Loading…
An assessment of the validity of tympanometry compared to myringotomy performed under a nitrous oxide-free general anaesthetic
To assess the validity of tympanometry as a test for the presence of middle ear effusion using a ‘gold-standard’ of myringotomy performed after a nitrous oxide-free general anaesthetic, we performed a prospective validity study comparing tympanometry traces obtained immediately pre-operatively from...
Saved in:
Published in: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2009-03, Vol.266 (3), p.373-376 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To assess the validity of tympanometry as a test for the presence of middle ear effusion using a ‘gold-standard’ of myringotomy performed after a nitrous oxide-free general anaesthetic, we performed a prospective validity study comparing tympanometry traces obtained immediately pre-operatively from patients undergoing grommet insertion, with the otomicroscopic findings at myringotomy. Nitrous oxide was omitted from the anaesthetic gaseous mixture as it has been reported to displace middle ear effusions. One hundred and seventy-two patients (aged 1.5–15 years) with a clinically assessed 3 month history of middle ear effusion were included in the study. Sensitivity and specificity of a Jerger classification Type B tympanometric trace for the presence of middle ear effusion were 0.73 and 0.84, respectively. We conclude that tympanometry is a valid test in assessing the presence of middle ear effusion compared to a ‘gold standard’ of myringotomy performed after a nitrous oxide-free general anaesthetic. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0937-4477 1434-4726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00405-008-0765-y |