Loading…

Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens

Production performance and egg quality were compared between 4 strains of beak-trimmed layers: 3 commercial strains--Lohmann White (LW), H&N White (HN), Lohmann Brown (LB)--and a noncommercial cross between Rhode Island Red (male) and Barred Plymouth Rock (female) in conventional cages and in fl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Poultry science 2009-02, Vol.88 (2), p.256-264
Main Authors: Singh, R, Cheng, K.M, Silversides, F.G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-aea4b4aaced24b324f3612f5e08cb69abd68fe1b38490362e1362b7bc335dd3b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-aea4b4aaced24b324f3612f5e08cb69abd68fe1b38490362e1362b7bc335dd3b3
container_end_page 264
container_issue 2
container_start_page 256
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 88
creator Singh, R
Cheng, K.M
Silversides, F.G
description Production performance and egg quality were compared between 4 strains of beak-trimmed layers: 3 commercial strains--Lohmann White (LW), H&N White (HN), Lohmann Brown (LB)--and a noncommercial cross between Rhode Island Red (male) and Barred Plymouth Rock (female) in conventional cages and in floor pens. All chicks were reared and 857 pullets were housed at 18 wk of age in their respective environments. Body weight, hen-day egg production, feed consumption and efficiency, and egg quality were measured at wk 20, 30, 40, and 50. In floor pens, the location of eggs was recorded for 4 consecutive days at 4-wk intervals between 20 and 50 wk of age. Eggs from cages, nest-boxes, and the floor were tested for Escherichia coli and coliform contamination at 38 and 42 wk of age. Mortality was recorded during the rearing and laying periods. Housing systems significantly influenced BW and mortality but not feed consumption or feed efficiency. The interaction between environment and strain was significant for hen-day egg production at wk 20 to 30 and for BW at wk 30, 40, and 50. Hens in floor pens had greater BW, egg and yolk weights, and yolk color than those in cages. Commercial hens produced more eggs than the cross hens. Overall, HN hens had the best production performance, whereas cross hens had better egg quality. In floor pens, LW and HN hens laid most of their eggs in nest boxes, whereas LB and cross hens laid half of their eggs on the floor. Eggs from cages had lower E. coli and coliform contamination than those from nest-boxes and the floor, and E. coli contamination was greater for LB eggs than for LW eggs. Significant strain differences were found for the use of nest-boxes, with a high percentage of floor eggs for brown egg strains. This study suggests that genotype x environment interactions should be considered when alternative housing systems are proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.3382/ps.2008-00237
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66828630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66828630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-aea4b4aaced24b324f3612f5e08cb69abd68fe1b38490362e1362b7bc335dd3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1L7DAUQIMoOn4s3WpW7qr5aNPMUuQ9FQQFdR1u0pva9zpJTVph_r0dZ8DNvVw49ywOIeecXUupxc2QrwVjumBMyHqPLHglqkLymu-TBWNSFFW95EfkOOd_M8KVqg_JEV_yis_vCxJfUmwmN3Yx0AGTj2kFwSGF0FBsW_o5Qd-Naxo99XFKNI8JupA3dw_rLrT0A-fzPw4j7QJ1MXxh2Nigpw5azD8m38eYZn_Ip-TAQ5_xbLdPyPvfP293D8XT8_3j3e1T4UrBxgIQSlsCOGxEaaUovVRc-AqZdlYtwTZKe-RW6nLJpBLI52Fr66SsmkZaeUKutt4hxc8J82hWXXbY9xAwTtkopYVWks1gsQVdijkn9GZI3QrS2nBmNoXNkM2msPkpPPMXO_FkV9j80rukM3C5BTxEA23qsnl_FYxLxivNtSjlN1zJgcs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66828630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Singh, R ; Cheng, K.M ; Silversides, F.G</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, R ; Cheng, K.M ; Silversides, F.G</creatorcontrib><description>Production performance and egg quality were compared between 4 strains of beak-trimmed layers: 3 commercial strains--Lohmann White (LW), H&amp;N White (HN), Lohmann Brown (LB)--and a noncommercial cross between Rhode Island Red (male) and Barred Plymouth Rock (female) in conventional cages and in floor pens. All chicks were reared and 857 pullets were housed at 18 wk of age in their respective environments. Body weight, hen-day egg production, feed consumption and efficiency, and egg quality were measured at wk 20, 30, 40, and 50. In floor pens, the location of eggs was recorded for 4 consecutive days at 4-wk intervals between 20 and 50 wk of age. Eggs from cages, nest-boxes, and the floor were tested for Escherichia coli and coliform contamination at 38 and 42 wk of age. Mortality was recorded during the rearing and laying periods. Housing systems significantly influenced BW and mortality but not feed consumption or feed efficiency. The interaction between environment and strain was significant for hen-day egg production at wk 20 to 30 and for BW at wk 30, 40, and 50. Hens in floor pens had greater BW, egg and yolk weights, and yolk color than those in cages. Commercial hens produced more eggs than the cross hens. Overall, HN hens had the best production performance, whereas cross hens had better egg quality. In floor pens, LW and HN