Loading…

The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone

The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (bla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B 2009-06, Vol.89A (4), p.942-950
Main Authors: Sul, Young-Taeg, Kang, Byung-Soo, Johansson, Carina, Um, Heung-Sik, Park, Chan-Jin, Albrektsson, Tomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633
container_end_page 950
container_issue 4
container_start_page 942
container_title Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B
container_volume 89A
creator Sul, Young-Taeg
Kang, Byung-Soo
Johansson, Carina
Um, Heung-Sik
Park, Chan-Jin
Albrektsson, Tomas
description The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine‐turned, aluminum oxide‐blasted, and processed with the micro‐arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm.a.32041
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67212559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67212559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtz0zAUhTUMDH3Aij2jFZuOg_V0vCylKZAWNgW608j2VaJiW0aSJ82_R27SdkcXGml0v3N0dQ9C70g-I3lOP95W3UzPGM05eYEOiRA046UUL6czLzNGS3mAjkK4TbDMBX2NDsicF3lJ80O0uV4D9q6FgJ3BYfRG14DrNXQ2RL_Fum9wdINbeT2st9j2OCZBKkG_iuv7stcRJrELAZztIyQ2WtdPd9FG3duxw7YbWt3HMDlUroc36JXRbYC3-_0Y_VycX599yS5_XHw9O73Mas44yYwpJCFMSFqQgjSU1U1hgDQVN7oxQjDNqpqXoiF0Lpnh87zkNaOyqakkWjJ2jE52vmEDw1ipwdtO-61y2qrP9tepcn6V1qjYXBaJ_rCjB-_-jhCiSmOooU2tgxuDkgUlVIjyWZBxVkhZ0qf3a5_m48E8dkByNcWnUnxKq_v4Ev1-bztWHTRP7D6vBJAdsLEtbP_npb59unowzXaalCjcPWq0_5P-wwqhfn-_UDfsarlcLm7Ugv0DK0C2Og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34376692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Sul, Young-Taeg ; Kang, Byung-Soo ; Johansson, Carina ; Um, Heung-Sik ; Park, Chan-Jin ; Albrektsson, Tomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Sul, Young-Taeg ; Kang, Byung-Soo ; Johansson, Carina ; Um, Heung-Sik ; Park, Chan-Jin ; Albrektsson, Tomas</creatorcontrib><description>The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine‐turned, aluminum oxide‐blasted, and processed with the micro‐arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-3296</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-4636</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18470920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; bone ; Bone and Bones - physiology ; Chickens ; Implants, Experimental ; Kirurgi ; Kirurgisk forskning ; MEDICIN ; MEDICINE ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Osseointegration ; Rabbits ; Spectrum Analysis ; strength and rate of osseointegration ; surface chemistry ; Surface Properties ; surface topography ; Surgery ; Surgical research ; Time Factors ; Titanium - chemistry ; titanium implant ; Torque ; Transplantation surgery ; Transplantationskirurgi</subject><ispartof>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 2009-06, Vol.89A (4), p.942-950</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18470920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-3867$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sul, Young-Taeg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Byung-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Um, Heung-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chan-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrektsson, Tomas</creatorcontrib><title>The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone</title><title>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine‐turned, aluminum oxide‐blasted, and processed with the micro‐arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - physiology</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Implants, Experimental</subject><subject>Kirurgi</subject><subject>Kirurgisk forskning</subject><subject>MEDICIN</subject><subject>MEDICINE</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis</subject><subject>strength and rate of osseointegration</subject><subject>surface chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>surface topography</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical research</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Titanium - chemistry</subject><subject>titanium implant</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Transplantation