Loading…

Olfactory ensheathing glia and Schwann cells exhibit a distinct interaction behavior with meningeal cells

Schwann cells (SCs) and olfactory ensheathing glia (OEG) have both been used as cellular transplants to promote spinal cord repair. Both cell types support axonal regeneration and have beneficial effects on functional recovery. A significant difference between SCs and OEG is the effect of these cell...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuroscience research 2009-05, Vol.87 (7), p.1556-1564
Main Authors: Franssen, Elske H. P., Roet, Kasper C. D., de Bree, Freddy M., Verhaagen, Joost
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-f2b1e4f7bd54f3e3591341fa08be3387cda85fe663f2684eab6c481d668c95a23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-f2b1e4f7bd54f3e3591341fa08be3387cda85fe663f2684eab6c481d668c95a23
container_end_page 1564
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1556
container_title Journal of neuroscience research
container_volume 87
creator Franssen, Elske H. P.
Roet, Kasper C. D.
de Bree, Freddy M.
Verhaagen, Joost
description Schwann cells (SCs) and olfactory ensheathing glia (OEG) have both been used as cellular transplants to promote spinal cord repair. Both cell types support axonal regeneration and have beneficial effects on functional recovery. A significant difference between SCs and OEG is the effect of these cell types on astrocytes (ACs) present in the neural scar. In contrast to OEG, which associate and intermingle with ACs, SCs and ACs form separate cellular territories. Here, we show that OEG and SCs also interact differently with meningeal cells (MCs), another major cellular component of the neural scar. Whereas OEG intermingle with MCs in cocultures, SCs aggregate into well‐defined cell clusters. Our data suggest that (a) soluble factor(s) as well as direct cellular contact are involved in the MC‐induced SC clustering. Furthermore, the cluster formation of SCs in coculture with MCs is different from the previously reported segregation of SCs and ACs in coculture. The present results help to understand the differential behavior of both cell types after transplantation in the injured spinal cord and will be important to either determine which cell has optimal capacities to render the scar more permissive for regeneration, or to exploit the transplantation of both cell types in combination. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jnr.21979
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67115139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20565384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-f2b1e4f7bd54f3e3591341fa08be3387cda85fe663f2684eab6c481d668c95a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtP3DAURi1UVAbaRf9A5VWlLgJ-J14CanmIh1So2p3lONfENONQO8Mw_55ABrpCXd3N-Y7uvR9CnyjZpYSwvduYdhnVpd5AM0p0WQgpyndoRrgihSCUbaHtnG8JIVpL_h5tUU0FYYzPULjsvHVDn1YYYm7BDm2IN_imCxbb2OAr1y5tjNhB12UMD22ow4AtbkIeQnQDDnGANBpCH3ENrb0PfcLLMLR4DnFUge2m8Ae06W2X4eN67qCf379dHx4XZ5dHJ4f7Z4UTrNSFZzUF4cu6kcJz4FJTLqi3pKqB86p0ja2kB6W4Z6oSYGvlREUbpSqnpWV8B32ZvHep_7uAPJh5yE8b2Aj9IhtVUiop1_8FGZFK8kqM4NcJdKnPOYE3dynMbVoZSsxTAWYswDwXMLKf19JFPYfmH7n--AjsTcAydLB622ROL368KIspMb4cHl4TNv0Zb-GlNL8ujow4OL--ovS3OeCPRyygGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20565384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Olfactory ensheathing glia and Schwann cells exhibit a distinct interaction behavior with meningeal cells</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Franssen, Elske H. P. ; Roet, Kasper C. D. ; de Bree, Freddy M. ; Verhaagen, Joost</creator><creatorcontrib>Franssen, Elske H. P. ; Roet, Kasper C. D. ; de Bree, Freddy M. ; Verhaagen, Joost</creatorcontrib><description>Schwann cells (SCs) and olfactory ensheathing glia (OEG) have both been used as cellular transplants to promote spinal cord repair. Both cell types support axonal regeneration and have beneficial effects on functional recovery. A significant difference between SCs and OEG is the effect of these cell types on astrocytes (ACs) present in the neural scar. In contrast to OEG, which associate and intermingle with ACs, SCs and ACs form separate cellular territories. Here, we show that OEG and SCs also interact differently with meningeal cells (MCs), another major cellular component of the neural scar. Whereas OEG intermingle with MCs in cocultures, SCs aggregate into well‐defined cell clusters. Our data suggest that (a) soluble factor(s) as well as direct cellular contact are involved in the MC‐induced SC clustering. Furthermore, the cluster formation of SCs in coculture with MCs is different from the previously reported segregation of SCs and ACs in coculture. The present results help to understand the differential behavior of both cell types after transplantation in the injured spinal cord and will be important to either determine which cell has optimal capacities to render the scar more permissive for regeneration, or to exploit the transplantation of both cell types in combination. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-4012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jnr.21979</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19140223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Astrocytes - physiology ; Cell Aggregation - physiology ; Coculture Techniques ; Culture Media, Conditioned ; Female ; Immunohistochemistry ; Meninges - cytology ; Meninges - physiology ; Meninges - secretion ; Neuroglia - physiology ; Olfactory Bulb - physiology ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred F344 ; regeneration ; Schwann Cells - physiology ; Sciatic Nerve - physiology ; spinal cord ; transplantation</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroscience research, 2009-05, Vol.87 (7), p.1556-1564</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-f2b1e4f7bd54f3e3591341fa08be3387cda85fe663f2684eab6c481d668c95a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-f2b1e4f7bd54f3e3591341fa08be3387cda85fe663f2684eab6c481d668c95a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19140223$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franssen, Elske H. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roet, Kasper C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bree, Freddy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhaagen, Joost</creatorcontrib><title>Olfactory ensheathing glia and Schwann cells exhibit a distinct interaction behavior with meningeal cells</title><title>Journal of neuroscience research</title><addtitle>J. Neurosci. Res</addtitle><description>Schwann cells (SCs) and olfactory ensheathing glia (OEG) have both been used as cellular transplants to promote spinal cord repair. Both cell types support axonal regeneration and have beneficial effects on functional recovery. A significant difference between SCs and OEG is the effect of these cell types on astrocytes (ACs) present in the neural scar. In contrast to OEG, which associate and intermingle with ACs, SCs and ACs form separate cellular territories. Here, we show that OEG and SCs also interact differently with meningeal cells (MCs), another major cellular component of the neural scar. Whereas OEG intermingle with MCs in cocultures, SCs aggregate into well‐defined cell clusters. Our data suggest that (a) soluble factor(s) as well as direct cellular contact are involved in the MC‐induced SC clustering. Furthermore, the cluster formation of SCs in coculture with MCs is different from the previously reported segregation of SCs and ACs in coculture. The present results help to understand the differential behavior of both cell types after transplantation in the injured spinal cord and will be important to either determine which cell has optimal capacities to render the scar more permissive for regeneration, or to exploit the transplantation of both cell types in combination. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Astrocytes - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Aggregation - physiology</subject><subject>Coculture Techniques</subject><subject>Culture Media, Conditioned</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Meninges - cytology</subject><subject>Meninges - physiology</subject><subject>Meninges - secretion</subject><subject>Neuroglia - physiology</subject><subject>Olfactory Bulb - physiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred F344</subject><subject>regeneration</subject><subject>Schwann Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Sciatic Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>spinal cord</subject><subject>transplantation</subject><issn>0360-4012</issn><issn>1097-4547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtP3DAURi1UVAbaRf9A5VWlLgJ-J14CanmIh1So2p3lONfENONQO8Mw_55ABrpCXd3N-Y7uvR9CnyjZpYSwvduYdhnVpd5AM0p0WQgpyndoRrgihSCUbaHtnG8JIVpL_h5tUU0FYYzPULjsvHVDn1YYYm7BDm2IN_imCxbb2OAr1y5tjNhB12UMD22ow4AtbkIeQnQDDnGANBpCH3ENrb0PfcLLMLR4DnFUge2m8Ae06W2X4eN67qCf379dHx4XZ5dHJ4f7Z4UTrNSFZzUF4cu6kcJz4FJTLqi3pKqB86p0ja2kB6W4Z6oSYGvlREUbpSqnpWV8B32ZvHep_7uAPJh5yE8b2Aj9IhtVUiop1_8FGZFK8kqM4NcJdKnPOYE3dynMbVoZSsxTAWYswDwXMLKf19JFPYfmH7n--AjsTcAydLB622ROL368KIspMb4cHl4TNv0Zb-GlNL8ujow4OL--ovS3OeCPRyygGg</recordid><startdate>20090515</startdate><enddate>20090515</enddate><creator>Franssen, Elske H. P.</creator><creator>Roet, Kasper C. D.</creator><creator>de Bree, Freddy M.