Loading…
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice
. Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2009-05, Vol.87 (3), p.323-328 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4179-ca97068bf19cf8dcc3e846e16f6faae2882586e3144115f053d4e44e98cb7ab93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4179-ca97068bf19cf8dcc3e846e16f6faae2882586e3144115f053d4e44e98cb7ab93 |
container_end_page | 328 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Halkiadakis, Ioannis Patsea, Eleni Chatzimichali, Katerina Skouriotis, Sotiris Chalkidou, Sonia Amariotakis, Georgios Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios Theodossiadis, George Amariotakis, Apostolos Georgopoulos, Gerasimos |
description | .
Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT).
Results: Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 ± 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01239.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67218516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67218516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4179-ca97068bf19cf8dcc3e846e16f6faae2882586e3144115f053d4e44e98cb7ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLFOwzAQhi0EoqXwCsgTW4IdJ44zMFQVFKRKHQCJzTiOA67iONiJ2rw9Ca3alVvuJH__nfUBADEK8VD3mxCnSRKQlLIwQoiFCEckC3dnYHp8OD_OyccEXHm_QYhiSuNLMMGMEkxIMgWfC2sa4bS3NbQlLPpaGC2htHVrOwdbW1ujWtfDrW6_4dJWhRF1DUXTVKIWrR5iJ0bX8KsSnbRGwMYJ2WqprsFFKSqvbg59Bt6fHt8Wz8FqvXxZzFeBjHGaBVJkKaIsL3EmS1ZISRSLqcK0pKUQKmIsShhVBMcxxkmJElLEKo5VxmSeijwjM3C339s4-9Mp33KjvVTV8E1lO89pGmGWYDqAbA9KZ713quSN00a4nmPER7t8w0dxfJTIR7v8zy7fDdHbw40uN6o4BQ86B-BhD2x1pfp_L-bz9es4kV_NV4r9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67218516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Halkiadakis, Ioannis ; Patsea, Eleni ; Chatzimichali, Katerina ; Skouriotis, Sotiris ; Chalkidou, Sonia ; Amariotakis, Georgios ; Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios ; Theodossiadis, George ; Amariotakis, Apostolos ; Georgopoulos, Gerasimos</creator><creatorcontrib>Halkiadakis, Ioannis ; Patsea, Eleni ; Chatzimichali, Katerina ; Skouriotis, Sotiris ; Chalkidou, Sonia ; Amariotakis, Georgios ; Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios ; Theodossiadis, George ; Amariotakis, Apostolos ; Georgopoulos, Gerasimos</creatorcontrib><description>.
Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT).
Results: Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 ± 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than GAT IOP values (17.9 ± 4.7 mmHg). The mean difference between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.1 mmHg (range − 3.4 to 9.7 mmHg). The difference followed a normal distribution. Measurements made with DCT and GAT correlated significantly with one another (Spearman’s rho = 0.761, p < 0.001). Neither GAT nor DCT measurements showed a significant correlation with CCT (537 ± 39 μm, range 458–656 μm). Multivariate regression analysis has shown that the difference between DCT and GAT is influenced significantly by ocular pulse amplitude (r = − 0.334, p = 0.001) and it is not influenced by CCT (r = − 0.106, p = 0.292).
Conclusions: In eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, DCT facilitates suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT readings. Variation in CCT cannot by itself explain the differences in measurements taken with DCT and GAT in a number of eyes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01239.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18631335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; central corneal thickness ; dynamic contour tonometry ; Female ; glaucoma ; Glaucoma - diagnosis ; Glaucoma - physiopathology ; Goldmann applanation tonometry ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Male ; Middle Aged ; ocular hypertension ; Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis ; Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tonometry, Ocular - methods ; Tonometry, Ocular - standards</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2009-05, Vol.87 (3), p.323-328</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Acta Ophthalmol</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4179-ca97068bf19cf8dcc3e846e16f6faae2882586e3144115f053d4e44e98cb7ab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4179-ca97068bf19cf8dcc3e846e16f6faae2882586e3144115f053d4e44e98cb7ab93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18631335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halkiadakis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patsea, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzimichali, Katerina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skouriotis, Sotiris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalkidou, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amariotakis, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodossiadis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amariotakis, Apostolos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgopoulos, Gerasimos</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>.
Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT).
Results: Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 ± 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than GAT IOP values (17.9 ± 4.7 mmHg). The mean difference between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.1 mmHg (range − 3.4 to 9.7 mmHg). The difference followed a normal distribution. Measurements made with DCT and GAT correlated significantly with one another (Spearman’s rho = 0.761, p < 0.001). Neither GAT nor DCT measurements showed a significant correlation with CCT (537 ± 39 μm, range 458–656 μm). Multivariate regression analysis has shown that the difference between DCT and GAT is influenced significantly by ocular pulse amplitude (r = − 0.334, p = 0.001) and it is not influenced by CCT (r = − 0.106, p = 0.292).
