Loading…

Validation study of the TrueAllele automated data review system

The New York State Convicted Offender DNA Databank is the first U.S. lab to complete an internal validation of the TrueAllele expert data review system. TrueAllele is designed to assess short tandem repeat (STR) DNA data based on several key features such as peak height, shape, area, and position re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of forensic sciences 2004-07, Vol.49 (4), p.660-667
Main Authors: Kadash, Kristy, Kozlowski, Brian E, Biega, Lisa A, Duceman, Barry W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5ce6da49e0d0b2d2ace8346fdba079b1867a7b07845f50722512b280e6f236463
cites
container_end_page 667
container_issue 4
container_start_page 660
container_title Journal of forensic sciences
container_volume 49
creator Kadash, Kristy
Kozlowski, Brian E
Biega, Lisa A
Duceman, Barry W
description The New York State Convicted Offender DNA Databank is the first U.S. lab to complete an internal validation of the TrueAllele expert data review system. TrueAllele is designed to assess short tandem repeat (STR) DNA data based on several key features such as peak height, shape, area, and position relative to a standard ladder and use this information to make accurate allele calls. The software then prioritizes the allele calls based on several user-defined rules. As a result, the user need only review low-quality data. The validation of this system consisted of an extensive optimization phase and a large concordance phase. During optimization, the rule settings were tailored to minimize the amount of high-quality data viewed by the user. In the concordance phase, a large dataset was typed in parallel with the ABI software Gene Scan and Genotyper (manual review) and TrueAllele (automated review) for comparison of allele calls and sample state assignment. Only one significant difference was discovered out of 2048 samples in the concordance study. In this case, TrueAllele revealed a spike in the profile that was interpreted as a DNA peak by the analyst in Genotyper. TrueAllele was designed to focus the review on poor data and to eliminate the need for complete reanalysis technical review. This validation project proved TrueAllele to be dependable for use at the NYS Convicted Offender DNA Databank.
doi_str_mv 10.1520/jfs2003336
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66795193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66795193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5ce6da49e0d0b2d2ace8346fdba079b1867a7b07845f50722512b280e6f236463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M1KxDAUBeAgijNWNz6ABBfuqvcmTdKsZBj8gwE3o9uSNrfYoZ2OTarM21tw3Lg6m4_D4TB2iXCLSsDdpg4CQEqpj9gcldJpBsIeszmAECmizWfsLIQNAGjUeMpmqCQaNHbO7t9d23gXm37LQxz9nvc1jx_E18NIi7allrgbY9-5SJ5P0PGBvhr65mEfInXn7KR2baCLQybs7fFhvXxOV69PL8vFKq2EUTFVFWnvMkvgoRReuIpymenalw6MLTHXxpkSTJ6pWoERQqEoRQ6kayF1pmXCbn57d0P_OVKIRdeEitrWbakfQ6G1sQqtnOD1P7jpx2E7bSsEWp3nOF2VsKsDGsuOfLEbms4N--LvF_kDv3picg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219688100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation study of the TrueAllele automated data review system</title><source>ASTM Journals</source><creator>Kadash, Kristy ; Kozlowski, Brian E ; Biega, Lisa A ; Duceman, Barry W</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadash, Kristy ; Kozlowski, Brian E ; Biega, Lisa A ; Duceman, Barry W</creatorcontrib><description>The New York State Convicted Offender DNA Databank is the first U.S. lab to complete an internal validation of the TrueAllele expert data review system. TrueAllele is designed to assess short tandem repeat (STR) DNA data based on several key features such as peak height, shape, area, and position relative to a standard ladder and use this information to make accurate allele calls. The software then prioritizes the allele calls based on several user-defined rules. As a result, the user need only review low-quality data. The validation of this system consisted of an extensive optimization phase and a large concordance phase. During optimization, the rule settings were tailored to minimize the amount of high-quality data viewed by the user. In the concordance phase, a large dataset was typed in parallel with the ABI software Gene Scan and Genotyper (manual review) and TrueAllele (automated review) for comparison of allele calls and sample state assignment. Only one significant difference was discovered out of 2048 samples in the concordance study. In this case, TrueAllele revealed a spike in the profile that was interpreted as a DNA peak by the analyst in Genotyper. TrueAllele was designed to focus the review on poor data and to eliminate the need for complete reanalysis technical review. This validation project proved TrueAllele to be dependable for use at the NYS Convicted Offender DNA Databank.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1520/jfs2003336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15317179</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFSCAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Automation ; Crime ; Databases, Nucleic Acid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Databases, Nucleic Acid - standards ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA Fingerprinting - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; DNA Fingerprinting - standards ; Expert systems ; Forensic sciences ; Humans ; New York ; Software ; State Government ; Tandem Repeat Sequences</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2004-07, Vol.49 (4), p.660-667</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society for Testing and Materials Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5ce6da49e0d0b2d2ace8346fdba079b1867a7b07845f50722512b280e6f236463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15317179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadash, Kristy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlowski, Brian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biega, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duceman, Barry W</creatorcontrib><title>Validation study of the TrueAllele automated data review system</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>The New York State Convicted Offender DNA Databank is the first U.S. lab to complete an internal validation of the TrueAllele expert data review system. TrueAllele is designed to assess short tandem repeat (STR) DNA data based on several key features such as peak height, shape, area, and position