hens laid most of their eggs in nest boxes, whereas LB and cross hens laid half of their eggs on the floor. Eggs from cages had lower E. coli and coliform contamination than those from nest-boxes and the floor, and E. coli contamination was greater for LB eggs than for LW eggs. Significant strain differences were found for the use of nest-boxes, with a high percentage of floor eggs for brown egg strains. This study suggests that genotype x environment interactions should be considered when alternative housing systems are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19151338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Poultry Science Association</publisher><subject>animal age ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animal Husbandry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Animals ; bacterial contamination ; battery cages ; Body Weight ; chicken breeds ; Chickens - classification ; Chickens - metabolism ; Chickens - physiology ; coliform bacteria ; Eating ; egg production ; egg quality ; egg yolk ; egg yolk color ; Eggs - standards ; Escherichia coli ; feed conversion ; feed intake ; Female ; floor pens ; food contamination ; genotype ; genotype-environment interaction ; Housing, Animal - standards ; laying hens ; nest boxes ; Oviposition - physiology ; poultry housing ; Species Specificity ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2009-02, Vol.88 (2), p.256-264</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-aea4b4aaced24b324f3612f5e08cb69abd68fe1b38490362e1362b7bc335dd3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-aea4b4aaced24b324f3612f5e08cb69abd68fe1b38490362e1362b7bc335dd3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19151338$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silversides, F.G</creatorcontrib><title>Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>Production performance and egg quality were compared between 4 strains of beak-trimmed layers: 3 commercial strains--Lohmann White (LW), H&amp;N White (HN), Lohmann Brown (LB)--and a noncommercial cross between Rhode Island Red (male) and Barred Plymouth Rock (female) in conventional cages and in floor pens. All chicks were reared and 857 pullets were housed at 18 wk of age in their respective environments. Body weight, hen-day egg production, feed consumption and efficiency, and egg quality were measured at wk 20, 30, 40, and 50. In floor pens, the location of eggs was recorded for 4 consecutive days at 4-wk intervals between 20 and 50 wk of age. Eggs from cages, nest-boxes, and the floor were tested for Escherichia coli and coliform contamination at 38 and 42 wk of age. Mortality was recorded during the rearing and laying periods. Housing systems significantly influenced BW and mortality but not feed consumption or feed efficiency. The interaction between environment and strain was significant for hen-day egg production at wk 20 to 30 and for BW at wk 30, 40, and 50. Hens in floor pens had greater BW, egg and yolk weights, and yolk color than those in cages. Commercial hens produced more eggs than the cross hens. Overall, HN hens had the best production performance, whereas cross hens had better egg quality. In floor pens, LW and HN hens laid most of their eggs in nest boxes, whereas LB and cross hens laid half of their eggs on the floor. Eggs from cages had lower E. coli and coliform contamination than those from nest-boxes and the floor, and E. coli contamination was greater for LB eggs than for LW eggs. Significant strain differences were found for the use of nest-boxes, with a high percentage of floor eggs for brown egg strains. This study suggests that genotype x environment interactions should be considered when alternative housing systems are proposed.</description><subject>animal age</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bacterial contamination</subject><subject>battery cages</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>chicken breeds</subject><subject>Chickens - classification</subject><subject>Chickens - metabolism</subject><subject>Chickens - physiology</subject><subject>coliform bacteria</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>egg production</subject><subject>egg quality</subject><subject>egg yolk</subject><subject>egg yolk color</subject><subject>Eggs - standards</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>feed conversion</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>floor pens</subject><subject>food contamination</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>genotype-environment interaction</subject><subject>Housing, Animal - standards</subject><subject>laying hens</subject><subject>nest boxes</subject><subject>Oviposition - physiology</subject><subject>poultry housing</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1L7DAUQIMoOn4s3WpW7qr5aNPMUuQ9FQQFdR1u0pva9zpJTVph_r0dZ8DNvVw49ywOIeecXUupxc2QrwVjumBMyHqPLHglqkLymu-TBWNSFFW95EfkOOd_M8KVqg_JEV_yis_vCxJfUmwmN3Yx0AGTj2kFwSGF0FBsW_o5Qd-Naxo99XFKNI8JupA3dw_rLrT0A-fzPw4j7QJ1MXxh2Nigpw5azD8m38eYZn_Ip-TAQ5_xbLdPyPvfP293D8XT8_3j3e1T4UrBxgIQSlsCOGxEaaUovVRc-AqZdlYtwTZKe-RW6nLJpBLI52Fr66SsmkZaeUKutt4hxc8J82hWXXbY9xAwTtkopYVWks1gsQVdijkn9GZI3QrS2nBmNoXNkM2msPkpPPMXO_FkV9j80rukM3C5BTxEA23qsnl_FYxLxivNtSjlN1zJgcs</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Singh, R</creator><creator>Cheng, K.M</creator><creator>Silversides, F.G</creator><general>Poultry Science Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens</title><author>Singh, R ; Cheng, K.M ; Silversides, F.