Cytogenetic profile in de novo acute myeloid leukemia with FAB subtypes M0, M1, and M2: a study based on 652 cases analyzed with morphology, cytogenetics, and fluorescence in situ hybridization

• Published in: Cancer genetics and cytogenetics 2004-11, Vol.155 (1), p.47-56
• Main Authors: Klaus, Mirjam, Haferlach, Torsten, Schnittger, Susanne, Kern, Wolfgang, Hiddemann, Wolfgang, Schoch, Claudia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cell Proliferation; Chromosome Aberrations; Cohort Studies; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Karyotyping; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - classification; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Translocation, Genetic
• ISSN: 0165-4608; 1873-4456
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.03.008

In about 55% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases, chromosome aberrations are detectable by cytogenetics. Close correlations between cytomorphology and cytogenetics have been reported. To determine a pattern of cytogenetic abnormalities within the French–American–British (FAB) subtypes AML M0, M1, and M2, we analyzed 48 AML M0, 179 AML M1, and 425 AML M2 and compared cytogenetic data to a cohort of 1,062 AML M3/3v, M4, M4eo, M5a/5b, M6, and M7. Cytogenetic abnormalities were significantly more frequent in AML M0 (71%) compared to M1 (49%), M2 (53%), and the total cohort (56%; P < 0.02). While +8 was the most common numeric abnormality in all FAB subtypes, +13, +14, and +11 were associated with AML M0–M2. The only recurring balanced translocation that was associated with one of these FAB subtypes was t(8;21) in M2 (12.5%) and, rarely, M1 (1.7%) (M0, 0% and M3–7, 0.09%; P = 0.001). To evaluate the frequency of cytogenetically undetectable abnormalities, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses in 273 AML M0–M2 with normal karyotype using probes for ETO, ABL, MLL, TEL, RB, P53, AML1, and BCR. In two cases we identified numerical aberrations of RB only in interphases nuclei. In seven additional cases, TEL and MLL abnormalities were found. In conclusion, t(8;21), +11, +13, and +14 are strongly associated with AML M0, M1, and M2. The FISH screening analyses identified abnormalities in an additional 3% in normal karyotypes.