relative to a standard ladder and use this information to make accurate allele calls. The software then prioritizes the allele calls based on several user-defined rules. As a result, the user need only review low-quality data. The validation of this system consisted of an extensive optimization phase and a large concordance phase. During optimization, the rule settings were tailored to minimize the amount of high-quality data viewed by the user. In the concordance phase, a large dataset was typed in parallel with the ABI software Gene Scan and Genotyper (manual review) and TrueAllele (automated review) for comparison of allele calls and sample state assignment. Only one significant difference was discovered out of 2048 samples in the concordance study. In this case, TrueAllele revealed a spike in the profile that was interpreted as a DNA peak by the analyst in Genotyper. TrueAllele was designed to focus the review on poor data and to eliminate the need for complete reanalysis technical review. This validation project proved TrueAllele to be dependable for use at the NYS Convicted Offender DNA Databank.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Databases, Nucleic Acid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Databases, Nucleic Acid - standards</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA Fingerprinting - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>DNA Fingerprinting - standards</subject><subject>Expert systems</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>Tandem Repeat Sequences</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0M1KxDAUBeAgijNWNz6ABBfuqvcmTdKsZBj8gwE3o9uSNrfYoZ2OTarM21tw3Lg6m4_D4TB2iXCLSsDdpg4CQEqpj9gcldJpBsIeszmAECmizWfsLIQNAGjUeMpmqCQaNHbO7t9d23gXm37LQxz9nvc1jx_E18NIi7allrgbY9-5SJ5P0PGBvhr65mEfInXn7KR2baCLQybs7fFhvXxOV69PL8vFKq2EUTFVFWnvMkvgoRReuIpymenalw6MLTHXxpkSTJ6pWoERQqEoRQ6kayF1pmXCbn57d0P_OVKIRdeEitrWbakfQ6G1sQqtnOD1P7jpx2E7bSsEWp3nOF2VsKsDGsuOfLEbms4N--LvF_kDv3picg</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Kadash, Kristy</creator><creator>Kozlowski, Brian E</creator><creator>Biega, Lisa A</creator><creator>Duceman, Barry W</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Validation study of the TrueAllele automated data review system</title><author>Kadash, Kristy ; Kozlowski, Brian E ; Biega, Lisa A ; Duceman, Barry W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5ce6da49e0d0b2d2ace8346fdba079b1867a7b07845f50722512b280e6f236463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Databases, Nucleic Acid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Databases, Nucleic Acid - standards</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA Fingerprinting - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>DNA Fingerprinting - standards</topic><topic>Expert systems</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>Tandem Repeat Sequences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadash, Kristy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlowski, Brian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biega, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duceman, Barry W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadash, Kristy</au><au>Kozlowski, Brian E</au><au>Biega, Lisa A</au><au>Duceman, Barry W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation study of the TrueAllele automated data review system</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>660</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>660-667</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><coden>JFSCAS</coden><abstract>The New York State Convicted Offender DNA Databank is the first U.S. lab to complete an internal validation of the TrueAllele expert data review system. TrueAllele is designed to assess short tandem repeat (STR) DNA data based on several key features such as peak height, shape, area, and position relative to a standard ladder and use this information to make accurate allele calls. The software then prioritizes the allele calls based on several user-defined rules. As a result, the user need only review low-quality data. The validation of this system consisted of an extensive optimization phase and a large concordance phase. During optimization, the rule settings were tailored to minimize the amount of high-quality data viewed by the user. In the concordance phase, a large dataset was typed in parallel with the ABI software Gene Scan and Genotyper (manual review) and TrueAllele (automated review) for comparison of allele calls and sample state assignment. Only one significant difference was discovered out of 2048 samples in the concordance study. In this case, TrueAllele revealed a spike in the profile that was interpreted as a DNA peak by the analyst in Genotyper. TrueAllele was designed to focus the review on poor data and to eliminate the need for complete reanalysis technical review. This validation project proved TrueAllele to be dependable for use at the NYS Convicted Offender DNA Databank.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>15317179</pmid><doi>10.1520/jfs2003336</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1198
ispartof Journal of forensic sciences, 2004-07, Vol.49 (4), p.660-667
issn 0022-1198
1556-4029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66795193
source ASTM Journals
subjects Alleles
Automation
Crime
Databases, Nucleic Acid - legislation & jurisprudence
Databases, Nucleic Acid - standards
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA Fingerprinting - legislation & jurisprudence
DNA Fingerprinting - standards
Expert systems
Forensic sciences
Humans
New York
Software
State Government
Tandem Repeat Sequences
title Validation study of the TrueAllele automated data review system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A06%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20study%20of%20the%20TrueAllele%20automated%20data%20review%20system&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Kadash,%20Kristy&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=660&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=660-667&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft.coden=JFSCAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1520/jfs2003336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E66795193%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5ce6da49e0d0b2d2ace8346fdba079b1867a7b07845f50722512b280e6f236463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219688100&rft_id=info:pmid/15317179&rfr_iscdi=true