Loading…

Multicenter Study of a Rapid Molecular-Based Assay for the Diagnosis of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women

Background. Current prevention of infection due to group B Streptococcus (GBS) involves giving intrapartum antibiotics to women on the basis of either antenatal culture colonization status or presence of risk factors. Methods. We prospectively compared the performance characteristics of a rapid mole...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical infectious diseases 2004-10, Vol.39 (8), p.1129-1135
Main Authors: Davies, H. Dele, Miller, Mark A., Faro, Sebastian, Gregson, Dan, Kehl, Sue C., Jordan, Jeanne A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-d0b53fdba4aea090053dc0e41aeb48a271bc8aa92cde94eeef76db4b1128bc793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-d0b53fdba4aea090053dc0e41aeb48a271bc8aa92cde94eeef76db4b1128bc793
container_end_page 1135
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1129
container_title Clinical infectious diseases
container_volume 39
creator Davies, H. Dele
Miller, Mark A.
Faro, Sebastian
Gregson, Dan
Kehl, Sue C.
Jordan, Jeanne A.
description Background. Current prevention of infection due to group B Streptococcus (GBS) involves giving intrapartum antibiotics to women on the basis of either antenatal culture colonization status or presence of risk factors. Methods. We prospectively compared the performance characteristics of a rapid molecular diagnostic test (IDI-Strep B; Infectio Diagnostic) with culture for intrapartum GBS detection after 36 weeks' gestation in 5 North American centers during the period September 2001–May 2002. Antenatal GBS screening was done according to the usual practice of participating hospitals. Two combined vaginal/anal specimens were obtained from participants during labor by use of standard techniques and processed by the same laboratories that processed the antenatal specimens. Each swab sample was processed simultaneously by culture and with IDI-Strep B. The collected specimens were randomized for order of testing of the swab samples by culture or the rapid test. Results. Of enrolled women, 803 (91.1%) were eligible for analysis. The overall intrapartum GBS colonization rate by culture was 18.6% (range, 9.1%–28.7%). Compared with intrapartum culture, the molecular test had a sensitivity of 94.0% (range, 90.1%–97.8%), specificity of 95.9% (range, 94.3%–97.4%), positive predictive value of 83.8% (range, 78.2%–89.4%), and negative predictive value of 98.6% (range, 97.7%–99.5%). The molecular test was superior to antenatal cultures (sensitivity, 94% vs. 54%; P < .0001) and prediction of intrapartum status on the basis of risk factors (sensitivity, 94% vs. 42%; P < .0001). Conclusion. Use of this test for determination of GBS colonization during labor is highly sensitive and specific and may lead to a further reduction in rates of neonatal GBS disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/424518
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66974625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4462875</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1086/424518</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4462875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-d0b53fdba4aea090053dc0e41aeb48a271bc8aa92cde94eeef76db4b1128bc793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoqXAL0DIvfQWsOPPHNultEi7BVEQiIs1cSbFJRsvtiOxiB9PVlm1J8RpRppnHo3mLYrnjL5i1KjXohKSmQfFIZNcl0rW7OHUU2lKYbg5KJ6kdEspY4bKx8UBk8Iow-Vh8Wc19tk7HDJGcp3HdktCR4B8hI1vySr06MYeYnkGCVtymhJsSRciyd-RvPFwM4Tk027lIoZxQ84mR8RNDi44NyayCH0Y_G_IPgzED-RDxJsBhky-hDUOT4tHHfQJn-3rUfH57fmnxWW5fH_xbnG6LJ2oeC5b2kjetQ0IQKA1pZK3jqJggI0wUGnWOANQV67FWiBip1XbiIaxyjRO1_yoOJm9mxh-jpiyXfvksO9hwDAmq1Stharkf0GmdS0UN_egiyGliJ3dRL-GuLWM2l0gdg5kAl_ujWOzxvYe2ycwAcczML3v35IXM3Obcoh3lJhuNnqnKOexTxl_3Y0h_rBKcy3t5ddvdkW5uqquru2S_wULN6l6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17794638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter Study of a Rapid Molecular-Based Assay for the Diagnosis of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Davies, H. Dele ; Miller, Mark A. ; Faro, Sebastian ; Gregson, Dan ; Kehl, Sue C. ; Jordan, Jeanne A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davies, H. Dele ; Miller, Mark A. ; Faro, Sebastian ; Gregson, Dan ; Kehl, Sue C. ; Jordan, Jeanne A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Current prevention of infection due to group B Streptococcus (GBS) involves giving intrapartum antibiotics to women on the basis of either antenatal culture colonization status or presence of risk factors. Methods. We prospectively compared the performance characteristics of a rapid molecular diagnostic test (IDI-Strep B; Infectio Diagnostic) with culture for intrapartum GBS detection after 36 weeks' gestation in 5 North American centers during the period September 2001–May 2002. Antenatal GBS screening was done according to the usual practice of participating hospitals. Two combined vaginal/anal specimens were obtained from participants during labor by use of standard techniques and processed by the same laboratories that processed the antenatal specimens. Each swab sample was processed simultaneously by culture and with IDI-Strep B. The collected specimens were randomized for order of testing of the swab samples by culture or the rapid test. Results. Of enrolled women, 803 (91.1%) were eligible for analysis. The overall intrapartum GBS colonization rate by culture was 18.6% (range, 9.1%–28.7%). Compared with intrapartum culture, the molecular test had a sensitivity of 94.0% (range, 90.1%–97.8%), specificity of 95.9% (range, 