Loading…

Surgical Factors Influence the Outcome After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Consecutive Series of 240 Patients at an Experienced Center

Background Despite a considerable number of randomized studies, the surgical approach to locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) I and II is still discussed controversially. Thus, we evaluated the surgical risk and outcome after an abdominothoracic esophagectomy (Ivor-L...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of surgical oncology 2009-04, Vol.16 (4), p.1017-1025
Main Authors: Ott, Katja, Bader, Franz G., Lordick, Florian, Feith, Marcus, Bartels, Holger, Siewert, J. Ruediger
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3d35e1705c53801b8d16de2a0f21499eb58edd5d45175adc9d051ce7f45d5e7b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3d35e1705c53801b8d16de2a0f21499eb58edd5d45175adc9d051ce7f45d5e7b3
container_end_page 1025
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1017
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 16
creator Ott, Katja
Bader, Franz G.
Lordick, Florian
Feith, Marcus
Bartels, Holger
Siewert, J. Ruediger
description Background Despite a considerable number of randomized studies, the surgical approach to locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) I and II is still discussed controversially. Thus, we evaluated the surgical risk and outcome after an abdominothoracic esophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis) with intrathoracic anastomosis as standard procedure. Methods Between 1998 and 2006, a total of 240 consecutive patients underwent standardized right thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis operation) for AEG I ( n  = 206) or AEG II ( n  = 34). A total of 157 patients (65.4%) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17.9% (43 of 240). Overall mortality was 3.8% (9 of 240). The majority of patients (4 of 9) died because of severe pulmonary complications (44.4%) irrespective of surgical complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase morbidity or mortality. The median overall survival was 51 months. Multivariate analysis including age >75 years, clinical response to chemotherapy, complications, R-category and N-category revealed R-category ( P  = .005; relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.14–0.70) and complications ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-009-0336-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67001705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1657273461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3d35e1705c53801b8d16de2a0f21499eb58edd5d45175adc9d051ce7f45d5e7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1q3DAQhU1paP76AL0pQy9y51ayLP_0ziybdMtCAkmvhVYa7yrY0laSk-ZF-zyVuwuBQkEgMfOdM4NOln2g5DMtSv4lUFKyMiekzQljVc7fZGeUp0pZNfRtepOqydui4qfZeQiPhNCaEf4uO6UtbdKpzrLf95PfGiUHuJYqOh9gZfthQqsQ4g7hdorKjQhdH9HD6sn5fI3PJsAyuP1ObjGJxhd4NnGXlNHLuHNeKqOgszKkngsJ7p2HTqN1SnplrBsluP6v_9HGbRPsk-r7ZFU0zn6FDhbOBlRTNE8I9-gNhllVlATuZDRoYwAZQVpY_trP7bSzhkWqo7_MTno5BHx_vC-yH9fLh8W3fH17s1p061yxqo0504wjrQlXnDWEbhpNK42FJH1By7bFDW9Qa65LTmsutWo14VRh3Zdcc6w37CK7Ovjuvfs5YYhiNEHhMEiLbgqiqudPJzyBn_4BH93kbdpNFEXNStJQkiB6gJR3IXjsxd6bUfoXQYmYExeHxEVKXMyJi9n449F42oyoXxXHiBNQHICQWnaL_nXy_13_ABHzulc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227340810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical Factors Influence the Outcome After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Consecutive Series of 240 Patients at an Experienced Center</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Ott, Katja ; Bader, Franz G. ; Lordick, Florian ; Feith, Marcus ; Bartels, Holger ; Siewert, J. Ruediger</creator><creatorcontrib>Ott, Katja ; Bader, Franz G. ; Lordick, Florian ; Feith, Marcus ; Bartels, Holger ; Siewert, J. Ruediger</creatorcontrib><description>Background Despite a considerable number of randomized studies, the surgical approach to locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) I and II is still discussed controversially. Thus, we evaluated the surgical risk and outcome after an abdominothoracic esophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis) with intrathoracic anastomosis as standard procedure. Methods Between 1998 and 2006, a total of 240 consecutive patients underwent standardized right thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis operation) for AEG I ( n  = 206) or AEG II ( n  = 34). A total of 157 patients (65.4%) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17.9% (43 of 240). Overall mortality was 3.8% (9 of 240). The majority of patients (4 of 9) died because of severe pulmonary complications (44.4%) irrespective of surgical complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase morbidity or mortality. The median overall survival was 51 months. Multivariate analysis including age &gt;75 years, clinical response to chemotherapy, complications, R-category and N-category revealed R-category ( P  = .005; relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.14–0.70) and complications ( P  &lt; .001, RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08–0.35) as independent prognostic factors for all patients. Complications