Ovulation stimulation after treatment for a molar pregnancy for or against?

The case of a 29-year-old patient who underwent invitro fertilization due to secondary sterility, after a spontaneous but molar pregnancy, is described. Afterwards there was no spontaneous conception for five years. With the couple's consent, we decided to perform in vitro fertilization, i.e.,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of gynaecological oncology 2009, Vol.30 (1), p.98-99
Main Authors: Gojnic, M, Dugalic, V, Brankovic, M, Pervulov, M, Vasiljevic, B, Fazlagic, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Contraindications
Female
Humans
Hydatidiform Mole - pathology
Hydatidiform Mole - secondary
Hydatidiform Mole - surgery
Ileus - etiology
Infertility, Female - etiology
Omentum - pathology
Ovarian Cysts - complications
Ovarian Cysts - etiology
Ovarian Cysts - pathology
Ovulation Induction - adverse effects
Pregnancy
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - adverse effects
Uterine Neoplasms - complications
Uterine Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Neoplasms - surgery
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The case of a 29-year-old patient who underwent invitro fertilization due to secondary sterility, after a spontaneous but molar pregnancy, is described. Afterwards there was no spontaneous conception for five years. With the couple's consent, we decided to perform in vitro fertilization, i.e., ovulation induction and the ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) method.
ISSN:0392-2936