Loading…
The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders
This study describes the conceptual foundation and psychometric properties of the Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS), a patient-reported health status assessment designed to quantify the physical, cognitive, and psychological burden of stroke. Qualitative research methods were used to develop a 112-item...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2004-10, Vol.57 (10), p.997-1007 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ed70c49f25dc5f61954e7870d64642652c1895203b0f0ee613028a55a55023293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ed70c49f25dc5f61954e7870d64642652c1895203b0f0ee613028a55a55023293 |
container_end_page | 1007 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 997 |
container_title | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Doyle, Patrick J. McNeil, Malcolm R. Mikolic, Joseph M. Prieto, Luis Hula, William D. Lustig, Amy P. Ross, Katherine Wambaugh, Julie L. Gonzalez-Rothi, Leslie J. Elman, Roberta J. |
description | This study describes the conceptual foundation and psychometric properties of the Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS), a patient-reported health status assessment designed to quantify the physical, cognitive, and psychological burden of stroke.
Qualitative research methods were used to develop a 112-item pilot version of the instrument. The pilot version was administered to healthy controls (
n
=
251) and stroke survivors with (
n
=
135) and without (
n
=
146) communication disorders on a single occasion for the purposes of reducing the global item pool, describing the resulting scale properties, examining the dimensionality of the burden of stroke construct, and examining the known-groups validity of the instrument.
Sixty-four items were retained, comprising 12 internally consistent and unidimensional scales. Principal components analysis revealed three second-order factors (Physical Activity Limitations, Cognitive Activity Limitations, and Psychological Distress) comprising the Burden of Stroke construct. Comparisons between groups revealed that stroke survivors reported greater activity limitations and psychological distress on all scales relative to controls, and that stroke survivors with communication disorders reported greater activity limitations on swallowing, communication, cognition, and social relations scales relative to non–communicatively disordered stroke survivors.
These findings support the internal consistency of the BOSS scales, the hypothesized dimensionality of the burden of stroke construct, and the known-groups validity of the instrument. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.016 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67046949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895435604000599</els_id><sourcerecordid>2734327501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ed70c49f25dc5f61954e7870d64642652c1895203b0f0ee613028a55a55023293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdtu1DAQhiMEotvCK1SWEKhcJNhO7CR3pRUnqVIvtlxbXntCHbL2YiepeCMekwlZVIkbJEu2R9_8c_iz7JzRglEm3_VFbwbn4eAKTmlZMFZg-Em2YU3d5KLl7Gm2oU0r8qoU8iQ7TamnlNW0Fs-zEyYEb6igm-zX3T2Qqyla8CR0ZDvG8B3I1ugByMXV7Xb7lhximJ2FRGY9OEu0tyTC4PQOkWRCBAJpdHs9IoIS3eTN6IJ3_tsf9gGGId_B8nWepLVAmuLs5hATeXDj_crhI0wjMWG_n7wzehEh1qWAzcX0InvW6SHBy-N9ln39-OHu-nN-c_vpy_X7m9xUnI852Jqaqu24sEZ0krWigrqpqZWVrLgU3DBcCqfljnYUQLKS8kYLgYfykrflWfZm1cWxf0w4mdq7ZHAG7SFMScmaVrKtFvDVP2AfpuixN8VoWbKaSdYgJVfKxJBShE4dIu4q_kRILU6qXv11Ui1OKsYUhjHx_Cg_7fZgH9OO1iHw-gjohHZ1UXvj0iMneV2ztkLucuUAtzY7iCoZB96AdRHMqGxw_-vlN_ltwLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033171618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Doyle, Patrick J. ; McNeil, Malcolm R. ; Mikolic, Joseph M. ; Prieto, Luis ; Hula, William D. ; Lustig, Amy P. ; Ross, Katherine ; Wambaugh, Julie L. ; Gonzalez-Rothi, Leslie J. ; Elman, Roberta J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Patrick J. ; McNeil, Malcolm R. ; Mikolic, Joseph M. ; Prieto, Luis ; Hula, William D. ; Lustig, Amy P. ; Ross, Katherine ; Wambaugh, Julie L. ; Gonzalez-Rothi, Leslie J. ; Elman, Roberta J.</creatorcontrib><description>This study describes the conceptual foundation and psychometric properties of the Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS), a patient-reported health status assessment designed to quantify the physical, cognitive, and psychological burden of stroke.
