Loading…
Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system
Summary Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow a...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of laboratory hematology 2009-02, Vol.31 (1), p.48-60 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313 |
container_end_page | 60 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | International journal of laboratory hematology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | BRIGGS, C. LONGAIR, I. SLAVIK, M. THWAITE, K. MILLS, R. THAVARAJA, V. FOSTER, A. ROMANIN, D. MACHIN, S. J. |
description | Summary
Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow and had difficulty in classifying abnormal cells. More recently the CellaVision™ DM96 (CellaVision AB, Lund, Sweden) has been introduced with added features such as continuous loading of slides and a faster throughput than previous instruments. The accuracy of CellaVisionTM DM96 has been evaluated by comparing results to reference manual differentials. Results from different operators using the DM96 were compared with their own manual differential and to a 400‐cell reference manual differential. Precision of the instrument was compared to the manual differential. The preclassification accuracy of the DM96 was 89.2%. Precision was similar to that of the 100‐cell manual differential. The DM96 was faster than the manual method, even after reclassification by a laboratory scientist of any cells wrongly categorized by the instrument. The DM96 accuracy in morphological classification of leucocytes and red blood cells; depends upon both blood pathology and experience of the laboratory scientist using the instrument. For some cell types and operators, DM96 accuracy was better than the individual’s 100 cell manual differential. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01002.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66815634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66815634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFS2zAQhjVMO0CBV2B06s1GsiTLvtChoRCYlF5oYbho1s6KKpXt1LLb5A362LVJJvRYXbSz-vfb1b-EUM5iPpyzRcy14pFS4jFOGNMx44wl8WqPHO4e3uzihB-QdyEsGFNasnyfHPCMay1Fdkj-TKCm0HdNBR3OaeGbZk6t8xWFGvw6uEBbXHookXbfkVZQ9-Dp3FmLLdadA_-BXtQUf4HvoXNNTRv7opyg9_DNhTF1-TlP_2niKnjGV35Yhw6rY_LWgg94sr2PyNerT_eTaTT7cn0zuZhFpWRpEiWQC2XznNkMLc80FoVWViQKCgm2KDPLLUM1fFxjImQiEaQoWSk1MkwFF0fk_Ya7bJufPYbOVC6U47A1Nn0waZpxlQo5CLONsGybEFq0ZtkOk7drw5kZt2AWZjTYjGabcQvmZQtmNZSebnv0RYXz18Kt7YPgfCP47Tyu_xtsbm5n0zEcANEG4AbvVjsAtD9MqoVW5uHu2nx8uru9nD1NDRd_AdgRp60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66815634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>BRIGGS, C. ; LONGAIR, I. ; SLAVIK, M. ; THWAITE, K. ; MILLS, R. ; THAVARAJA, V. ; FOSTER, A. ; ROMANIN, D. ; MACHIN, S. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>BRIGGS, C. ; LONGAIR, I. ; SLAVIK, M. ; THWAITE, K. ; MILLS, R. ; THAVARAJA, V. ; FOSTER, A. ; ROMANIN, D. ; MACHIN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow and had difficulty in classifying abnormal cells. More recently the CellaVision™ DM96 (CellaVision AB, Lund, Sweden) has been introduced with added features such as continuous loading of slides and a faster throughput than previous instruments. The accuracy of CellaVisionTM DM96 has been evaluated by comparing results to reference manual differentials. Results from different operators using the DM96 were compared with their own manual differential and to a 400‐cell reference manual differential. Precision of the instrument was compared to the manual differential. The preclassification accuracy of the DM96 was 89.2%. Precision was similar to that of the 100‐cell manual differential. The DM96 was faster than the manual method, even after reclassification by a laboratory scientist of any cells wrongly categorized by the instrument. The DM96 accuracy in morphological classification of leucocytes and red blood cells; depends upon both blood pathology and experience of the laboratory scientist using the instrument. For some cell types and operators, DM96 accuracy was better than the individual’s 100 cell manual differential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-5521</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-553X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01002.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18177438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>automated image analysis ; Automation ; Blood Specimen Collection - instrumentation ; Blood Specimen Collection - methods ; Hematologic Tests - instrumentation ; Hematologic Tests - methods ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards ; Leucocyte differential ; Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation ; Medical Laboratory Science - methods ; microscopy ; Observer Variation ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>International journal of laboratory hematology, 2009-02, Vol.31 (1), p.48-60</ispartof><rights>2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18177438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRIGGS, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONGAIR, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLAVIK, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THWAITE, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILLS, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THAVARAJA, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOSTER, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROMANIN, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACHIN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system</title><title>International journal of laboratory hematology</title><addtitle>Int J Lab Hematol</addtitle><description>Summary
Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow and had difficulty in classifying abnormal cells. More recently the CellaVision™ DM96 (CellaVision AB, Lund, Sweden) has been introduced with added features such as continuous loading of slides and a faster throughput than previous instruments. The accuracy of CellaVisionTM DM96 has been evaluated by comparing results to reference manual differentials. Results from different operators using the DM96 were compared with their own manual differential and to a 400‐cell reference manual differential. Precision of the instrument was compared to the manual differential. The preclassification accuracy of the DM96 was 89.2%. Precision was similar to that of the 100‐cell manual differential. The DM96 was faster than the manual method, even after reclassification by a laboratory scientist of any cells wrongly categorized by the instrument. The DM96 accuracy in morphological classification of leucocytes and red blood cells; depends upon both blood pathology and experience of the laboratory scientist using the instrument. For some cell types and operators, DM96 accuracy was better than the individual’s 100 cell manual differential.</description><subject>automated image analysis</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - methods</subject><subject>Hematologic Tests - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hematologic Tests - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><subject>Leucocyte differential</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Science - methods</subject><subject>microscopy</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1751-5521</issn><issn>1751-553X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFS2zAQhjVMO0CBV2B06s1GsiTLvtChoRCYlF5oYbho1s6KKpXt1LLb5A362LVJJvRYXbSz-vfb1b-EUM5iPpyzRcy14pFS4jFOGNMx44wl8WqPHO4e3uzihB-QdyEsGFNasnyfHPCMay1Fdkj-TKCm0HdNBR3OaeGbZk6t8xWFGvw6uEBbXHookXbfkVZQ9-Dp3FmLLdadA_-BXtQUf4HvoXNNTRv7opyg9_DNhTF1-TlP_2niKnjGV35Yhw6rY_LWgg94sr2PyNerT_eTaTT7cn0zuZhFpWRpEiWQC2XznNkMLc80FoVWViQKCgm2KDPLLUM1fFxjImQiEaQoWSk1MkwFF0fk_Ya7bJufPYbOVC6U47A1Nn0waZpxlQo5CLONsGybEFq0ZtkOk7drw5kZt2AWZjTYjGabcQvmZQtmNZSebnv0RYXz18Kt7YPgfCP47Tyu_xtsbm5n0zEcANEG4AbvVjsAtD9MqoVW5uHu2nx8uru9nD1NDRd_AdgRp60</recordid><startdate>200902</startdate><enddate>200902</enddate><creator>BRIGGS, C.</creator><creator>LONGAIR, I.</creator><creator>SLAVIK, M.</creator><creator>THWAITE, K.</creator><creator>MILLS, R.</creator><creator>THAVARAJA, V.</creator><creator>FOSTER, A.</creator><creator>ROMANIN, D.</creator><creator>MACHIN, S. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200902</creationdate><title>Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system</title><author>BRIGGS, C. ; LONGAIR, I. ; SLAVIK, M. ; THWAITE, K. ; MILLS, R. ; THAVARAJA, V. ; FOSTER, A. ; ROMANIN, D. ; MACHIN, S. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>automated image analysis</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - methods</topic><topic>Hematologic Tests - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hematologic Tests - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><topic>Leucocyte differential</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Science - methods</topic><topic>microscopy</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRIGGS, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONGAIR, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLAVIK, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THWAITE, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILLS, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THAVARAJA, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOSTER, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROMANIN, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACHIN, S. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of laboratory hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRIGGS, C.</au><au>LONGAIR, I.</au><au>SLAVIK, M.</au><au>THWAITE, K.</au><au>MILLS, R.</au><au>THAVARAJA, V.</au><au>FOSTER, A.</au><au>ROMANIN, D.</au><au>MACHIN, S. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system</atitle><jtitle>International journal of laboratory hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Lab Hematol</addtitle><date>2009-02</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>48-60</pages><issn>1751-5521</issn><eissn>1751-553X</eissn><abstract>Summary
Automation of differentials is desirable for economic and time‐saving reasons. Over the last 20 years, automated imaging processes have started to be introduced where stained blood films are scanned by a computer‐driven microscope and leucocytes classified; however, early methods were slow and had difficulty in classifying abnormal cells. More recently the CellaVision™ DM96 (CellaVision AB, Lund, Sweden) has been introduced with added features such as continuous loading of slides and a faster throughput than previous instruments. The accuracy of CellaVisionTM DM96 has been evaluated by comparing results to reference manual differentials. Results from different operators using the DM96 were compared with their own manual differential and to a 400‐cell reference manual differential. Precision of the instrument was compared to the manual differential. The preclassification accuracy of the DM96 was 89.2%. Precision was similar to that of the 100‐cell manual differential. The DM96 was faster than the manual method, even after reclassification by a laboratory scientist of any cells wrongly categorized by the instrument. The DM96 accuracy in morphological classification of leucocytes and red blood cells; depends upon both blood pathology and experience of the laboratory scientist using the instrument. For some cell types and operators, DM96 accuracy was better than the individual’s 100 cell manual differential.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18177438</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01002.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1751-5521 |
ispartof | International journal of laboratory hematology, 2009-02, Vol.31 (1), p.48-60 |
issn | 1751-5521 1751-553X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66815634 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | automated image analysis Automation Blood Specimen Collection - instrumentation Blood Specimen Collection - methods Hematologic Tests - instrumentation Hematologic Tests - methods Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards Leucocyte differential Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation Medical Laboratory Science - methods microscopy Observer Variation Reproducibility of Results |
title | Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A40%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20automated%20blood%20film%20analysis%20replace%20the%20manual%20differential?%20An%20evaluation%20of%20the%20CellaVision%20DM96%20automated%20image%20analysis%20system&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20laboratory%20hematology&rft.au=BRIGGS,%20C.&rft.date=2009-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=48-60&rft.issn=1751-5521&rft.eissn=1751-553X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01002.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66815634%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4062-2a935f990f8ef187ebb75f325ab4afbc8f1f0e57517e23424ea43c0c47e0e6313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66815634&rft_id=info:pmid/18177438&rfr_iscdi=true |