94.3%–97.4%), positive predictive value of 83.8% (range, 78.2%–89.4%), and negative predictive value of 98.6% (range, 97.7%–99.5%). The molecular test was superior to antenatal cultures (sensitivity, 94% vs. 54%; P &lt; .0001) and prediction of intrapartum status on the basis of risk factors (sensitivity, 94% vs. 42%; P &lt; .0001). Conclusion. Use of this test for determination of GBS colonization during labor is highly sensitive and specific and may lead to a further reduction in rates of neonatal GBS disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/424518</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15486835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques - methods ; Blood ; Carrier State - diagnosis ; Carrier State - microbiology ; Childbirth ; Cultural values ; Culture Techniques ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Major Articles ; Neonatal diseases ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Predisposing factors ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - microbiology ; Preventive medicine ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specimens ; Streptococcus ; Streptococcus agalactiae ; Streptococcus agalactiae - classification ; Streptococcus agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2004-10, Vol.39 (8), p.1129-1135</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><rights>2004 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-d0b53fdba4aea090053dc0e41aeb48a271bc8aa92cde94eeef76db4b1128bc793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-d0b53fdba4aea090053dc0e41aeb48a271bc8aa92cde94eeef76db4b1128bc793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4462875$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4462875$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15486835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davies, H. Dele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faro, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregson, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehl, Sue C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Jeanne A.</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter Study of a Rapid Molecular-Based Assay for the Diagnosis of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>Background. Current prevention of infection due to group B Streptococcus (GBS) involves giving intrapartum antibiotics to women on the basis of either antenatal culture colonization status or presence of risk factors. Methods. We prospectively compared the performance characteristics of a rapid molecular diagnostic test (IDI-Strep B; Infectio Diagnostic) with culture for intrapartum GBS detection after 36 weeks' gestation in 5 North American centers during the period September 2001–May 2002. Antenatal GBS screening was done according to the usual practice of participating hospitals. Two combined vaginal/anal specimens were obtained from participants during labor by use of standard techniques and processed by the same laboratories that processed the antenatal specimens. Each swab sample was processed simultaneously by culture and with IDI-Strep B. The collected specimens were randomized for order of testing of the swab samples by culture or the rapid test. Results. Of enrolled women, 803 (91.1%) were eligible for analysis. The overall intrapartum GBS colonization rate by culture was 18.6% (range, 9.1%–28.7%). Compared with intrapartum culture, the molecular test had a sensitivity of 94.0% (range, 90.1%–97.8%), specificity of 95.9% (range, 94.3%–97.4%), positive predictive value of 83.8% (range, 78.2%–89.4%), and negative predictive value of 98.6% (range, 97.7%–99.5%). The molecular test was superior to antenatal cultures (sensitivity, 94% vs. 54%; P &lt; .0001) and prediction of intrapartum status on the basis of risk factors (sensitivity, 94% vs. 42%; P &lt; .0001). Conclusion. Use of this test for determination of GBS colonization during labor is highly sensitive and specific and may lead to a further reduction in rates of neonatal GBS disease.</description><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Carrier State - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carrier State - microbiology</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>Culture Techniques</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Major Articles</subject><subject>Neonatal diseases</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Predisposing factors</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - microbiology</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specimens</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><subject>Streptococcus agalactiae</subject><subject>Streptococcus agalactiae - classification</subject><subject>Streptococcus agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoqXAL0DIvfQWsOPPHNultEi7BVEQiIs1cSbFJRsvtiOxiB9PVlm1J8RpRppnHo3mLYrnjL5i1KjXohKSmQfFIZNcl0rW7OHUU2lKYbg5KJ6kdEspY4bKx8UBk8Iow-Vh8Wc19tk7HDJGcp3HdktCR4B8hI1vySr06MYeYnkGCVtymhJsSRciyd-RvPFwM4Tk027lIoZxQ84mR8RNDi44NyayCH0Y_G_IPgzED-RDxJsBhky-hDUOT4tHHfQJn-3rUfH57fmnxWW5fH_xbnG6LJ2oeC5b2kjetQ0IQKA1pZK3jqJggI0wUGnWOANQV67FWiBip1XbiIaxyjRO1_yoOJm9mxh-jpiyXfvksO9hwDAmq1Stharkf0GmdS0UN_egiyGliJ3dRL-GuLWM2l0gdg5kAl_ujWOzxvYe2ycwAcczML3v35IXM3Obcoh3lJhuNnqnKOexTxl_3Y0h_rBKcy3t5ddvdkW5uqquru2S_wULN6l6</recordid><startdate>20041015</startdate><enddate>20041015</enddate><creator>Davies, H. Dele</creator><creator>Miller, Mark A.</creator><creator>Faro, Sebastian</creator><creator>Gregson, Dan</creator><creator>Kehl, Sue C.</creator><creator>Jordan, Jeanne A.