Loading…

Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up

Objective( s): To compare the long-term effectiveness of two different laparoscopic colposuspension procedures. Study design: Sixty women affected by genuine stress incontinence (GSI) were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) and treated by transperitoneal laparoscopic colposu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2004-12, Vol.117 (2), p.201-203
Main Authors: Zullo, Fulvio, Palomba, Stefano, Russo, Tiziana, Sbano, Francesco Maria, Falbo, Angela, Morelli, Michele, Pellicano, Massimilano, Mastrantonio, Pasquale
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-99ef511dff35ec43bba3dbf5075a0775e113e870f23828dfa5158a3f95c120423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-99ef511dff35ec43bba3dbf5075a0775e113e870f23828dfa5158a3f95c120423
container_end_page 203
container_issue 2
container_start_page 201
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 117
creator Zullo, Fulvio
Palomba, Stefano
Russo, Tiziana
Sbano, Francesco Maria
Falbo, Angela
Morelli, Michele
Pellicano, Massimilano
Mastrantonio, Pasquale
description Objective( s): To compare the long-term effectiveness of two different laparoscopic colposuspension procedures. Study design: Sixty women affected by genuine stress incontinence (GSI) were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) and treated by transperitoneal laparoscopic colposuspension using nonabsorbable sutures (group A) or prolene mesh fixed with tackers or staplers (group B). In each group the subjective and objective failure rates were evaluated at 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. For the subjective evaluation patients were asked whether they had experienced urine leakage and any urine loss they reported was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The objective evaluation was performed by means of a clinical examination and multichannel urodynamic studies. The data were analyzed by the intention-to-treat method. Results: The subjective failure rate was significantly ( P < 0.05) lower in group A than in group B at 12 months (3.3% versus 13.3%, respectively), 24 months (20.0% versus 36.7%, respectively), and 36 months (33.3% versus 53.3%, respectively) after surgery. The objective failure rate also differed significantly ( P < 0.05) between the two groups after 12 (10.7% versus 25.0% for group A and group B, respectively), 24 (29.6% versus 57.7%, respectively), and 36 (42.3% versus 61.5%, respectively) months of follow-up. Conclusion( s): Laparoscopic colposuspension performed with sutures is more effective than laparoscopic colposuspension accomplished with the use of prolene meshes in the long term, and the use of prolene meshes should be avoided in treatment of GSI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.030
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67068282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211504002623</els_id><sourcerecordid>67068282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-99ef511dff35ec43bba3dbf5075a0775e113e870f23828dfa5158a3f95c120423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVJqV23_yAEXdLbuvpY7co5BIJp04KhPTRnodWOHJn1aqPxNvjfR4sNvmUYGBDPO4weQq45W3LGq--7JeziNjVLwVi5nFqyD2TOdS2KulLlFZnnF14IztWMfEbcsVxSrj6RGVeq5FrpOfm7sYNNEV0cgqMudkPEEQfoMcSejhj6LcXxMCZAGhMdUuygB7oHfAa8o5bK4gg2UR-7Lr4W4_CFfPS2Q_h6ngvy9PPHv_WvYvPn8ff6YVM4qfWhWK3AK85b76UCV8qmsbJtvGK1sqyuFXAuQdfMC6mFbr1VXGkr_Uo5Llgp5IJ8O-3NJ72MgAezD-ig62wPcURT1azKyQksT6DL38QE3gwp7G06Gs7MZNLszMmkmUyaqSXLsZvz_rHZQ3sJndVl4PYMWHS288n2LuCFqyQTQlWZuz9xkG38D5AMugC9gzYkcAfTxvD-JW--4ZOJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67068282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Zullo, Fulvio ; Palomba, Stefano ; Russo, Tiziana ; Sbano, Francesco Maria ; Falbo, Angela ; Morelli, Michele ; Pellicano, Massimilano ; Mastrantonio, Pasquale</creator><creatorcontrib>Zullo, Fulvio ; Palomba, Stefano ; Russo, Tiziana ; Sbano, Francesco Maria ; Falbo, Angela ; Morelli, Michele ; Pellicano, Massimilano ; Mastrantonio, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><description>Objective( s): To compare the long-term effectiveness of two different laparoscopic colposuspension procedures. Study design: Sixty women affected by genuine stress incontinence (GSI) were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) and treated by transperitoneal laparoscopic colposuspension using nonabsorbable sutures (group A) or prolene mesh fixed with tackers or staplers (group B). In each group the subjective and objective failure rates were evaluated at 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. For the subjective evaluation