Loading…

Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system

Summary Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of laboratory hematology 2009-02, Vol.31 (1), p.48-60
Main Authors: BRIGGS, C., LONGAIR, I., SLAVIK, M., THWAITE, K., MILLS, R., THAVARAJA, V., FOSTER, A., ROMANIN, D., MACHIN, S. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 48
container_title International journal of laboratory hematology
container_volume 31
creator BRIGGS, C.
LONGAIR, I.
SLAVIK, M.
THWAITE, K.
MILLS, R.
THAVARAJA, V.
FOSTER, A.
ROMANIN, D.
MACHIN, S. J.
description Summary Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow and had difficulty in classifying abnormal cells. More recently the CellaVision™ DM96 (CellaVision AB, Lund, Sweden) has been introduced with added features such as continuous loading of slides and a faster throughput than previous instruments. The accuracy of CellaVisionTM DM96 has been evaluated by comparing results to reference manual differentials. Results from different operators using the DM96 were compared with their own manual differential and to a 400‐cell reference manual differential. Precision of the instrument was compared to the manual differential. The preclassification accuracy of the DM96 was 89.2%. Precision was similar to that of the 100‐cell manual differential. The DM96 was faster than the manual method, even after reclassification by a laboratory scientist of any cells wrongly categorized by the instrument. The DM96 accuracy in morphological classification of leucocytes and red blood cells; depends upon both blood pathology and experience of the laboratory scientist using the instrument. For some cell types and operators, DM96 accuracy was better than the individual’s 100 cell manual differential.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01002.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66815634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66815634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFS2zAQhjVMO0CBV2B06s1GsiTLvtChoRCYlF5oYbho1s6KKpXt1LLb5A362LVJJvRYXbSz-vfb1b-EUM5iPpyzRcy14pFS4jFOGNMx44wl8WqPHO4e3uzihB-QdyEsGFNasnyfHPCMay1Fdkj-TKCm0HdNBR3OaeGbZk6t8xWFGvw6uEBbXHookXbfkVZQ9-Dp3FmLLdadA_-BXtQUf4HvoXNNTRv7opyg9_DNhTF1-TlP_2niKnjGV35Yhw6rY_LWgg94sr2PyNerT_eTaTT7cn0zuZhFpWRpEiWQC2XznNkMLc80FoVWViQKCgm2KDPLLUM1fFxjImQiEaQoWSk1MkwFF0fk_Ya7bJufPYbOVC6U47A1Nn0waZpxlQo5CLONsGybEFq0ZtkOk7drw5kZt2AWZjTYjGabcQvmZQtmNZSebnv0RYXz18Kt7YPgfCP47Tyu_xtsbm5n0zEcANEG4AbvVjsAtD9MqoVW5uHu2nx8uru9nD1NDRd_AdgRp60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66815634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>BRIGGS, C. ; LONGAIR, I. ; SLAVIK, M. ; THWAITE, K. ; MILLS, R. ; THAVARAJA, V. ; FOSTER, A. ; ROMANIN, D. ; MACHIN, S. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>BRIGGS, C. ; LONGAIR, I. ; SLAVIK, M. ; THWAITE, K. ; MILLS, R. ; THAVARAJA, V. ; FOSTER, A. ; ROMANIN, D. ; MACHIN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow and had difficulty in classifying abnormal cells. More recently the CellaVision™ DM96 (CellaVision AB, Lund, Sweden) has been introduced with added features such as continuous loading of slides and a faster throughput than previous instruments. The accuracy of CellaVisionTM DM96 has been evaluated by comparing results to reference manual differentials. Results from different operators using the DM96 were compared with their own manual differential and to a 400‐cell reference manual differential. Precision of the instrument was compared to the manual differential. The preclassification accuracy of the DM96 was 89.2%. Precision was similar to that of the 100‐cell manual differential. The DM96 was faster than the manual method, even after reclassification by a laboratory scientist of any cells wrongly categorized by the instrument. The DM96 accuracy in morphological classification of leucocytes and red blood cells; depends upon both blood pathology and experience of the laboratory scientist using the instrument. For some cell types and operators, DM96 accuracy was better than the individual’s 100 cell manual differential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-5521</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-553X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01002.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18177438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>automated image analysis ; Automation ; Blood Specimen Collection - instrumentation ; Blood Specimen Collection - methods ; Hematologic Tests - instrumentation ; Hematologic Tests - methods ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards ; Leucocyte differential ; Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation ; Medical Laboratory Science - methods ; microscopy ; Observer Variation ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>International journal of laboratory hematology, 2009-02, Vol.31 (1), p.48-60</ispartof><rights>2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18177438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRIGGS, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONGAIR, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLAVIK, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THWAITE, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILLS, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THAVARAJA, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOSTER, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROMANIN, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACHIN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system</title><title>International journal of laboratory hematology</title><addtitle>Int J Lab Hematol</addtitle><description>Summary Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow and had difficulty in classifying abnormal cells. More recently the CellaVision™ DM96 (CellaVision AB, Lund, Sweden) has been introduced with added features such as continuous loading of slides and a faster throughput than previous instruments. The accuracy of CellaVisionTM DM96 has been evaluated by comparing results to reference manual differentials. Results from different operators using the DM96 were compared with their own manual differential and to a 400‐cell reference manual differential. Precision of the instrument was compared to the manual differential. The preclassification accuracy of the DM96 was 89.2%. Precision was similar to that of the 100‐cell manual differential. The DM96 was faster than the manual method, even after reclassification by a laboratory scientist of any cells wrongly categorized by the instrument. The DM96 accuracy in morphological classification of leucocytes and red blood cells; depends upon both blood pathology and experience of the laboratory scientist using the instrument. For some cell types and operators, DM96 accuracy was better than the individual’s 100 cell manual differential.