Qualitative research methods were used to develop a 112-item pilot version of the instrument. The pilot version was administered to healthy controls (
n
=
251) and stroke survivors with (
n
=
135) and without (
n
=
146) communication disorders on a single occasion for the purposes of reducing the global item pool, describing the resulting scale properties, examining the dimensionality of the burden of stroke construct, and examining the known-groups validity of the instrument.
Sixty-four items were retained, comprising 12 internally consistent and unidimensional scales. Principal components analysis revealed three second-order factors (Physical Activity Limitations, Cognitive Activity Limitations, and Psychological Distress) comprising the Burden of Stroke construct. Comparisons between groups revealed that stroke survivors reported greater activity limitations and psychological distress on all scales relative to controls, and that stroke survivors with communication disorders reported greater activity limitations on swallowing, communication, cognition, and social relations scales relative to non–communicatively disordered stroke survivors.
These findings support the internal consistency of the BOSS scales, the hypothesized dimensionality of the burden of stroke construct, and the known-groups validity of the instrument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15528050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aphasia ; Appraisals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) ; Case-Control Studies ; Communication ; Communication disorders ; Epidemiology ; Estimates ; Female ; Focus groups ; General aspects ; Health status ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methodology ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neurology ; Older people ; Principal components analysis ; Psychometrics ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Qualitative research ; Quality of Life ; Research methods ; Self-Assessment ; Standard deviation ; Stroke ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Stroke - psychology ; Studies ; Validity ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2004-10, Vol.57 (10), p.997-1007</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ed70c49f25dc5f61954e7870d64642652c1895203b0f0ee613028a55a55023293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ed70c49f25dc5f61954e7870d64642652c1895203b0f0ee613028a55a55023293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16277194$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15528050$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Malcolm R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikolic, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hula, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, Amy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wambaugh, Julie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Rothi, Leslie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elman, Roberta J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>This study describes the conceptual foundation and psychometric properties of the Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS), a patient-reported health status assessment designed to quantify the physical, cognitive, and psychological burden of stroke.
Qualitative research methods were used to develop a 112-item pilot version of the instrument. The pilot version was administered to healthy controls (
n
=
251) and stroke survivors with (
n
=
135) and without (
n
=
146) communication disorders on a single occasion for the purposes of reducing the global item pool, describing the resulting scale properties, examining the dimensionality of the burden of stroke construct, and examining the known-groups validity of the instrument.
Sixty-four items were retained, comprising 12 internally consistent and unidimensional scales. Principal components analysis revealed three second-order factors (Physical Activity Limitations, Cognitive Activity Limitations, and Psychological Distress) comprising the Burden of Stroke construct. Comparisons between groups revealed that stroke survivors reported greater activity limitations and psychological distress on all scales relative to controls, and that stroke survivors with communication disorders reported greater activity limitations on swallowing, communication, cognition, and social relations scales relative to non–communicatively disordered stroke survivors.