patients were asked whether they had experienced urine leakage and any urine loss they reported was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The objective evaluation was performed by means of a clinical examination and multichannel urodynamic studies. The data were analyzed by the intention-to-treat method. Results: The subjective failure rate was significantly ( P &lt; 0.05) lower in group A than in group B at 12 months (3.3% versus 13.3%, respectively), 24 months (20.0% versus 36.7%, respectively), and 36 months (33.3% versus 53.3%, respectively) after surgery. The objective failure rate also differed significantly ( P &lt; 0.05) between the two groups after 12 (10.7% versus 25.0% for group A and group B, respectively), 24 (29.6% versus 57.7%, respectively), and 36 (42.3% versus 61.5%, respectively) months of follow-up. Conclusion( s): Laparoscopic colposuspension performed with sutures is more effective than laparoscopic colposuspension accomplished with the use of prolene meshes in the long term, and the use of prolene meshes should be avoided in treatment of GSI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15541858</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EOGRAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Burch ; Colposcopy - methods ; Colposuspension ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Medical sciences ; Mesh ; Prospective Studies ; Surgical Mesh ; Suture ; Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Urodynamics</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2004-12, Vol.117 (2), p.201-203</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-99ef511dff35ec43bba3dbf5075a0775e113e870f23828dfa5158a3f95c120423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-99ef511dff35ec43bba3dbf5075a0775e113e870f23828dfa5158a3f95c120423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16302256$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15541858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zullo, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomba, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sbano, Francesco Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falbo, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellicano, Massimilano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastrantonio, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Objective( s): To compare the long-term effectiveness of two different laparoscopic colposuspension procedures. Study design: Sixty women affected by genuine stress incontinence (GSI) were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) and treated by transperitoneal laparoscopic colposuspension using nonabsorbable sutures (group A) or prolene mesh fixed with tackers or staplers (group B). In each group the subjective and objective failure rates were evaluated at 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. For the subjective evaluation patients were asked whether they had experienced urine leakage and any urine loss they reported was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The objective evaluation was performed by means of a clinical examination and multichannel urodynamic studies. The data were analyzed by the intention-to-treat method. Results: The subjective failure rate was significantly ( P &lt; 0.05) lower in group A than in group B at 12 months (3.3% versus 13.3%, respectively), 24 months (20.0% versus 36.7%, respectively), and 36 months (33.3% versus 53.3%, respectively) after surgery. The objective failure rate also differed significantly ( P &lt; 0.05) between the two groups after 12 (10.7% versus 25.0% for group A and group B, respectively), 24 (29.6% versus 57.7%, respectively), and 36 (42.3% versus 61.5%, respectively) months of follow-up. Conclusion( s): Laparoscopic colposuspension performed with sutures is more effective than laparoscopic colposuspension accomplished with the use of prolene meshes in the long term, and the use of prolene meshes should be avoided in treatment of GSI.