5%95&rft.date=2004-08&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=879&rft.epage=896&rft.pages=879-896&rft.issn=0020-7578&rft.eissn=1745-8315&rft.coden=IJPSAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1516/0AYK-3DCT-UQ87-WH4L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E66786734%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5009-1e6baa9412c1e2f4de82275eeddd5265bce1add7fe4c2858a37f83abcc279d583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66786734&rft_id=info:pmid/15310426&rfr_iscdi=true