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041015</creationdate><title>Multicenter Study of a Rapid Molecular-Based Assay for the Diagnosis of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women</title><author>Davies, H. Dele ; Miller, Mark A. ; Faro, Sebastian ; Gregson, Dan ; Kehl, Sue C. ; Jordan, Jeanne A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-d0b53fdba4aea090053dc0e41aeb48a271bc8aa92cde94eeef76db4b1128bc793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Typing Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Carrier State - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carrier State - microbiology</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>Culture Techniques</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Major Articles</topic><topic>Neonatal diseases</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Predisposing factors</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - microbiology</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specimens</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><topic>Streptococcus agalactiae</topic><topic>Streptococcus agalactiae - classification</topic><topic>Streptococcus agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davies, H. Dele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faro, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregson, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehl, Sue C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Jeanne A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davies, H. Dele</au><au>Miller, Mark A.</au><au>Faro, Sebastian</au><au>Gregson, Dan</au><au>Kehl, Sue C.</au><au>Jordan, Jeanne A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter Study of a Rapid Molecular-Based Assay for the Diagnosis of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</stitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2004-10-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1135</epage><pages>1129-1135</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Background. Current prevention of infection due to group B Streptococcus (GBS) involves giving intrapartum antibiotics to women on the basis of either antenatal culture colonization status or presence of risk factors. Methods. We prospectively compared the performance characteristics of a rapid molecular diagnostic test (IDI-Strep B; Infectio Diagnostic) with culture for intrapartum GBS detection after 36 weeks' gestation in 5 North American centers during the period September 2001–May 2002. Antenatal GBS screening was done according to the usual practice of participating hospitals. Two combined vaginal/anal specimens were obtained from participants during labor by use of standard techniques and processed by the same laboratories that processed the antenatal specimens. Each swab sample was processed simultaneously by culture and with IDI-Strep B. The collected specimens were randomized for order of testing of the swab samples by culture or the rapid test. Results. Of enrolled women, 803 (91.1%) were eligible for analysis. The overall intrapartum GBS colonization rate by culture was 18.6% (range, 9.1%–28.7%). Compared with intrapartum culture, the molecular test had a sensitivity of 94.0% (range, 90.1%–97.8%), specificity of 95.9% (range, 94.3%–97.4%), positive predictive value of 83.8% (range, 78.2%–89.4%), and negative predictive value of 98.6% (range, 97.7%–99.5%). The molecular test was superior to antenatal cultures (sensitivity, 94% vs. 54%; P &lt; .0001) and prediction of intrapartum status on the basis of risk factors (sensitivity, 94% vs. 42%; P &lt; .0001). Conclusion. Use of this test for determination of GBS colonization during labor is highly sensitive and specific and may lead to a further reduction in rates of neonatal GBS disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>15486835</pmid><doi>10.1086/424518</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-4838
ispartof Clinical infectious diseases, 2004-10, Vol.39 (8), p.1129-1135
issn 1058-4838
1537-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66974625
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online
subjects Bacterial Typing Techniques - methods
Blood
Carrier State - diagnosis
Carrier State - microbiology
Childbirth
Cultural values
Culture Techniques
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Infectious diseases
Major Articles
Neonatal diseases
Polymerase chain reaction
Predictive Value of Tests
Predisposing factors
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - microbiology
Preventive medicine
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specimens
Streptococcus
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus agalactiae - classification
Streptococcus agalactiae - isolation & purification
Time Factors
title Multicenter Study of a Rapid Molecular-Based Assay for the Diagnosis of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A14%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20Study%20of%20a%20Rapid%20Molecular-Based%20Assay%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Group%20B%20Streptococcus%20Colonization%20in%20Pregnant%20Women&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Davies,%20H.%20Dele&rft.date=2004-10-15&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1135&rft.pages=1129-1135&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/424518&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4462875%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-d0b53fdba4aea090053dc0e41aeb48a271bc8aa92cde94eeef76db4b1128bc793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17794638&rft_id=info:pmid/15486835&rft_jstor_id=4462875&rft_oup_id=10.1086/424518&rfr_iscdi=true