Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology

Teledermatology refers to the use of information and communication technologies (such as videoconferencing or transmission of digital images) to enable the practice of diagnostic dermatology between participants separated by geographic distance. The objective of this study was to critically review t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical systems 2004-12, Vol.28 (6), p.575-579
Main Authors: Demiris, George, Speedie, Stuart M, Hicks, Lanis L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Computer applications
Dermatology
Dermatology - methods
Expert systems
Focus Groups
Health care
Humans
Medical Informatics Applications
Medicine
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Satisfaction
Physician-Patient Relations
Remote Consultation - methods
Remote Consultation - standards
Telemedicine
Telemedicine - methods
Telemedicine - standards
Videoconferencing
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ce7f28efb7e275c056040341f0b6a954e84fab5426e9ac8699905fa8bfe588e93
cites
container_end_page 579
container_issue 6
container_start_page 575
container_title Journal of medical systems
container_volume 28
creator Demiris, George
Speedie, Stuart M
Hicks, Lanis L
description Teledermatology refers to the use of information and communication technologies (such as videoconferencing or transmission of digital images) to enable the practice of diagnostic dermatology between participants separated by geographic distance. The objective of this study was to critically review the quality of evidence about patient satisfaction with teledermatology applications. Sample size, reporting of validity and reliability, used instrument and its underlying constructs were determined for all studies where information was available. Fourteen studies were identified, five refer to store-and-forward applications, the remaining ones describe video-based systems. The systematic review demonstrated that methodological deficiencies in the published research impact the generalizability of findings. The two types of teledermatology (video-based and store-and-forward) require different satisfaction instruments as they are based on different contexts of care delivery, with video-mediated communication being key in the former and patients' absence from the diagnostic process in the latter mode of care delivery.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/B:JOMS.0000044959.71456.df
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67191359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29068941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ce7f28efb7e275c056040341f0b6a954e84fab5426e9ac8699905fa8bfe588e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPGzEQgK2qqAnQv1CtOJTTpvba40dugAq0gDi0lXqzvN4xbLSPsHaE-Pd1SCSkXvDF1vibGc18hJwwumC04t_Olz_v734t6PYIYcAsFBMgF034QOYMFC-lNn8_kjllQpcARs_IYYyrjBsp1ScyYyAZVBrm5OYsRoyxxyEVYyjWLrX5GU8L5z2ukxs8buNuaIqY_2JwPrXjUDy36bFI2GGDU-_S2I0PL8fkILgu4uf9fUT-XH7_fXFd3t5f_bg4uy09VzKVHlWoNIZaYaXAU5BUUC5YoLV0BgRqEVwNopJonNfSGEMhOF0HBK3R8CPydVd3PY1PG4zJ9m302HVuwHETrVTMMA7vg6BkRaXm74KVyZgRLIMn_4GrcTMNeVqrQOV9cyMztNxBfhpjnDDY9dT2bnqxjNqtQXtutwbtm0H7atA2ISd_2XfY1D02b6l7ZfwfuSqYNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757014396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Demiris, George ; Speedie, Stuart M ; Hicks, Lanis L</creator><creatorcontrib>Demiris, George ; Speedie, Stuart M ; Hicks, Lanis L</creatorcontrib><description>Teledermatology refers to the use of information and communication technologies (such as videoconferencing or transmission of digital images) to enable the practice of diagnostic dermatology between participants separated by geographic distance. The objective of this study was to critically review the quality of evidence about patient satisfaction with teledermatology applications. Sample size, reporting of validity and reliability, used instrument and its underlying constructs were determined for all studies where information was available. Fourteen studies were identified, five refer to store-and-forward applications, the remaining ones describe video-based systems. The systematic review demonstrated that methodological deficiencies in the published research impact the generalizability of findings. The two types of teledermatology (video-based and store-and-forward) require different satisfaction instruments as they are based on different contexts of care delivery, with video-mediated communication being key in the former and patients' absence from the diagnostic process in the latter mode of care delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-5598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-689X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/B:JOMS.0000044959.71456.df</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15615285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Computer applications ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - methods ; Expert systems ; Focus Groups ; Health care ; Humans ; Medical Informatics Applications ; Medicine ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Remote Consultation - methods ; Remote Consultation - standards ; Telemedicine ; Telemedicine - methods ; Telemedicine - standards ; Videoconferencing</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical systems, 2004-12, Vol.28 (6), p.575-579</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ce7f28efb7e275c056040341f0b6a954e84fab5426e9ac8699905fa8bfe588e93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34136</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15615285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demiris, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speedie, Stuart M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Lanis L</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology</title><title>Journal of medical systems</title><addtitle>J Med Syst</addtitle><description>Teledermatology refers to the use of information and communication technologies (such as