Loading…
Agreement and disagreement between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear imaging for assessment of myocardial viability
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced MRI and nuclear imaging with 99m Tc-tetrofosmin and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for assessment of myocardial viability. Methods Included in the study were 60 patients with se...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2009-04, Vol.36 (4), p.594-601 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced MRI and nuclear imaging with
99m
Tc-tetrofosmin and
18
F-fluorodeoxyglucose (
18
F-FDG) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for assessment of myocardial viability.
Methods
Included in the study were 60 patients with severe ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI,
99m
Tc-tetrofosmin and
18
F-FDG SPECT. Myocardial segments were assigned a wall motion score from 0 (normokinesia) to 4 (dyskinesia) and a scar score from 0 (no scar) to 4 (76–100% transmural extent). Furthermore,
99m
Tc-tetrofosmin and
18
F-FDG segmental tracer uptake was categorized from 0 (tracer activity >75%) to 3 (tracer activity |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-008-1001-0 |