was the only independent prognostic factor ( P  &lt; .001, RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.08–0.35) for the R0 resected patients. Conclusions At an experienced center, Ivor-Lewis resection is a safe surgical procedure. Outcome of patients was significantly influenced by surgical factors such as complete resection and complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not lead to higher morbidity and mortality. The high mortality from non-surgery–related complications emphasizes the importance of careful preoperative evaluation of comorbidities and patient selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0336-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19189186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy - adverse effects ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Esophagectomy - mortality ; Esophagogastric Junction - surgery ; Esophagus - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Original Article-Thoracic Oncology ; Stomach - surgery ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Thoracic Cavity ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2009-04, Vol.16 (4), p.1017-1025</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3d35e1705c53801b8d16de2a0f21499eb58edd5d45175adc9d051ce7f45d5e7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3d35e1705c53801b8d16de2a0f21499eb58edd5d45175adc9d051ce7f45d5e7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ott, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bader, Franz G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lordick, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feith, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siewert, J. Ruediger</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical Factors Influence the Outcome After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Consecutive Series of 240 Patients at an Experienced Center</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Despite a considerable number of randomized studies, the surgical approach to locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) I and II is still discussed controversially. Thus, we evaluated the surgical risk and outcome after an abdominothoracic esophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis) with intrathoracic anastomosis as standard procedure. Methods Between 1998 and 2006, a total of 240 consecutive patients underwent standardized right thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis operation) for AEG I ( n  = 206) or AEG II ( n  = 34). A total of 157 patients (65.4%) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17.9% (43 of 240). Overall mortality was 3.8% (9 of 240). The majority of patients (4 of 9) died because of severe pulmonary complications (44.4%) irrespective of surgical complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase morbidity or mortality. The median overall survival was 51 months. Multivariate analysis including age &gt;75 years, clinical response to chemotherapy, complications, R-category and N-category revealed R-category ( P  = .005; relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.14–0.70) and complications ( P  &lt; .001, RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08–0.35) as independent prognostic factors for all patients. Complications was the only independent prognostic factor ( P  &lt; .001, RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.08–0.35) for the R0 resected patients. Conclusions At an experienced center, Ivor-Lewis resection is a safe surgical procedure. Outcome of patients was significantly influenced by surgical factors such as complete resection and complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not lead to higher morbidity and mortality. The high mortality from non-surgery–related complications emphasizes the importance of careful preoperative evaluation of comorbidities and patient selection.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Esophagogastric Junction - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagus - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article-Thoracic Oncology</subject><subject>Stomach - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Thoracic Cavity</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd1q3DAQhU1paP76AL0pQy9y51ayLP_0ziybdMtCAkmvhVYa7yrY0laSk-ZF-zyVuwuBQkEgMfOdM4NOln2g5DMtSv4lUFKyMiekzQljVc7fZGeUp0pZNfRtepOqydui4qfZeQiPhNCaEf4uO6UtbdKpzrLf95PfGiUHuJYqOh9gZfthQqsQ4g7hdorKjQhdH9HD6sn5fI3PJsAyuP1ObjGJxhd4NnGXlNHLuHNeKqOgszKkngsJ7p2HTqN1SnplrBsluP6v_9HGbRPsk-r7ZFU0zn6FDhbOBlRTNE8I9-gNhllVlATuZDRoYwAZQVpY_trP7bSzhkWqo7_MTno5BHx_vC-yH9fLh8W3fH17s1p061yxqo0504wjrQlXnDWEbhpNK42FJH1By7bFDW9Qa65LTmsutWo14VRh3Zdcc6w37CK7Ovjuvfs5YYhiNEHhMEiLbgqiqudPJzyBn_4BH93kbdpNFEXNStJQkiB6gJR3IXjsxd6bUfoXQYmYExeHxEVKXMyJi9n449F42oyoXxXHiBNQHICQWnaL_nXy_13_ABHzulc</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Ott, Katja</creator><creator>Bader, Franz G.