Loading…
Preliminary observations on the use of propionyl-L-carnitine in combination with sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction and diabetes
SUMMARY Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of oral propionyl-L-carnitine (PLC) plus sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and diabetes unresponsive to sildenafil monotherapy. Materials and methods: Patients with medically documented ED of organic or mixed aetiology and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current medical research and opinion 2004-09, Vol.20 (9), p.1377-1384 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | SUMMARY
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of oral propionyl-L-carnitine (PLC) plus sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and diabetes unresponsive to sildenafil monotherapy.
Materials and methods: Patients with medically documented ED of organic or mixed aetiology and diabetes (type 1 and 2) were randomised to receive oral PLC (2 g/day) plus sildenafil (50 mg twice weekly) (20 patients, Group 1) or sildenafil alone (20 patients, Group 2), in a double-blind, fixed-dose study. All patients had been previously treated unsuccessfully with a minimum of eight administrations of sildenafil. Efficacy was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire: total score, subscores for questions 3 (Q3; achieving an erection) and 4 (Q4; maintaining an erection) and global efficacy question (GEQ: 'Has treatment improved your erections?'). Patients Event Logs were also used.
Results: After 24 weeks of treatment, mean scores for IIEF Q3 and Q4 had improved significantly in patients of Group 1 (4.25 ± 0.63 and 3.95 ± 1.0) compared with Group 2 (2.9 ± 0.71 and 2.7 ± 0.96) ( p < 0.01). Moreover, the percentage of patients with improved erections (GEQ 68% vs. 23%) and successful intercourse attempts (76% vs. 34%) was significantly increased in Group 1 compared with Group 2 ( p < 0.01). Fourteen (70%) patients in Group 1 and four (20%) in Group 2 reported an increase in mean IIEF EF domain score of ≥ 4 ( p < 0.01). Treatments were well tolerated and no patient discontinued study medication. Two patients in Group 1 reported mild gastric pain.
Conclusions: Salvage therapy with PLC plus sildenafil was more effective than sildenafil in the treatment of ED in patients with diabetes refractory to sildenafil monotherapy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-7995 1473-4877 |
DOI: | 10.1185/030079904X2394 |