Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data

Geneticists have been interested in inbreeding and inbreeding depression since the time of Darwin. Two alternative approaches that can be used to measure how inbred an individual is involve the use of pedigree records to estimate inbreeding coefficients or molecular markers to measure multilocus het...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heredity 2004-09, Vol.93 (3), p.255-265
Main Authors: Slate, J, David, P, Dodds, K.G, Veenvliet, B.A, Glass, B.C, Broad, T.E, McEwan, J.C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cytogenetics
Ecology
Evolutionary Biology
Genotypes
Heterozygote
Human Genetics
Inbreeding
Microsatellite Repeats - genetics
Models, Genetic
original-article
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Sheep, Domestic - genetics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Geneticists have been interested in inbreeding and inbreeding depression since the time of Darwin. Two alternative approaches that can be used to measure how inbred an individual is involve the use of pedigree records to estimate inbreeding coefficients or molecular markers to measure multilocus heterozygosity. However, the relationship between inbreeding coefficient and heterozygosity has only rarely been investigated. In this paper, a framework to predict the relationship between the two variables is presented. In addition, microsatellite genotypes at 138 loci spanning all 26 autosomes of the sheep genome were used to investigate the relationship between inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity. Multilocus heterozygosity was only weakly correlated with inbreeding coefficient, and heterozygosity was not positively correlated between markers more often than expected by chance. Inbreeding coefficient, but not multilocus heterozygosity, detected evidence of inbreeding depression for morphological traits. The relevance of these findings to the causes of heterozygosity–fitness correlations is discussed and predictions for other wild and captive populations are presented.
ISSN:0018-067X
1365-2540
DOI:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800485