These findings support the internal consistency of the BOSS scales, the hypothesized dimensionality of the burden of stroke construct, and the known-groups validity of the instrument.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Appraisals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS)</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stroke - psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkdtu1DAQhiMEotvCK1SWEKhcJNhO7CR3pRUnqVIvtlxbXntCHbL2YiepeCMekwlZVIkbJEu2R9_8c_iz7JzRglEm3_VFbwbn4eAKTmlZMFZg-Em2YU3d5KLl7Gm2oU0r8qoU8iQ7TamnlNW0Fs-zEyYEb6igm-zX3T2Qqyla8CR0ZDvG8B3I1ugByMXV7Xb7lhximJ2FRGY9OEu0tyTC4PQOkWRCBAJpdHs9IoIS3eTN6IJ3_tsf9gGGId_B8nWepLVAmuLs5hATeXDj_crhI0wjMWG_n7wzehEh1qWAzcX0InvW6SHBy-N9ln39-OHu-nN-c_vpy_X7m9xUnI852Jqaqu24sEZ0krWigrqpqZWVrLgU3DBcCqfljnYUQLKS8kYLgYfykrflWfZm1cWxf0w4mdq7ZHAG7SFMScmaVrKtFvDVP2AfpuixN8VoWbKaSdYgJVfKxJBShE4dIu4q_kRILU6qXv11Ui1OKsYUhjHx_Cg_7fZgH9OO1iHw-gjohHZ1UXvj0iMneV2ztkLucuUAtzY7iCoZB96AdRHMqGxw_-vlN_ltwLg</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Doyle, Patrick J.</creator><creator>McNeil, Malcolm R.</creator><creator>Mikolic, Joseph M.</creator><creator>Prieto, Luis</creator><creator>Hula, William D.</creator><creator>Lustig, Amy P.</creator><creator>Ross, Katherine</creator><creator>Wambaugh, Julie L.</creator><creator>Gonzalez-Rothi, Leslie J.</creator><creator>Elman, Roberta J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders</title><author>Doyle, Patrick J. ; McNeil, Malcolm R. ; Mikolic, Joseph M. ; Prieto, Luis ; Hula, William D. ; Lustig, Amy P. ; Ross, Katherine ; Wambaugh, Julie L. ; Gonzalez-Rothi, Leslie J. ; Elman, Roberta J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ed70c49f25dc5f61954e7870d64642652c1895203b0f0ee613028a55a55023293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Appraisals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS)</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stroke - psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Malcolm R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikolic, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hula, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, Amy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wambaugh, Julie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Rothi, Leslie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elman, Roberta J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doyle, Patrick J.</au><au>McNeil, Malcolm R.</au><au>Mikolic, Joseph M.</au><au>Prieto, Luis</au><au>Hula, William D.</au><au>Lustig, Amy P.</au><au>Ross, Katherine</au><au>Wambaugh, Julie L.</au><au>Gonzalez-Rothi, Leslie J.</au><au>Elman, Roberta J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>997</spage><epage>1007</epage><pages>997-1007</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>This study describes the conceptual foundation and psychometric properties of the Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS), a patient-reported health status assessment designed to quantify the physical, cognitive, and psychological burden of stroke.
Qualitative research methods were used to develop a 112-item pilot version of the instrument. The pilot version was administered to healthy controls (
n
=
251) and stroke survivors with (
n
=
135) and without (
n
=
146) communication disorders on a single occasion for the purposes of reducing the global item pool, describing the resulting scale properties, examining the dimensionality of the burden of stroke construct, and examining the known-groups validity of the instrument.
Sixty-four items were retained, comprising 12 internally consistent and unidimensional scales. Principal components analysis revealed three second-order factors (Physical Activity Limitations, Cognitive Activity Limitations, and Psychological Distress) comprising the Burden of Stroke construct. Comparisons between groups revealed that stroke survivors reported greater activity limitations and psychological distress on all scales relative to controls, and that stroke survivors with communication disorders reported greater activity limitations on swallowing, communication, cognition, and social relations scales relative to non–communicatively disordered stroke survivors.
These findings support the internal consistency of the BOSS scales, the hypothesized dimensionality of the burden of stroke construct, and the known-groups validity of the instrument.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15528050</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.016</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-4356 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2004-10, Vol.57 (10), p.997-1007 |
issn | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67046949 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aphasia Appraisals Biological and medical sciences Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) Case-Control Studies Communication Communication disorders Epidemiology Estimates Female Focus groups General aspects Health status Health Status Indicators Humans Male Medical sciences Methodology Middle Aged Mortality Neurology Older people Principal components analysis Psychometrics Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Qualitative research Quality of Life Research methods Self-Assessment Standard deviation Stroke Stroke - physiopathology Stroke - psychology Studies Validity Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system |
title | The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A26%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Burden%20of%20Stroke%20Scale%20(BOSS)%20provides%20valid%20and%20reliable%20score%20estimates%20of%20functioning%20and%20well-being%20in%20stroke%20survivors%20with%20and%20without%20communication%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Doyle,%20Patrick%20J.&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=997&rft.epage=1007&rft.pages=997-1007&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734327501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ed70c49f25dc5f61954e7870d64642652c1895203b0f0ee613028a55a55023293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033171618&rft_id=info:pmid/15528050&rfr_iscdi=true |