</creator><creator>Verhaagen, Joost</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090515</creationdate><title>Olfactory ensheathing glia and Schwann cells exhibit a distinct interaction behavior with meningeal cells</title><author>Franssen, Elske H. P. ; Roet, Kasper C. D. ; de Bree, Freddy M. ; Verhaagen, Joost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-f2b1e4f7bd54f3e3591341fa08be3387cda85fe663f2684eab6c481d668c95a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Astrocytes - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Aggregation - physiology</topic><topic>Coculture Techniques</topic><topic>Culture Media, Conditioned</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Meninges - cytology</topic><topic>Meninges - physiology</topic><topic>Meninges - secretion</topic><topic>Neuroglia - physiology</topic><topic>Olfactory Bulb - physiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred F344</topic><topic>regeneration</topic><topic>Schwann Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Sciatic Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>spinal cord</topic><topic>transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franssen, Elske H. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roet, Kasper C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bree, Freddy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhaagen, Joost</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franssen, Elske H. P.</au><au>Roet, Kasper C. D.</au><au>de Bree, Freddy M.</au><au>Verhaagen, Joost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Olfactory ensheathing glia and Schwann cells exhibit a distinct interaction behavior with meningeal cells</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Neurosci. Res</addtitle><date>2009-05-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1556</spage><epage>1564</epage><pages>1556-1564</pages><issn>0360-4012</issn><eissn>1097-4547</eissn><abstract>Schwann cells (SCs) and olfactory ensheathing glia (OEG) have both been used as cellular transplants to promote spinal cord repair. Both cell types support axonal regeneration and have beneficial effects on functional recovery. A significant difference between SCs and OEG is the effect of these cell types on astrocytes (ACs) present in the neural scar. In contrast to OEG, which associate and intermingle with ACs, SCs and ACs form separate cellular territories. Here, we show that OEG and SCs also interact differently with meningeal cells (MCs), another major cellular component of the neural scar. Whereas OEG intermingle with MCs in cocultures, SCs aggregate into well‐defined cell clusters. Our data suggest that (a) soluble factor(s) as well as direct cellular contact are involved in the MC‐induced SC clustering. Furthermore, the cluster formation of SCs in coculture with MCs is different from the previously reported segregation of SCs and ACs in coculture. The present results help to understand the differential behavior of both cell types after transplantation in the injured spinal cord and will be important to either determine which cell has optimal capacities to render the scar more permissive for regeneration, or to exploit the transplantation of both cell types in combination. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>19140223</pmid><doi>10.1002/jnr.21979</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-4012
ispartof Journal of neuroscience research, 2009-05, Vol.87 (7), p.1556-1564
issn 0360-4012
1097-4547
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67115139
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
Astrocytes - physiology
Cell Aggregation - physiology
Coculture Techniques
Culture Media, Conditioned
Female
Immunohistochemistry
Meninges - cytology
Meninges - physiology
Meninges - secretion
Neuroglia - physiology
Olfactory Bulb - physiology
Rats
Rats, Inbred F344
regeneration
Schwann Cells - physiology
Sciatic Nerve - physiology
spinal cord
transplantation
title Olfactory ensheathing glia and Schwann cells exhibit a distinct interaction behavior with meningeal cells
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T21%3A47%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Olfactory%20ensheathing%20glia%20and%20Schwann%20cells%20exhibit%20a%20distinct%20interaction%20behavior%20with%20meningeal%20cells&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroscience%20research&rft.au=Franssen,%20Elske%20H.%20P.&rft.date=2009-05-15&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1556&rft.epage=1564&rft.pages=1556-1564&rft.issn=0360-4012&rft.eissn=1097-4547&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jnr.21979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20565384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-f2b1e4f7bd54f3e3591341fa08be3387cda85fe663f2684eab6c481d668c95a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20565384&rft_id=info:pmid/19140223&rfr_iscdi=true