Loading…

Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets

The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of orthodontics 2004-10, Vol.26 (5), p.531-534
Main Authors: Liu, Jia-Kuang, Chuang, Shu-Fen, Chang, Chuan-Yang, Pan, Yih-Jang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463
cites
container_end_page 534
container_issue 5
container_start_page 531
container_title European journal of orthodontics
container_volume 26
creator Liu, Jia-Kuang
Chuang, Shu-Fen
Chang, Chuan-Yang
Pan, Yih-Jang
description The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were used. After bonding, shear bond strengths in half the sample were tested within 30 minutes. The remaining 50 per cent were placed in a 37°C distilled water bath for 24 hours before testing. The results showed that the effects of the two adhesives and the interaction of the two time intervals and the two bracket types on shear bond strength were significantly different (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Six of the 10 groups were found to have less than 50 per cent of the adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after debonding in the 24 hour metal bracket–System 1+ group, but most specimens in the other seven groups had more than 50 per cent of the adhesive left. It is concluded that System 1+ cannot provide sufficient initial bond strength for Spirit MB and may increase the risk of enamel fracture for metal brackets.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ejo/26.5.531
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67066688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67066688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEURYMoWqs71zK4cOW0L5-TWUpRKwiKVBA3IZNm7NSZSU1S0H9vSouCq8fjHi6Xg9AZhhGGko7t0o2JGPERp3gPDTATkBOCYR8NADOccyqLI3QcwhIAqGTFITrCnFMhGRmg6cR1K-2b4PrM1VnTN7HRbRYWVvuscv08C9Hb_j0uwiZftTrExmQ6BZ2Niay8Nh82hhN0UOs22NPdHaKX25vZZJo_PN7dT64fcsO4jLlk2nBpK5s-bKo0w86NFEwLLjWuSUkBRFkAljXTIAWQimhDcFljYhgTdIgut70r7z7XNkTVNcHYttW9deugRAFCCCkTePEPXLq179M2RUCWpZB003a1hYx3IXhbq5VvOu2_FQa10auSXkWE4irpTfj5rnNddXb-B-98JiDfAk2I9us31_4jDaMFV9PXNzV7fpNPk0IqoD-CZ4OA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208996836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Liu, Jia-Kuang ; Chuang, Shu-Fen ; Chang, Chuan-Yang ; Pan, Yih-Jang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jia-Kuang ; Chuang, Shu-Fen ; Chang, Chuan-Yang ; Pan, Yih-Jang</creatorcontrib><description>The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were used. After bonding, shear bond strengths in half the sample were tested within 30 minutes. The remaining 50 per cent were placed in a 37°C distilled water bath for 24 hours before testing. The results showed that the effects of the two adhesives and the interaction of the two time intervals and the two bracket types on shear bond strength were significantly different (P &lt; 0.05 and P &lt; 0.0001, respectively). Six of the 10 groups were found to have less than 50 per cent of the adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after debonding in the 24 hour metal bracket–System 1+ group, but most specimens in the other seven groups had more than 50 per cent of the adhesive left. It is concluded that System 1+ cannot provide sufficient initial bond strength for Spirit MB and may increase the risk of enamel fracture for metal brackets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-5387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.5.531</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15536842</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJOODK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Analysis of Variance ; Dental Bonding ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Materials Testing - methods ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Shear Strength ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthodontics, 2004-10, Vol.26 (5), p.531-534</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15536842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jia-Kuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Shu-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chuan-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yih-Jang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets</title><title>European journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><description>The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were used. After bonding, shear bond strengths in half the sample were tested within 30 minutes. The remaining 50 per cent were placed in a 37°C distilled water bath for 24 hours before testing. The results showed that the effects of the two adhesives and the interaction of the two time intervals and the two bracket types on shear bond strength were significantly different (P &lt; 0.05 and P &lt; 0.0001, respectively). Six of the 10 groups were found to have less than 50 per cent of the adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after debonding in the 24 hour metal bracket–System 1+ group, but most specimens in the other seven groups had more than 50 per cent of the adhesive left. It is concluded that System 1+ cannot provide sufficient initial bond strength for Spirit MB and may increase the risk of enamel fracture for metal brackets.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Shear Strength</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0141-5387</issn><issn>1460-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEURYMoWqs71zK4cOW0L5-TWUpRKwiKVBA3IZNm7NSZSU1S0H9vSouCq8fjHi6Xg9AZhhGGko7t0o2JGPERp3gPDTATkBOCYR8NADOccyqLI3QcwhIAqGTFITrCnFMhGRmg6cR1K-2b4PrM1VnTN7HRbRYWVvuscv08C9Hb_j0uwiZftTrExmQ6BZ2Niay8Nh82hhN0UOs22NPdHaKX25vZZJo_PN7dT64fcsO4jLlk2nBpK5s-bKo0w86NFEwLLjWuSUkBRFkAljXTIAWQimhDcFljYhgTdIgut70r7z7XNkTVNcHYttW9deugRAFCCCkTePEPXLq179M2RUCWpZB003a1hYx3IXhbq5VvOu2_FQa10auSXkWE4irpTfj5rnNddXb-B-98JiDfAk2I9us31_4jDaMFV9PXNzV7fpNPk0IqoD-CZ4OA</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Liu, Jia-Kuang</creator><creator>Chuang, Shu-Fen</creator><creator>Chang, Chuan-Yang</creator><creator>Pan, Yih-Jang</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets</title><author>Liu, Jia-Kuang ; Chuang, Shu-Fen ; Chang, Chuan-Yang ; Pan, Yih-Jang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Shear Strength</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jia-Kuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Shu-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chuan-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yih-Jang</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Jia-Kuang</au><au>Chuang, Shu-Fen</au><au>Chang, Chuan-Yang</au><au>Pan, Yih-Jang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>531-534</pages><issn>0141-5387</issn><eissn>1460-2210</eissn><coden>EJOODK</coden><abstract>The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were used. After bonding, shear bond strengths in half the sample were tested within 30 minutes. The remaining 50 per cent were placed in a 37°C distilled water bath for 24 hours before testing. The results showed that the effects of the two adhesives and the interaction of the two time intervals and the two bracket types on shear bond strength were significantly different (P &lt; 0.05 and P &lt; 0.0001, respectively). Six of the 10 groups were found to have less than 50 per cent of the adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after debonding in the 24 hour metal bracket–System 1+ group, but most specimens in the other seven groups had more than 50 per cent of the adhesive left. It is concluded that System 1+ cannot provide sufficient initial bond strength for Spirit MB and may increase the risk of enamel fracture for metal brackets.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15536842</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejo/26.5.531</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-5387
ispartof European journal of orthodontics, 2004-10, Vol.26 (5), p.531-534
issn 0141-5387
1460-2210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67066688
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adhesives
Analysis of Variance
Dental Bonding
Dentistry
Humans
Materials Testing - methods
Orthodontic Brackets
Shear Strength
Time Factors
title Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A57%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20initial%20shear%20bond%20strengths%20of%20plastic%20and%20metal%20brackets&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Liu,%20Jia-Kuang&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=531-534&rft.issn=0141-5387&rft.eissn=1460-2210&rft.coden=EJOODK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejo/26.5.531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67066688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208996836&rft_id=info:pmid/15536842&rfr_iscdi=true