surgery</subject><subject>Transplantationskirurgi</subject><issn>1549-3296</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><issn>0021-9304</issn><issn>1552-4965</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtz0zAUhTUMDH3Aij2jFZuOg_V0vCylKZAWNgW608j2VaJiW0aSJ82_R27SdkcXGml0v3N0dQ9C70g-I3lOP95W3UzPGM05eYEOiRA046UUL6czLzNGS3mAjkK4TbDMBX2NDsicF3lJ80O0uV4D9q6FgJ3BYfRG14DrNXQ2RL_Fum9wdINbeT2st9j2OCZBKkG_iuv7stcRJrELAZztIyQ2WtdPd9FG3duxw7YbWt3HMDlUroc36JXRbYC3-_0Y_VycX599yS5_XHw9O73Mas44yYwpJCFMSFqQgjSU1U1hgDQVN7oxQjDNqpqXoiF0Lpnh87zkNaOyqakkWjJ2jE52vmEDw1ipwdtO-61y2qrP9tepcn6V1qjYXBaJ_rCjB-_-jhCiSmOooU2tgxuDkgUlVIjyWZBxVkhZ0qf3a5_m48E8dkByNcWnUnxKq_v4Ev1-bztWHTRP7D6vBJAdsLEtbP_npb59unowzXaalCjcPWq0_5P-wwqhfn-_UDfsarlcLm7Ugv0DK0C2Og</recordid><startdate>20090615</startdate><enddate>20090615</enddate><creator>Sul, Young-Taeg</creator><creator>Kang, Byung-Soo</creator><creator>Johansson, Carina</creator><creator>Um, Heung-Sik</creator><creator>Park, Chan-Jin</creator><creator>Albrektsson, Tomas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D91</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090615</creationdate><title>The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone</title><author>Sul, Young-Taeg ; Kang, Byung-Soo ; Johansson, Carina ; Um, Heung-Sik ; Park, Chan-Jin ; Albrektsson, Tomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - physiology</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Implants, Experimental</topic><topic>Kirurgi</topic><topic>Kirurgisk forskning</topic><topic>MEDICIN</topic><topic>MEDICINE</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis</topic><topic>strength and rate of osseointegration</topic><topic>surface chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>surface topography</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical research</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Titanium - chemistry</topic><topic>titanium implant</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Transplantation surgery</topic><topic>Transplantationskirurgi</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sul, Young-Taeg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Byung-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Um, Heung-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chan-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrektsson, Tomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet</collection><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sul, Young-Taeg</au><au>Kang, Byung-Soo</au><au>Johansson, Carina</au><au>Um, Heung-Sik</au><au>Park, Chan-Jin</au><au>Albrektsson, Tomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2009-06-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>89A</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>942</spage><epage>950</epage><pages>942-950</pages><issn>1549-3296</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><issn>0021-9304</issn><eissn>1552-4965</eissn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine‐turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine‐turned and aluminum oxide‐blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine‐turned, aluminum oxide‐blasted, and processed with the micro‐arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18470920</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.a.32041</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-3296
ispartof Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 2009-06, Vol.89A (4), p.942-950
issn 1549-3296
1097-4636
0021-9304
1552-4965
1552-4981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67212559
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
bone
Bone and Bones - physiology
Chickens
Implants, Experimental
Kirurgi
Kirurgisk forskning
MEDICIN
MEDICINE
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Osseointegration
Rabbits
Spectrum Analysis
strength and rate of osseointegration
surface chemistry
Surface Properties
surface topography
Surgery
Surgical research
Time Factors
Titanium - chemistry
titanium implant
Torque
Transplantation surgery
Transplantationskirurgi
title The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20roles%20of%20surface%20chemistry%20and%20topography%20in%20the%20strength%20and%20rate%20of%20osseointegration%20of%20titanium%20implants%20in%20bone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Biomedical%20Materials%20Research%20Part%20B&rft.au=Sul,%20Young-Taeg&rft.date=2009-06-15&rft.volume=89A&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=942&rft.epage=950&rft.pages=942-950&rft.issn=1549-3296&rft.eissn=1552-4965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.a.32041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E67212559%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4341-ff761135627171d23cd7fe1db4fadf553a3bc495d12863f48094c326dc261a633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34376692&rft_id=info:pmid/18470920&rfr_iscdi=true