Loading…
Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets
The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of orthodontics 2004-10, Vol.26 (5), p.531-534 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 534 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 531 |
container_title | European journal of orthodontics |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Liu, Jia-Kuang Chuang, Shu-Fen Chang, Chuan-Yang Pan, Yih-Jang |
description | The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were used. After bonding, shear bond strengths in half the sample were tested within 30 minutes. The remaining 50 per cent were placed in a 37°C distilled water bath for 24 hours before testing. The results showed that the effects of the two adhesives and the interaction of the two time intervals and the two bracket types on shear bond strength were significantly different (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Six of the 10 groups were found to have less than 50 per cent of the adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after debonding in the 24 hour metal bracket–System 1+ group, but most specimens in the other seven groups had more than 50 per cent of the adhesive left. It is concluded that System 1+ cannot provide sufficient initial bond strength for Spirit MB and may increase the risk of enamel fracture for metal brackets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ejo/26.5.531 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67066688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67066688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEURYMoWqs71zK4cOW0L5-TWUpRKwiKVBA3IZNm7NSZSU1S0H9vSouCq8fjHi6Xg9AZhhGGko7t0o2JGPERp3gPDTATkBOCYR8NADOccyqLI3QcwhIAqGTFITrCnFMhGRmg6cR1K-2b4PrM1VnTN7HRbRYWVvuscv08C9Hb_j0uwiZftTrExmQ6BZ2Niay8Nh82hhN0UOs22NPdHaKX25vZZJo_PN7dT64fcsO4jLlk2nBpK5s-bKo0w86NFEwLLjWuSUkBRFkAljXTIAWQimhDcFljYhgTdIgut70r7z7XNkTVNcHYttW9deugRAFCCCkTePEPXLq179M2RUCWpZB003a1hYx3IXhbq5VvOu2_FQa10auSXkWE4irpTfj5rnNddXb-B-98JiDfAk2I9us31_4jDaMFV9PXNzV7fpNPk0IqoD-CZ4OA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208996836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Liu, Jia-Kuang ; Chuang, Shu-Fen ; Chang, Chuan-Yang ; Pan, Yih-Jang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jia-Kuang ; Chuang, Shu-Fen ; Chang, Chuan-Yang ; Pan, Yih-Jang</creatorcontrib><description>The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were used. After bonding, shear bond strengths in half the sample were tested within 30 minutes. The remaining 50 per cent were placed in a 37°C distilled water bath for 24 hours before testing. The results showed that the effects of the two adhesives and the interaction of the two time intervals and the two bracket types on shear bond strength were significantly different (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Six of the 10 groups were found to have less than 50 per cent of the adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after debonding in the 24 hour metal bracket–System 1+ group, but most specimens in the other seven groups had more than 50 per cent of the adhesive left. It is concluded that System 1+ cannot provide sufficient initial bond strength for Spirit MB and may increase the risk of enamel fracture for metal brackets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-5387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.5.531</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15536842</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJOODK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Analysis of Variance ; Dental Bonding ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Materials Testing - methods ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Shear Strength ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthodontics, 2004-10, Vol.26 (5), p.531-534</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15536842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jia-Kuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Shu-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chuan-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yih-Jang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets</title><title>European journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><description>The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were used. After bonding, shear bond strengths in half the sample were tested within 30 minutes. The remaining 50 per cent were placed in a 37°C distilled water bath for 24 hours before testing. The results showed that the effects of the two adhesives and the interaction of the two time intervals and the two bracket types on shear bond strength were significantly different (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Six of the 10 groups were found to have less than 50 per cent of the adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after debonding in the 24 hour metal bracket–System 1+ group, but most specimens in the other seven groups had more than 50 per cent of the adhesive left. It is concluded that System 1+ cannot provide sufficient initial bond strength for Spirit MB and may increase the risk of enamel fracture for metal brackets.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Shear Strength</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0141-5387</issn><issn>1460-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEURYMoWqs71zK4cOW0L5-TWUpRKwiKVBA3IZNm7NSZSU1S0H9vSouCq8fjHi6Xg9AZhhGGko7t0o2JGPERp3gPDTATkBOCYR8NADOccyqLI3QcwhIAqGTFITrCnFMhGRmg6cR1K-2b4PrM1VnTN7HRbRYWVvuscv08C9Hb_j0uwiZftTrExmQ6BZ2Niay8Nh82hhN0UOs22NPdHaKX25vZZJo_PN7dT64fcsO4jLlk2nBpK5s-bKo0w86NFEwLLjWuSUkBRFkAljXTIAWQimhDcFljYhgTdIgut70r7z7XNkTVNcHYttW9deugRAFCCCkTePEPXLq179M2RUCWpZB003a1hYx3IXhbq5VvOu2_FQa10auSXkWE4irpTfj5rnNddXb-B-98JiDfAk2I9us31_4jDaMFV9PXNzV7fpNPk0IqoD-CZ4OA</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Liu, Jia-Kuang</creator><creator>Chuang, Shu-Fen</creator><creator>Chang, Chuan-Yang</creator><creator>Pan, Yih-Jang</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets</title><author>Liu, Jia-Kuang ; Chuang, Shu-Fen ; Chang, Chuan-Yang ; Pan, Yih-Jang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Shear Strength</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jia-Kuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Shu-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chuan-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yih-Jang</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Jia-Kuang</au><au>Chuang, Shu-Fen</au><au>Chang, Chuan-Yang</au><au>Pan, Yih-Jang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>531-534</pages><issn>0141-5387</issn><eissn>1460-2210</eissn><coden>EJOODK</coden><abstract>The aims of this study were to compare initial and 24 hour shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base (Spirit MB) and metal brackets, using two different adhesives (System 1+ and Enlight), and to examine the modes of failure after debonding. Eighty extracted human premolars were used. After bonding, shear bond strengths in half the sample were tested within 30 minutes. The remaining 50 per cent were placed in a 37°C distilled water bath for 24 hours before testing. The results showed that the effects of the two adhesives and the interaction of the two time intervals and the two bracket types on shear bond strength were significantly different (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Six of the 10 groups were found to have less than 50 per cent of the adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after debonding in the 24 hour metal bracket–System 1+ group, but most specimens in the other seven groups had more than 50 per cent of the adhesive left. It is concluded that System 1+ cannot provide sufficient initial bond strength for Spirit MB and may increase the risk of enamel fracture for metal brackets.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15536842</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejo/26.5.531</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-5387 |
ispartof | European journal of orthodontics, 2004-10, Vol.26 (5), p.531-534 |
issn | 0141-5387 1460-2210 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67066688 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Adhesives Analysis of Variance Dental Bonding Dentistry Humans Materials Testing - methods Orthodontic Brackets Shear Strength Time Factors |
title | Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A57%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20initial%20shear%20bond%20strengths%20of%20plastic%20and%20metal%20brackets&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Liu,%20Jia-Kuang&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=531-534&rft.issn=0141-5387&rft.eissn=1460-2210&rft.coden=EJOODK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejo/26.5.531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67066688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-84ac58ebe4581cb536edc864a658a1f29300697018f4a08602b2ac219f12c4463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208996836&rft_id=info:pmid/15536842&rfr_iscdi=true |