videoconferencing or transmission of digital images) to enable the practice of diagnostic dermatology between participants separated by geographic distance. The objective of this study was to critically review the quality of evidence about patient satisfaction with teledermatology applications. Sample size, reporting of validity and reliability, used instrument and its underlying constructs were determined for all studies where information was available. Fourteen studies were identified, five refer to store-and-forward applications, the remaining ones describe video-based systems. The systematic review demonstrated that methodological deficiencies in the published research impact the generalizability of findings. The two types of teledermatology (video-based and store-and-forward) require different satisfaction instruments as they are based on different contexts of care delivery, with video-mediated communication being key in the former and patients' absence from the diagnostic process in the latter mode of care delivery.</description><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - methods</subject><subject>Expert systems</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Informatics Applications</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Remote Consultation - methods</subject><subject>Remote Consultation - standards</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Telemedicine - methods</subject><subject>Telemedicine - standards</subject><subject>Videoconferencing</subject><issn>0148-5598</issn><issn>1573-689X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtPGzEQgK2qqAnQv1CtOJTTpvba40dugAq0gDi0lXqzvN4xbLSPsHaE-Pd1SCSkXvDF1vibGc18hJwwumC04t_Olz_v734t6PYIYcAsFBMgF034QOYMFC-lNn8_kjllQpcARs_IYYyrjBsp1ScyYyAZVBrm5OYsRoyxxyEVYyjWLrX5GU8L5z2ukxs8buNuaIqY_2JwPrXjUDy36bFI2GGDU-_S2I0PL8fkILgu4uf9fUT-XH7_fXFd3t5f_bg4uy09VzKVHlWoNIZaYaXAU5BUUC5YoLV0BgRqEVwNopJonNfSGEMhOF0HBK3R8CPydVd3PY1PG4zJ9m302HVuwHETrVTMMA7vg6BkRaXm74KVyZgRLIMn_4GrcTMNeVqrQOV9cyMztNxBfhpjnDDY9dT2bnqxjNqtQXtutwbtm0H7atA2ISd_2XfY1D02b6l7ZfwfuSqYNQ</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Demiris, George</creator><creator>Speedie, Stuart M</creator><creator>Hicks, Lanis L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology</title><author>Demiris, George ; Speedie, Stuart M ; Hicks, Lanis L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ce7f28efb7e275c056040341f0b6a954e84fab5426e9ac8699905fa8bfe588e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - methods</topic><topic>Expert systems</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Informatics Applications</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Remote Consultation - methods</topic><topic>Remote Consultation - standards</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Telemedicine - methods</topic><topic>Telemedicine - standards</topic><topic>Videoconferencing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demiris, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speedie, Stuart M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Lanis L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demiris, George</au><au>Speedie, Stuart M</au><au>Hicks, Lanis L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical systems</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Syst</addtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>575-579</pages><issn>0148-5598</issn><eissn>1573-689X</eissn><abstract>Teledermatology refers to the use of information and communication technologies (such as videoconferencing or transmission of digital images) to enable the practice of diagnostic dermatology between participants separated by geographic distance. The objective of this study was to critically review the quality of evidence about patient satisfaction with teledermatology applications. Sample size, reporting of validity and reliability, used instrument and its underlying constructs were determined for all studies where information was available. Fourteen studies were identified, five refer to store-and-forward applications, the remaining ones describe video-based systems. The systematic review demonstrated that methodological deficiencies in the published research impact the generalizability of findings. The two types of teledermatology (video-based and store-and-forward) require different satisfaction instruments as they are based on different contexts of care delivery, with video-mediated communication being key in the former and patients' absence from the diagnostic process in the latter mode of care delivery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15615285</pmid><doi>10.1023/B:JOMS.0000044959.71456.df</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-5598
ispartof Journal of medical systems, 2004-12, Vol.28 (6), p.575-579
issn 0148-5598
1573-689X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67191359
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Springer Link
subjects Computer applications
Dermatology
Dermatology - methods
Expert systems
Focus Groups
Health care
Humans
Medical Informatics Applications
Medicine
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Satisfaction
Physician-Patient Relations
Remote Consultation - methods
Remote Consultation - standards
Telemedicine
Telemedicine - methods
Telemedicine - standards
Videoconferencing
title Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A30%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20patients'%20acceptance%20of%20and%20satisfaction%20with%20teledermatology&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20systems&rft.au=Demiris,%20George&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=575-579&rft.issn=0148-5598&rft.eissn=1573-689X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/B:JOMS.0000044959.71456.df&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29068941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-ce7f28efb7e275c056040341f0b6a954e84fab5426e9ac8699905fa8bfe588e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757014396&rft_id=info:pmid/15615285&rfr_iscdi=true