Loading…
Mental motor imagery and the body schema: evidence for proprioceptive dominance
Previous studies have demonstrated that both visual and proprioceptive feedback influence motor control. The relative contributions of these sensory modalities to the on-line computation of body position—that is, the body schema—remain unclear. We report a study designed to explore the roles of visi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuroscience letters 2004-11, Vol.370 (1), p.19-24 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Previous studies have demonstrated that both visual and proprioceptive feedback influence motor control. The relative contributions of these sensory modalities to the on-line computation of body position—that is, the body schema—remain unclear. We report a study designed to explore the roles of vision and proprioception in motor planning. The task required subjects to judge if a pictured stimulus was a right or left hand; stimuli included pictures of a right or left hand in a palm up or palm down position and in six different angular rotations (0°, 60°, 120°, 180°, 240°, 300°). Each subject was tested with his/her right hand palm down and palm up. There were three conditions: a “control” condition (real hand in view), a “fake hand” condition (fake hand in view, real hand out of view), and a “proprioception” condition (no fake hand, real hand out of view). We found that proprioceptive input (that is, the subject's “felt position”) had a significant influence on mental rotation whereas the visually perceived posture of the hand did not. We suggest that, at least under some circumstances, proprioceptive inflow may represent the dominant sensory input to the on-line representation of the body in space. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3940 1872-7972 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.053 |