Conclusions: In eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, DCT facilitates suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT readings. Variation in CCT cannot by itself explain the differences in measurements taken with DCT and GAT in a number of eyes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>central corneal thickness</subject><subject>dynamic contour tonometry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Goldmann applanation tonometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>ocular hypertension</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - methods</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - standards</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLFOwzAQhi0EoqXwCsgTW4IdJ44zMFQVFKRKHQCJzTiOA67iONiJ2rw9Ca3alVvuJH__nfUBADEK8VD3mxCnSRKQlLIwQoiFCEckC3dnYHp8OD_OyccEXHm_QYhiSuNLMMGMEkxIMgWfC2sa4bS3NbQlLPpaGC2htHVrOwdbW1ujWtfDrW6_4dJWhRF1DUXTVKIWrR5iJ0bX8KsSnbRGwMYJ2WqprsFFKSqvbg59Bt6fHt8Wz8FqvXxZzFeBjHGaBVJkKaIsL3EmS1ZISRSLqcK0pKUQKmIsShhVBMcxxkmJElLEKo5VxmSeijwjM3C339s4-9Mp33KjvVTV8E1lO89pGmGWYDqAbA9KZ713quSN00a4nmPER7t8w0dxfJTIR7v8zy7fDdHbw40uN6o4BQ86B-BhD2x1pfp_L-bz9es4kV_NV4r9</recordid><startdate>200905</startdate><enddate>200905</enddate><creator>Halkiadakis, Ioannis</creator><creator>Patsea, Eleni</creator><creator>Chatzimichali, Katerina</creator><creator>Skouriotis, Sotiris</creator><creator>Chalkidou, Sonia</creator><creator>Amariotakis, Georgios</creator><creator>Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Theodossiadis, George</creator><creator>Amariotakis, Apostolos</creator><creator>Georgopoulos, Gerasimos</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200905</creationdate><title>Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice</title><author>Halkiadakis, Ioannis ; Patsea, Eleni ; Chatzimichali, Katerina ; Skouriotis, Sotiris ; Chalkidou, Sonia ; Amariotakis, Georgios ; Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios ; Theodossiadis, George ; Amariotakis, Apostolos ; Georgopoulos, Gerasimos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4179-ca97068bf19cf8dcc3e846e16f6faae2882586e3144115f053d4e44e98cb7ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>central corneal thickness</topic><topic>dynamic contour tonometry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Goldmann applanation tonometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>ocular hypertension</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - methods</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halkiadakis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patsea, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzimichali, Katerina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skouriotis, Sotiris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalkidou, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amariotakis, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodossiadis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amariotakis, Apostolos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgopoulos, Gerasimos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halkiadakis, Ioannis</au><au>Patsea, Eleni</au><au>Chatzimichali, Katerina</au><au>Skouriotis, Sotiris</au><au>Chalkidou, Sonia</au><au>Amariotakis, Georgios</au><au>Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios</au><au>Theodossiadis, George</au><au>Amariotakis, Apostolos</au><au>Georgopoulos, Gerasimos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2009-05</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>323-328</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>.
Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT).
Results: Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 ± 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than GAT IOP values (17.9 ± 4.7 mmHg). The mean difference between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.1 mmHg (range − 3.4 to 9.7 mmHg). The difference followed a normal distribution. Measurements made with DCT and GAT correlated significantly with one another (Spearman’s rho = 0.761, p < 0.001). Neither GAT nor DCT measurements showed a significant correlation with CCT (537 ± 39 μm, range 458–656 μm). Multivariate regression analysis has shown that the difference between DCT and GAT is influenced significantly by ocular pulse amplitude (r = − 0.334, p = 0.001) and it is not influenced by CCT (r = − 0.106, p = 0.292).
Conclusions: In eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, DCT facilitates suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT readings. Variation in CCT cannot by itself explain the differences in measurements taken with DCT and GAT in a number of eyes.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18631335</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01239.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-375X |
ispartof | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2009-05, Vol.87 (3), p.323-328 |
issn | 1755-375X 1755-3768 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67218516 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over central corneal thickness dynamic contour tonometry Female glaucoma Glaucoma - diagnosis Glaucoma - physiopathology Goldmann applanation tonometry Humans Intraocular Pressure Male Middle Aged ocular hypertension Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology Reproducibility of Results Tonometry, Ocular - methods Tonometry, Ocular - standards |
title | Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A34%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20dynamic%20contour%20tonometry%20with%20Goldmann%20applanation%20tonometry%20in%20glaucoma%20practice&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Halkiadakis,%20Ioannis&rft.date=2009-05&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=323-328&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01239.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67218516%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4179-ca97068bf19cf8dcc3e846e16f6faae2882586e3144115f053d4e44e98cb7ab93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67218516&rft_id=info:pmid/18631335&rfr_iscdi=true |