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burch</subject><subject>Colposcopy - methods</subject><subject>Colposuspension</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mesh</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Suture</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVJqV23_yAEXdLbuvpY7co5BIJp04KhPTRnodWOHJn1aqPxNvjfR4sNvmUYGBDPO4weQq45W3LGq--7JeziNjVLwVi5nFqyD2TOdS2KulLlFZnnF14IztWMfEbcsVxSrj6RGVeq5FrpOfm7sYNNEV0cgqMudkPEEQfoMcSejhj6LcXxMCZAGhMdUuygB7oHfAa8o5bK4gg2UR-7Lr4W4_CFfPS2Q_h6ngvy9PPHv_WvYvPn8ff6YVM4qfWhWK3AK85b76UCV8qmsbJtvGK1sqyuFXAuQdfMC6mFbr1VXGkr_Uo5Llgp5IJ8O-3NJ72MgAezD-ig62wPcURT1azKyQksT6DL38QE3gwp7G06Gs7MZNLszMmkmUyaqSXLsZvz_rHZQ3sJndVl4PYMWHS288n2LuCFqyQTQlWZuz9xkG38D5AMugC9gzYkcAfTxvD-JW--4ZOJ</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Zullo, Fulvio</creator><creator>Palomba, Stefano</creator><creator>Russo, Tiziana</creator><creator>Sbano, Francesco Maria</creator><creator>Falbo, Angela</creator><creator>Morelli, Michele</creator><creator>Pellicano, Massimilano</creator><creator>Mastrantonio, Pasquale</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up</title><author>Zullo, Fulvio ; Palomba, Stefano ; Russo, Tiziana ; Sbano, Francesco Maria ; Falbo, Angela ; Morelli, Michele ; Pellicano, Massimilano ; Mastrantonio, Pasquale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-99ef511dff35ec43bba3dbf5075a0775e113e870f23828dfa5158a3f95c120423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burch</topic><topic>Colposcopy - methods</topic><topic>Colposuspension</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mesh</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Suture</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zullo, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomba, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sbano, Francesco Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falbo, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellicano, Massimilano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastrantonio, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zullo, Fulvio</au><au>Palomba, Stefano</au><au>Russo, Tiziana</au><au>Sbano, Francesco Maria</au><au>Falbo, Angela</au><au>Morelli, Michele</au><au>Pellicano, Massimilano</au><au>Mastrantonio, Pasquale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>201-203</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><coden>EOGRAL</coden><abstract>Objective( s): To compare the long-term effectiveness of two different laparoscopic colposuspension procedures. Study design: Sixty women affected by genuine stress incontinence (GSI) were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) and treated by transperitoneal laparoscopic colposuspension using nonabsorbable sutures (group A) or prolene mesh fixed with tackers or staplers (group B). In each group the subjective and objective failure rates were evaluated at 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. For the subjective evaluation patients were asked whether they had experienced urine leakage and any urine loss they reported was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The objective evaluation was performed by means of a clinical examination and multichannel urodynamic studies. The data were analyzed by the intention-to-treat method. Results: The subjective failure rate was significantly ( P &lt; 0.05) lower in group A than in group B at 12 months (3.3% versus 13.3%, respectively), 24 months (20.0% versus 36.7%, respectively), and 36 months (33.3% versus 53.3%, respectively) after surgery. The objective failure rate also differed significantly ( P &lt; 0.05) between the two groups after 12 (10.7% versus 25.0% for group A and group B, respectively), 24 (29.6% versus 57.7%, respectively), and 36 (42.3% versus 61.5%, respectively) months of follow-up. Conclusion( s): Laparoscopic colposuspension performed with sutures is more effective than laparoscopic colposuspension accomplished with the use of prolene meshes in the long term, and the use of prolene meshes should be avoided in treatment of GSI.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>15541858</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.030</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2004-12, Vol.117 (2), p.201-203
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67068282
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Burch
Colposcopy - methods
Colposuspension
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Laparoscopy
Medical sciences
Mesh
Prospective Studies
Surgical Mesh
Suture
Suture Techniques
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery
Urodynamics
title Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A44%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20colposuspension%20using%20sutures%20or%20prolene%20meshes:%20a%203-year%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Zullo,%20Fulvio&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=201-203&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft.coden=EOGRAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67068282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-99ef511dff35ec43bba3dbf5075a0775e113e870f23828dfa5158a3f95c120423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67068282&rft_id=info:pmid/15541858&rfr_iscdi=true