</description><subject>automated image analysis</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - methods</subject><subject>Hematologic Tests - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hematologic Tests - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><subject>Leucocyte differential</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Science - methods</subject><subject>microscopy</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1751-5521</issn><issn>1751-553X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFS2zAQhjVMO0CBV2B06s1GsiTLvtChoRCYlF5oYbho1s6KKpXt1LLb5A362LVJJvRYXbSz-vfb1b-EUM5iPpyzRcy14pFS4jFOGNMx44wl8WqPHO4e3uzihB-QdyEsGFNasnyfHPCMay1Fdkj-TKCm0HdNBR3OaeGbZk6t8xWFGvw6uEBbXHookXbfkVZQ9-Dp3FmLLdadA_-BXtQUf4HvoXNNTRv7opyg9_DNhTF1-TlP_2niKnjGV35Yhw6rY_LWgg94sr2PyNerT_eTaTT7cn0zuZhFpWRpEiWQC2XznNkMLc80FoVWViQKCgm2KDPLLUM1fFxjImQiEaQoWSk1MkwFF0fk_Ya7bJufPYbOVC6U47A1Nn0waZpxlQo5CLONsGybEFq0ZtkOk7drw5kZt2AWZjTYjGabcQvmZQtmNZSebnv0RYXz18Kt7YPgfCP47Tyu_xtsbm5n0zEcANEG4AbvVjsAtD9MqoVW5uHu2nx8uru9nD1NDRd_AdgRp60</recordid><startdate>200902</startdate><enddate>200902</enddate><creator>BRIGGS, C.</creator><creator>LONGAIR, I.</creator><creator>SLAVIK, M.</creator><creator>THWAITE, K.</creator><creator>MILLS, R.</creator><creator>THAVARAJA, V.</creator><creator>FOSTER, A.</creator><creator>ROMANIN, D.</creator><creator>MACHIN, S. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200902</creationdate><title>Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system</title><author>BRIGGS, C. ; LONGAIR, I. ; SLAVIK, M. ; THWAITE, K. ; MILLS, R. ; THAVARAJA, V. ; FOSTER, A. ; ROMANIN, D. ; MACHIN, S. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>automated image analysis</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - methods</topic><topic>Hematologic Tests - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hematologic Tests - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><topic>Leucocyte differential</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Science - methods</topic><topic>microscopy</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRIGGS, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONGAIR, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLAVIK, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THWAITE, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILLS, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THAVARAJA, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOSTER, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROMANIN, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACHIN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of laboratory hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRIGGS, C.</au><au>LONGAIR, I.</au><au>SLAVIK, M.</au><au>THWAITE, K.</au><au>MILLS, R.</au><au>THAVARAJA, V.</au><au>FOSTER, A.</au><au>ROMANIN, D.</au><au>MACHIN, S. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system</atitle><jtitle>International journal of laboratory hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Lab Hematol</addtitle><date>2009-02</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>48-60</pages><issn>1751-5521</issn><eissn>1751-553X</eissn><abstract>Summary Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow and had difficulty in classifying abnormal cells. More recently the CellaVision™ DM96 (CellaVision AB, Lund, Sweden) has been introduced with added features such as continuous loading of slides and a faster throughput than previous instruments. The accuracy of CellaVisionTM DM96 has been evaluated by comparing results to reference manual differentials. Results from different operators using the DM96 were compared with their own manual differential and to a 400‐cell reference manual differential. Precision of the instrument was compared to the manual differential. The preclassification accuracy of the DM96 was 89.2%. Precision was similar to that of the 100‐cell manual differential. The DM96 was faster than the manual method, even after reclassification by a laboratory scientist of any cells wrongly categorized by the instrument. The DM96 accuracy in morphological classification of leucocytes and red blood cells; depends upon both blood pathology and experience of the laboratory scientist using the instrument. For some cell types and operators, DM96 accuracy was better than the individual’s 100 cell manual differential.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18177438</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01002.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-5521
ispartof International journal of laboratory hematology, 2009-02, Vol.31 (1), p.48-60
issn 1751-5521
1751-553X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66815634
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects automated image analysis
Automation
Blood Specimen Collection - instrumentation
Blood Specimen Collection - methods
Hematologic Tests - instrumentation
Hematologic Tests - methods
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards
Leucocyte differential
Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation
Medical Laboratory Science - methods
microscopy
Observer Variation
Reproducibility of Results
title Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A40%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20automated%20blood%20film%20analysis%20replace%20the%20manual%20differential?%20An%20evaluation%20of%20the%20CellaVision%20DM96%20automated%20image%20analysis%20system&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20laboratory%20hematology&rft.au=BRIGGS,%20C.&rft.date=2009-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=48-60&rft.issn=1751-5521&rft.eissn=1751-553X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01002.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66815634%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66815634&rft_id=info:pmid/18177438&rfr_iscdi=true