Loading…

Covariation bias for social events and signs of (dis)approval in high and low socially anxious individuals

Abstract In two covariation bias experiments, we investigated whether socially anxious women overestimate the contingency between social events and signs of rejection and/or to underestimate the contingency between social events and approval. Participants were exposed to descriptions of ambiguous or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 2009-06, Vol.40 (2), p.359-373
Main Authors: de Jong, Peter J, de Graaf-Peters, Victorine, van Hout, Wiljo J.P.J, van Wees, Rineke
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract In two covariation bias experiments, we investigated whether socially anxious women overestimate the contingency between social events and signs of rejection and/or to underestimate the contingency between social events and approval. Participants were exposed to descriptions of ambiguous or negative social events, situations involving animals, and nature scenes that were randomly paired with disgusting, happy, and neutral faces. Socially anxious participants reported enhanced belongingness between ambiguous events and signs of rejection, together with reduced belongingness between negative events and approval. This contributes to previous findings suggesting that socially anxious individuals suffer from fear-confirming interpretive biases. There was no evidence for enhanced negative or reduced positive covariation bias in socially anxious individuals.
ISSN:0005-7916
1873-7943
DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.02.001