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-aea4b4aaced24b324f3612f5e08cb69abd68fe1b38490362e1362b7bc335dd3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>animal age</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bacterial contamination</topic><topic>battery cages</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>chicken breeds</topic><topic>Chickens - classification</topic><topic>Chickens - metabolism</topic><topic>Chickens - physiology</topic><topic>coliform bacteria</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>egg production</topic><topic>egg quality</topic><topic>egg yolk</topic><topic>egg yolk color</topic><topic>Eggs - standards</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>feed conversion</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>floor pens</topic><topic>food contamination</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>genotype-environment interaction</topic><topic>Housing, Animal - standards</topic><topic>laying hens</topic><topic>nest boxes</topic><topic>Oviposition - physiology</topic><topic>poultry housing</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silversides, F.G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, R</au><au>Cheng, K.M</au><au>Silversides, F.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>256-264</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>Production performance and egg quality were compared between 4 strains of beak-trimmed layers: 3 commercial strains--Lohmann White (LW), H&amp;N White (HN), Lohmann Brown (LB)--and a noncommercial cross between Rhode Island Red (male) and Barred Plymouth Rock (female) in conventional cages and in floor pens. All chicks were reared and 857 pullets were housed at 18 wk of age in their respective environments. Body weight, hen-day egg production, feed consumption and efficiency, and egg quality were measured at wk 20, 30, 40, and 50. In floor pens, the location of eggs was recorded for 4 consecutive days at 4-wk intervals between 20 and 50 wk of age. Eggs from cages, nest-boxes, and the floor were tested for Escherichia coli and coliform contamination at 38 and 42 wk of age. Mortality was recorded during the rearing and laying periods. Housing systems significantly influenced BW and mortality but not feed consumption or feed efficiency. The interaction between environment and strain was significant for hen-day egg production at wk 20 to 30 and for BW at wk 30, 40, and 50. Hens in floor pens had greater BW, egg and yolk weights, and yolk color than those in cages. Commercial hens produced more eggs than the cross hens. Overall, HN hens had the best production performance, whereas cross hens had better egg quality. In floor pens, LW and HN hens laid most of their eggs in nest boxes, whereas LB and cross hens laid half of their eggs on the floor. Eggs from cages had lower E. coli and coliform contamination than those from nest-boxes and the floor, and E. coli contamination was greater for LB eggs than for LW eggs. Significant strain differences were found for the use of nest-boxes, with a high percentage of floor eggs for brown egg strains. This study suggests that genotype x environment interactions should be considered when alternative housing systems are proposed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Poultry Science Association</pub><pmid>19151338</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps.2008-00237</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2009-02, Vol.88 (2), p.256-264
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66828630
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects animal age
Animal Husbandry - methods
Animal Husbandry - statistics & numerical data
Animals
bacterial contamination
battery cages
Body Weight
chicken breeds
Chickens - classification
Chickens - metabolism
Chickens - physiology
coliform bacteria
Eating
egg production
egg quality
egg yolk
egg yolk color
Eggs - standards
Escherichia coli
feed conversion
feed intake
Female
floor pens
food contamination
genotype
genotype-environment interaction
Housing, Animal - standards
laying hens
nest boxes
Oviposition - physiology
poultry housing
Species Specificity
Time Factors
title Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A59%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Production%20performance%20and%20egg%20quality%20of%20four%20strains%20of%20laying%20hens%20kept%20in%20conventional%20cages%20and%20floor%20pens&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Singh,%20R&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=256-264&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps.2008-00237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66828630%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-aea4b4aaced24b324f3612f5e08cb69abd68fe1b38490362e1362b7bc335dd3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66828630&rft_id=info:pmid/19151338&rfr_iscdi=true