First-trimester contingent screening for Down syndrome can reduce the number of nuchal translucency measurements required

• Published in: Prenatal diagnosis 2009-01, Vol.29 (1), p.79-82
• Main Authors: Vadiveloo, Thenmalar, Crossley, Jennifer A., Aitken, David A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Biomarkers - blood; Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - blood; Cohort Studies; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation; Down syndrome; Down Syndrome - blood; Down Syndrome - diagnostic imaging; False Positive Reactions; Female; first trimester; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Maternal Age; Medical sciences; Molecular and cellular biology; nuchal translucency; Nuchal Translucency Measurement; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A - analysis; prenatal screening; Sensitivity and Specificity; serum markers
• ISSN: 0197-3851; 1097-0223
• DOI: 10.1002/pd.2185

Background To assess the performance of a two‐stage screening protocol for Down syndrome based on initial serum marker analysis for all women and nuchal translucency (NT) measurement only in women with intermediate risks. Methods Biochemical marker and NT data in 10 189 women who had had combined ultrasound and biochemical (CUB) screening, were re‐analysed using the contingent model. A risk was calculated from the results of the pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A (PAPP‐A) and free β human chorionic gonadotrophin (FβhCG) measurements and maternal age. For risks between 1 in 42 and 1 in 1000, the likelihood ratio from the NT measurement was incorporated and assessed against a final cut‐off risk of 1 in 250. Results A total of 3.1% unaffected and 61.4% Down syndrome pregnancies had risks ≥ 1: 42. In women with risks < 1 in 42 and > 1 in 1000 (29%), a further 2.7% unaffected pregnancies and 27.3% Down syndrome pregnancies had risks above 1 in 250 when NT was incorporated. Overall detection rate was 88.6%, and false positive rate 5.8% (compared with 90.9% and 6.4% for CUB screening). NT measurements were required in 29% of women. Conclusions Within first‐trimester, contingent screening provides good sensitivity and specificity with the potential for considerable saving in ultrasound resources. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.