The modified CAMDEX informant interview is a valid and reliable tool for use in the diagnosis of dementia in adults with Down's syndrome

• Published in: Journal of intellectual disability research 2004-09, Vol.48 (6), p.611-620
• Main Authors: Ball, S. L., Holland, A. J., Huppert, F. A., Treppner, P., Watson, P., Hon, J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Adults; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis; Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology; Alzheimer's disease; Alzheimers Disease; CAMDEX; Clinical Diagnosis; Cognitive Ability; Cognitive Processes; Dementia; Diagnosis; Down Syndrome; Down Syndrome - diagnosis; Down Syndrome - epidemiology; Down's syndrome; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Identification; informant interview; Informants; Interrater Reliability; Interview, Psychological; Interviews; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Measures (Individuals); Neuropsychological Tests; Observer Variation; Patients; Predictive Validity; Predictive Value of Tests; reliability; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; validity
• ISSN: 0964-2633; 1365-2788
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00630.x

Background  Dementia because of Alzheimer's disease (AD) commonly affects older adults with Down's syndrome (DS). Methods are needed, with established concurrent and predictive validity, to facilitate the diagnostic assessment of dementia, when it is complicated by pre‐existing intellectual disabilities (ID). We report on the reliability and validity of a modified version of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX) informant interview, for use when assessing people with DS suspected as having dementia. Methods  As part of a previous epidemiological study of older people with DS, the CAMDEX informant interview was used to determine the prevalence of dementia. The 74 people with DS included at that time (Time 1) had also completed the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG), the neuropsychological assessment from the CAMDEX schedule. Fifty‐six were assessed again 6 years later (Time 2). Based on the CAMDEX informant interview, nine of the 74 at Time 1, and 11 of the 56 at Time 2, were found to meet clinical criteria for AD. Forty‐one scored above floor on the CAMCOG at Time 1 and were included in the analysis of cognitive decline. Concurrent validity was established by comparing diagnosis at Time 2 with independent evidence of objective decline on cognitive tasks since Time 1. Predictive validity was established by examining how accurately diagnosis at Time 1 predicted both cognitive decline and future diagnosis. Inter‐rater reliability was determined by comparing the level of agreement between two raters. Results  CAMDEX‐based diagnosis of AD was shown to be consistent with objectively observed cognitive decline (good concurrent validity) and to be a good predictor of future diagnosis. Although numbers are small, some support is also provided for the accuracy with which diagnosis predicts cognitive decline. Inter‐rater reliability was good with Kappa > 0.8 for 91% of items and > 0.6 for all items. Conclusions  The use of the modified CAMDEX informant interview enables the structured collection of diagnostic information, so that a valid and a reliable diagnosis of dementia can be made in those with pre‐existing ID, using established diagnostic criteria.