Loading…
The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone
The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (bla...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B 2009-06, Vol.89A (4), p.942-950 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633 |
container_end_page | 950 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 942 |
container_title | Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B |
container_volume | 89A |
creator | Sul, Young-Taeg Kang, Byung-Soo Johansson, Carina Um, Heung-Sik Park, Chan-Jin Albrektsson, Tomas |
description | The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine‐turned, aluminum oxide‐blasted, and processed with the micro‐arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.a.32041 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67212559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67212559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtz0zAUhTUMDH3Aij2jFZuOg_V0vCylKZAWNgW608j2VaJiW0aSJ82_R27SdkcXGml0v3N0dQ9C70g-I3lOP95W3UzPGM05eYEOiRA046UUL6czLzNGS3mAjkK4TbDMBX2NDsicF3lJ80O0uV4D9q6FgJ3BYfRG14DrNXQ2RL_Fum9wdINbeT2st9j2OCZBKkG_iuv7stcRJrELAZztIyQ2WtdPd9FG3duxw7YbWt3HMDlUroc36JXRbYC3-_0Y_VycX599yS5_XHw9O73Mas44yYwpJCFMSFqQgjSU1U1hgDQVN7oxQjDNqpqXoiF0Lpnh87zkNaOyqakkWjJ2jE52vmEDw1ipwdtO-61y2qrP9tepcn6V1qjYXBaJ_rCjB-_-jhCiSmOooU2tgxuDkgUlVIjyWZBxVkhZ0qf3a5_m48E8dkByNcWnUnxKq_v4Ev1-bztWHTRP7D6vBJAdsLEtbP_npb59unowzXaalCjcPWq0_5P-wwqhfn-_UDfsarlcLm7Ugv0DK0C2Og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34376692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Sul, Young-Taeg ; Kang, Byung-Soo ; Johansson, Carina ; Um, Heung-Sik ; Park, Chan-Jin ; Albrektsson, Tomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Sul, Young-Taeg ; Kang, Byung-Soo ; Johansson, Carina ; Um, Heung-Sik ; Park, Chan-Jin ; Albrektsson, Tomas</creatorcontrib><description>The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine‐turned, aluminum oxide‐blasted, and processed with the micro‐arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-3296</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-4636</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18470920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; bone ; Bone and Bones - physiology ; Chickens ; Implants, Experimental ; Kirurgi ; Kirurgisk forskning ; MEDICIN ; MEDICINE ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Osseointegration ; Rabbits ; Spectrum Analysis ; strength and rate of osseointegration ; surface chemistry ; Surface Properties ; surface topography ; Surgery ; Surgical research ; Time Factors ; Titanium - chemistry ; titanium implant ; Torque ; Transplantation surgery ; Transplantationskirurgi</subject><ispartof>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 2009-06, Vol.89A (4), p.942-950</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18470920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-3867$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sul, Young-Taeg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Byung-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Um, Heung-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chan-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrektsson, Tomas</creatorcontrib><title>The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone</title><title>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine‐turned, aluminum oxide‐blasted, and processed with the micro‐arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - physiology</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Implants, Experimental</subject><subject>Kirurgi</subject><subject>Kirurgisk forskning</subject><subject>MEDICIN</subject><subject>MEDICINE</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis</subject><subject>strength and rate of osseointegration</subject><subject>surface chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>surface topography</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical research</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Titanium - chemistry</subject><subject>titanium implant</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Transplantation surgery</subject><subject>Transplantationskirurgi</subject><issn>1549-3296</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><issn>0021-9304</issn><issn>1552-4965</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtz0zAUhTUMDH3Aij2jFZuOg_V0vCylKZAWNgW608j2VaJiW0aSJ82_R27SdkcXGml0v3N0dQ9C70g-I3lOP95W3UzPGM05eYEOiRA046UUL6czLzNGS3mAjkK4TbDMBX2NDsicF3lJ80O0uV4D9q6FgJ3BYfRG14DrNXQ2RL_Fum9wdINbeT2st9j2OCZBKkG_iuv7stcRJrELAZztIyQ2WtdPd9FG3duxw7YbWt3HMDlUroc36JXRbYC3-_0Y_VycX599yS5_XHw9O73Mas44yYwpJCFMSFqQgjSU1U1hgDQVN7oxQjDNqpqXoiF0Lpnh87zkNaOyqakkWjJ2jE52vmEDw1ipwdtO-61y2qrP9tepcn6V1qjYXBaJ_rCjB-_-jhCiSmOooU2tgxuDkgUlVIjyWZBxVkhZ0qf3a5_m48E8dkByNcWnUnxKq_v4Ev1-bztWHTRP7D6vBJAdsLEtbP_npb59unowzXaalCjcPWq0_5P-wwqhfn-_UDfsarlcLm7Ugv0DK0C2Og</recordid><startdate>20090615</startdate><enddate>20090615</enddate><creator>Sul, Young-Taeg</creator><creator>Kang, Byung-Soo</creator><creator>Johansson, Carina</creator><creator>Um, Heung-Sik</creator><creator>Park, Chan-Jin</creator><creator>Albrektsson, Tomas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D91</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090615</creationdate><title>The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone</title><author>Sul, Young-Taeg ; Kang, Byung-Soo ; Johansson, Carina ; Um, Heung-Sik ; Park, Chan-Jin ; Albrektsson, Tomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - physiology</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Implants, Experimental</topic><topic>Kirurgi</topic><topic>Kirurgisk forskning</topic><topic>MEDICIN</topic><topic>MEDICINE</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis</topic><topic>strength and rate of osseointegration</topic><topic>surface chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>surface topography</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical research</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Titanium - chemistry</topic><topic>titanium implant</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Transplantation surgery</topic><topic>Transplantationskirurgi</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sul, Young-Taeg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Byung-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Um, Heung-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chan-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrektsson, Tomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet</collection><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sul, Young-Taeg</au><au>Kang, Byung-Soo</au><au>Johansson, Carina</au><au>Um, Heung-Sik</au><au>Park, Chan-Jin</au><au>Albrektsson, Tomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2009-06-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>89A</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>942</spage><epage>950</epage><pages>942-950</pages><issn>1549-3296</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><issn>0021-9304</issn><eissn>1552-4965</eissn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine‐turned, aluminum oxide‐blasted, and processed with the micro‐arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18470920</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.a.32041</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-3296 |
ispartof | Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 2009-06, Vol.89A (4), p.942-950 |
issn | 1549-3296 1097-4636 0021-9304 1552-4965 1552-4981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67212559 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animals bone Bone and Bones - physiology Chickens Implants, Experimental Kirurgi Kirurgisk forskning MEDICIN MEDICINE Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Osseointegration Rabbits Spectrum Analysis strength and rate of osseointegration surface chemistry Surface Properties surface topography Surgery Surgical research Time Factors Titanium - chemistry titanium implant Torque Transplantation surgery Transplantationskirurgi |
title | The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20roles%20of%20surface%20chemistry%20and%20topography%20in%20the%20strength%20and%20rate%20of%20osseointegration%20of%20titanium%20implants%20in%20bone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Biomedical%20Materials%20Research%20Part%20B&rft.au=Sul,%20Young-Taeg&rft.date=2009-06-15&rft.volume=89A&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=942&rft.epage=950&rft.pages=942-950&rft.issn=1549-3296&rft.eissn=1552-4965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.a.32041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E67212559%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34376692&rft_id=info:pmid/18470920&rfr_iscdi=true |