</creator><creator>Lordick, Florian</creator><creator>Feith, Marcus</creator><creator>Bartels, Holger</creator><creator>Siewert, J. Ruediger</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Surgical Factors Influence the Outcome After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Consecutive Series of 240 Patients at an Experienced Center</title><author>Ott, Katja ; Bader, Franz G. ; Lordick, Florian ; Feith, Marcus ; Bartels, Holger ; Siewert, J. Ruediger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3d35e1705c53801b8d16de2a0f21499eb58edd5d45175adc9d051ce7f45d5e7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Esophagogastric Junction - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagus - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article-Thoracic Oncology</topic><topic>Stomach - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Thoracic Cavity</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ott, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bader, Franz G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lordick, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feith, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siewert, J. Ruediger</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ott, Katja</au><au>Bader, Franz G.</au><au>Lordick, Florian</au><au>Feith, Marcus</au><au>Bartels, Holger</au><au>Siewert, J. Ruediger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical Factors Influence the Outcome After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Consecutive Series of 240 Patients at an Experienced Center</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1017</spage><epage>1025</epage><pages>1017-1025</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background Despite a considerable number of randomized studies, the surgical approach to locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) I and II is still discussed controversially. Thus, we evaluated the surgical risk and outcome after an abdominothoracic esophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis) with intrathoracic anastomosis as standard procedure. Methods Between 1998 and 2006, a total of 240 consecutive patients underwent standardized right thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis operation) for AEG I ( n  = 206) or AEG II ( n  = 34). A total of 157 patients (65.4%) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17.9% (43 of 240). Overall mortality was 3.8% (9 of 240). The majority of patients (4 of 9) died because of severe pulmonary complications (44.4%) irrespective of surgical complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase morbidity or mortality. The median overall survival was 51 months. Multivariate analysis including age &gt;75 years, clinical response to chemotherapy, complications, R-category and N-category revealed R-category ( P  = .005; relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.14–0.70) and complications ( P  &lt; .001, RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08–0.35) as independent prognostic factors for all patients. Complications was the only independent prognostic factor ( P  &lt; .001, RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.08–0.35) for the R0 resected patients. Conclusions At an experienced center, Ivor-Lewis resection is a safe surgical procedure. Outcome of patients was significantly influenced by surgical factors such as complete resection and complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not lead to higher morbidity and mortality. The high mortality from non-surgery–related complications emphasizes the importance of careful preoperative evaluation of comorbidities and patient selection.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19189186</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-009-0336-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2009-04, Vol.16 (4), p.1017-1025
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67001705
source Springer Link
subjects Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anastomosis, Surgical
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - adverse effects
Esophagectomy - methods
Esophagectomy - mortality
Esophagogastric Junction - surgery
Esophagus - surgery
Female
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Oncology
Original Article-Thoracic Oncology
Stomach - surgery
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Thoracic Cavity
Treatment Outcome
title Surgical Factors Influence the Outcome After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Consecutive Series of 240 Patients at an Experienced Center
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A05%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20Factors%20Influence%20the%20Outcome%20After%20Ivor-Lewis%20Esophagectomy%20with%20Intrathoracic%20Anastomosis%20for%20Adenocarcinoma%20of%20the%20Esophagogastric%20Junction:%20A%20Consecutive%20Series%20of%20240%20Patients%20at%20an%20Experienced%20Center&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Ott,%20Katja&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1017&rft.epage=1025&rft.pages=1017-1025&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-009-0336-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1657273461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3d35e1705c53801b8d16de2a0f21499eb58edd5d45175adc9d051ce7f45d5e7b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227340810&rft_id=info:pmid/19189186&rfr_iscdi=true